Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/27/2005 Council Minutes• 1 2 APPROVED CITY OF LINO LAKES MINUTES 3 4 5 DATE : June 27, 2005 6 TIME STARTED : 6:35 P.M. 7 TIME ENDED : 9:07 P.M. 8 MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmembers Carlson, Dahl, Reinert, 9 and Mayor Bergeson 10 MEMBERS ABSENT : Councilmember Stoltz 11 12 Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; Economic Development Coordinator, 13 Mary Divine; Community Development Director, Michael Grochala; City Planner, Jeff Smyser; City 14 Planner, Paul Bengtson; Chief of Police, Dave Pecchia; City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; and City Clerk, 15 Ann Blair. 16 17 OPEN MIKE 18 19 Dennis Asche, 7117 Lakeview Drive, presented a petition containing 35 names requesting City water 20 and sewer for Lakeview, which he presented to the Council. 21 22 SETTING THE AGENDA • 23 24 Mayor Bergeson noted there are two possible resolutions for the Vadnais Lakes Area Watershed 25 Management Organization (VLAWMO) Restructuring. 26 27 Councilmember Carlson asked that the draft minutes of the Council Goal Setting Meeting be removed 28 from the consent agenda until she has had a chance to review them. City Administrator Heitke noted 29 the minutes were e-mailed to the Councilmembers last Friday; however, the City is experiencing 30 some problems with e-mail. 31 32 The agenda was accepted as amended. 33 34 CONSENT AGENDA 35 36 Councilmember Dahl asked that on the June 8, 2005 Council Work Session minutes, page 3, line 19, 37 should say `...to be in a verbatim format.' 38 39 Councilmember Reinert moved to approve the Consent Agenda with that minor amendment. 40 Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion. 41 42 Motion carried unanimously. 43 fb44 45 COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 27, 2005 APPROVED •46 ITEM ACTION 47 48 A. CONSIDERATION OF EXPENDITURES: 49 50 i) June 27, 2005 (Check No. 74028 - 51 74143, $361,272.20). Approved 52 53 ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 14768 - 54 14780, $1,738.46) Approved 55 56 B. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING 57 LICENSING FOR ST. JOSEPH'S 58 CATHOLIC CHURCH ANNUAL FALL 59 FESTIVAL Approved 60 61 C. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO THE 62 ACCLAIM BENEFITS HIPAA BUSINESS 63 ASSOCIATE ADDENDUM Approved 64 65 D. AUTHORIZATION FOR EXPENDITURE 66 OF FORFEITURE FUNDS Approved 67 68 E. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF 69 ADMINISTRATOR REVIEW Approved 70 71 F. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF 72 GOAL SETTING Removed 73 74 G. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF 75 JUNE 8, 2005 COUNCIL WORK SESSION Approved 76 77 H. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF 78 JUNE 13, 2005 CITY COUNCIL MEETING Approved 79 80 FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, AL ROLEK 81 82 There was none. 83 84 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH 85 86 A. Consideration of Annual Liquor License Renewals 87 88 City Clerk Blair presented the Staff report, indicating Staff is recommending approval of all of the • 89 mentioned licenses. 90 COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 27, 2005 APPROVED • 91 Councilmember Reinert commented he did not see Club 49 on the list. City Clerk Blair noted that 92 their license has lapsed, and it will not be renewed since they are now closed. 93 94 Councilmember Reinert moved to approve the Annual Liquor License Renewals as outlined in the 95 Staff report. Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion. 96 97 Motion carried unanimously. 98 99 B. Consideration of VLAWMO Restructuring 100 101 Mayor Bergeson noted that when this was discussed at the work session, the Council was undecided 102 on what the action would be. He stated Staff has prepared two motions; one supporting the 103 continuation of VLAWMO as it exists, and the second approving a merger with the Ramsey - 104 Washington Watershed District. 105 106 City Administrator Heitke stated Staff does not have any additional information since the work 107 session. He indicated he spoke with Jeff McGough, their VLAWMO representative, who stated there 108 was no additional information that could be provided. 109 110 Mayor Bergeson stated the other cities that are part of VLAWMO have been split in their decisions, 111 and noted their representative was recommending the merger with the Ramsey -Washington .112 Watershed District. 113 114 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution #05-88 approving the merger of the Vadnais 115 Lake Area Water Management Organization with the Ramsey -Washington Metro Watershed District 116 Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion. 117 118 Councilmember Carlson noted this was a difficult decision. She stated she did talk to several people, 119 including members of the Ramsey -Washington Watershed District board. She indicated she believes 120 the key point is what they will be able to do for the environment, and being able to get the best 121 services for their community. She stated the downside to the merger is the cost is 25% higher, and 122 she did suggest to the Watershed District representative that perhaps a neighborhood meeting should 123 be held. She indicated in spite of the increase, she believes they will receive better services, and she 124 will support the merger. 125 126 Councilmember Reinert agreed that in spite of the increase, the current organization is just not 127 efficient, and he believes the benefits and services they will receive will be worth the increased cost. 128 129 Motion carried unanimously. 130 131 Resolution No. 05-88 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 132 133 0134 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER 135 3 COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 27, 2005 APPROVED 0136 A. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-86, Approving New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC 137 Antenna Lease Agreement 138 139 City Administrator Heitke summarized the Staff report, noting that the agreement calls for a term 140 increase of 7 %2 percent, rather than an annual increase. 141 142 Councilmember Carlson moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-86, Approving New Cingular Wireless 143 PCS, LLC Antenna Lease Agreement. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 144 145 Motion carried unanimously. 146 147 Resolution No. 05-86 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 148 149 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, MICHAEL GROCHALA 150 151 A. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-85, Authorization Distribution of I -35E Corridor 152 Draft AUAR for Public Comment, Jeff Smyser 153 154 City Planner Smyser summarized the Staff report, and introduced John Shardlow and Ciara 155 Schlichting. 156 Mr. Shardlow stated one recommendation from the work session was to review what an AUAR is, .157 158 and why the City is preparing this, as well as the difference between an EAW, and EIS, and an 159 AUAR. He explained the rules that determine when each type of document is needed, and which 160 governmental agency is responsible for ordering the preparation, and reviewing the document for 161 comment. He discussed how the I -35E corridor AUAR is different than a standard AUAR. 162 163 Ms. Schlichting reviewed that traffic played a big factor in all three scenarios reviewed in the AUAR. 164 She stated all three scenarios would result in significant traffic increases, and in intersections that 165 would be rated F, which is less than ideal. She reviewed the figures shown in the AUAR, noting that 166 these depict graphically where the problem areas are located. She stated that to mitigate these traffic 167 problem areas, traffic lights and turn lanes would be needed in several locations. 168 169 Ms. Schlichting stated there are also ecologically sensitive resources that need to be preserved, and 170 there are several ways to mitigate these resources. She reviewed a graphic that depicts the 171 Conservation Design Framework, which serve three purposes; stormwater conveyance, connecting 172 wildlife, and connecting humans. She advised the Stormwater Management Plan will control how 173 much run-off there is from the property. She noted when they reviewed the AUAR with the 174 Environmental Board, they were supportive of both the Conservation Design Framework and the 175 Stormwater Management Plan. 176 177 Ms. Schlichting reviewed that the AUAR looked at the regional sanitary sewer capacity, and the 178 interceptor is already underway. She stated that unfortunately the worst case scenario requires more 0179 capacity; however there should be sufficient capacity until 2030. She reviewed the cultural resources 4 COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 27, 2005 APPROVED 0180 on the site, and stated it is important to identify these before development starts to avoid possible 181 destruction. 182 183 Mr. Shardlow stated that on June 22, they attended a Council work session and reviewed the AUAR 184 with them, and prior to that reviewed it with the Environmental Board and received their input. He 185 indicated the action tonight is to authorize the distribution for public comment. He stated that 186 subsequent to that, the final AUAR will be distributed and there will be an additional, shorter public 187 comment period. He noted that the final AUAR is this draft document and all of those comments. 188 189 Mr. Shardlow reviewed the timeframe for the review period, and the process that follows. He noted 190 copies of the document are available for review at City Hall, at the local library, and on the City's 191 website. 192 193 City Planner Smyser noted that the document can also be burned on a CD which will be available at 194 City Hall. 195 196 Councilmember Carlson expressed concerns about the number of housing units shown in scenario #3 197 in contrast to the figures mentioned in the Comprehensive Plan. She commented that the AUAR 198 mentions that the traffic focused on the p.m. peak period, and she is concerned that some peak traffic 199 periods may have been missed by taking this approach. 200 .201 Ms. Schlichting stated that the AUAR is required to look at worst case scenarios, and that they did not 202 consider seasonal peak traffic such as that for Eagle Brook Church on certain holidays, because to do 203 so would be to drastically overbuild the road system. 204 205 Councilmember Carlson stated she had concerns about the City's costs for improvements, and asked 206 when the Rush Line is proposed, as it seems like there is a reliance on that. Ms. Schlichting stated 207 she is unsure when the Rush Line will be available, but possibly 2020. She indicated that is not used 208 as a mitigation measure, just as they do not use pedestrian measures as mitigation, though people will 209 use those methods. 210 211 Councilmember Carlson questioned why some property owners are listed and others are not, and 212 stated it would be helpful if those with 50 acres or more were listed. She asked why they would not 213 change the Comprehensive Plan prior to this review, rather than study the current plan that will 214 change. She stated there are some situations where it may be better if they have plans in front of 215 them. Ms. Schlichting stated if the City did a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and then did an 216 AUAR, they may have to go back and re -do the Comprehensive Plan Amendment a second time prior 217 to the required 2008 Metropolitan Council review. She indicated that because this AUAR is being 218 done in a pro -active manner, it would be difficult to know all of the Comprehensive Plan changes that 219 could be needed. She stated this AUAR sets up a process for when plans come in. 220 221 Mr. Shardlow noted that Hardwood Creek did make application to the City for a large portion of this 222 area, and are funding a good portion of the AUAR. 023 5 COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 27, 2005 APPROVED 0224 Councilmember Carlson noted that Clearwater Creek is showing leaking underground tanks, and 225 questioned why that was, considering the station is not very old. Mayor Bergeson asked Staff to do 226 some checking and report back to the Council. 227 228 Councilmember Carlson asked for clarification on the grace period for hooking up to water and 229 sanitary sewer mentioned in the AUAR. Community Development Director Grochala explained that 230 when City sanitary sewer and water are provided by a property, the City requires that when the 231 properties current well or sewer system fails, they hook up to the City systems, but there is no time 232 limit on when that occurs. 233 234 Councilmember Carlson asked if a stadium came to Lino Lakes, if additional studies would be 235 required, which Staff confirmed it would. She also asked about the possible northerly bypass, and 236 Ms. Schlichting stated any Federal Transportation Project would require separate study. 237 238 Councilmember Reinert commented on the comparisons made between the Comprehensive Plan and 239 the AUAR scenarios, stating he wanted to dispel the belief that there should be a comparison. He 240 indicated the Comprehensive Plan is created to give the City Council control and allow them to plan 241 for the city. He stated the 8000+ homes reviewed in the AUAR was an intentional worst case 242 scenario for the purpose of seeing the upper limits of the infrastructure and development. He 243 indicated the AUAR is an 'on purpose' exaggeration for the purpose of determining impacts to the 244 area. .245 246 Ms. Schlichting agreed, stating that this allows them to review mitigation plans for different 247 scenarios. She indicated one way to mitigate areas where development chokes the system is through 248 land use decisions, which become more apparent when you have the benefit of an AUAR. She noted 249 additional mitigation strategies will be in the final AUAR. 250 251 Councilmember Carlson moved to table the authorization of distribution of I -35E Corridor Draft 252 AUAR until the next Council work session. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 253 254 Councilmember Reinert stated he would not be in favor of tabling; indicating the action tonight is 255 simply to distribute the AUAR to the public for public comment. He indicated he does not see that 256 anything would be gained by keeping this from the public for two more weeks, rather than gathering 257 their comments for the final document. 258 259 Councilmember Carlson commented that she believes it can be out to the public in the library and on 260 the City's website prior to their discussion at the work session. Mayor Bergeson disagreed, stating 261 that he does not believe it should be made public until the Council has approved it for distribution. 262 263 Councilmember Carlson stated her concerns were the lack of language about a possible Vikings 264 stadium or the Northerly bypass, and that each would require additional study. Councilmember 265 Reinert stated those concerns do not change the document and he believes it should be released to the 266 public. .67 6 COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 27, 2005 APPROVED 0268 Mr. Shardlow noted they could put information on the City's website about a stadium or Northerly 269 connection in case anyone questions why that is not specifically mentioned. 270 271 Motion failed. Vote: 3:1 Mayor Bergeson, Councilmembers Dahl and Reinert opposed. 272 273 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-85, Authorizing Distribution of I -35E 274 Corridor Draft AUAR for Public Comment. Mayor Bergeson seconded the motion. 275 276 Councilmember Carlson reiterated her concerns on the amount of housing showing in the AUAR, and 277 the breakdown of acreage for unsewered residential property. She stated she also would like to 278 propose an amendment to the motion that language concerning a possible Vikings stadium and the 279 Northerly bypass be included in the AUAR document. Councilmember Dahl seconded the 280 amendment request. 281 282 Councilmember Reinert commented he feels that would be redundant, as there is already language in 283 the document that states that type of development is not included in this study. Councilmember 284 Carlson stated there are many things in the document that are redundant, and they are important points 285 that she believes should be included. She asked how 20th Avenue was changed from a B arterial road 286 to an A arterial road. Community Development Director Grochala indicated that was based on traffic, 287 and Anoka County requested the change. He stated that is a County Road designation with regional 288 authority, so Anoka County has the jurisdiction to make that change. .89 90 On the proposed amendment, Motion failed. Vote: 2:2 Mayor Bergeson and Councilmember Reinert 291 opposed. 292 293 Councilmember Reinert reiterated that comparisons between the Comprehensive Plan and the AUAR 294 are not even comparisons, and the AUAR does not change the Comprehensive Plan. He re -stated that 295 the scenarios given in the AUAR are `on -purpose' exaggerations for the purpose of educating the City 296 to be prepared for anything, and the Comprehensive Plan is a guide for the City Council to use in 297 making planning decisions. 298 299 Mayor Bergeson thanked those involved for an outstanding piece of work, stating it is very thorough. 300 He indicated he is glad they have the benefit of having a study on a larger area, as he does not think 301 they could require this level of detail on smaller development parcels. He stated he can see the day 302 they may be doing this on other parts of the City as they develop. He commented that another point 303 he finds interesting is when you put a magnifying glass to the Comprehensive Plan, even as it is 304 currently drafted, it raises issues of traffic and infrastructure. He stated that is important information 305 for the City to have. 306 307 Motion carried. Vote: 3:1 Councilmember Carlson opposed. 308 309 Resolution No. 05-85 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 310 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCHIA •11 12 7 COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 27, 2005 APPROVED •13 A. Consideration of Youth Resources Contract 314 315 Police Chief Pecchia summarized the Staff report, stating Staff is requesting approval of the contract. 316 317 Councilmember Dahl moved to approve the renewal of the Youth Resource Officer Agreement with 318 the Centennial School District. Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion. 319 320 Motion carried unanimously. 321 322 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT (cont.) 323 324 C. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-87, Calling for a Public Hearing Regarding Tax 325 Abatement in Connection with YMCA Project, Mary Divine 326 327 Economic Development Assistant Divine reviewed the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends 328 approval. She noted Steve Bubul from Kennedy & Graven, and Ms. Mikala from Springsted, Inc. 329 were both in attendance. 330 331 Ms. Mikala advised the City committed to funding $1.5 million, with the preferred method being 332 through tax abatement. She gave a brief review of tax abatement. She reviewed the findings, noting 333 this would include a fifteen year tax abatement term, which is the longest allowed. She stated the 34 project would not maximize the City's ability to use tax abatement if another project came along. 35 336 Councilmember Carlson noted that Legacy at Wood's Edge is partially in the TIF District, and 337 partially out, and asked if the YMCA is in the TIF District. 338 339 Ms. Mikala stated the YMCA is out of the TIF District, adding that the tax abatement district is 340 outside the boundaries of the TIF District, and they cannot overlap. 341 342 Mayor Bergeson clarified this is not a motion to approve tax abatement, but is simply calling a public 343 hearing on the matter. 344 345 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-87 Calling for a Public Hearing 346 Regarding Tax Abatement in Connection with the YMCA Project. Councilmember Carlson seconded 347 the motion. 348 349 Motion carried unanimously. 350 351 Resolution No. 05-87 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 352 353 B. Consider FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 03-05, Amending Ordinance No. 16-01, 354 Market Place Planned Development Overlay District, Paul Bengtson 355 •56 City Planner Bengtson summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval. 357 COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 27, 2005 APPROVED 058 Councilmember Dahl moved to approve the FIRST READING of Ordinance 03-05, Amending 359 Ordinance No. 16-01, Market Place Planned Development Overlay District. Councilmember Reinert 360 seconded the motion. 361 362 Motion carried. Councilmember Dahl voted yea. Councilmember Reinert voted yea. 363 Councilmember Carlson voted yea. Mayor Bergeson voted yea. Councilmember Stoltz was absent. 364 365 Ordinance No. 03-05 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 366 367 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT (cont.) 368 369 C. Consideration of Communication Plan Services 370 371 City Administrator Heitke presented the Staff report, indicating this is being brought to the Council as 372 the result of direction from a Council work session. 373 374 Todd Rapp, Himle Horner reviewed the proposal, noting the cost, excluding out of pocket expenses is 375 $6,250 for a four month period from July 15, 2005 to November 15, 2005. He reviewed some of the 376 other cities Himle Horner has worked with, and who the project contacts would be. He stated they do 377 not view this as a communication plan on a one-time referendum issue, but as a longer-term 378 communication plan on the City's Pavement Management Program. W3379 80 Councilmember Carlson commented the City has had the same two sections of road on the 381 referendum before, and are again holding public meetings with the neighborhoods. She asked if there 382 was anything besides a petition against the projects that would prevent it from being on the 383 referendum. City Administrator Heitke stated only a petition would prevent it being on the 384 referendum. 385 386 Councilmember Carlson noted that there were comments at the work session that it would not be 387 possible to get a fully engaged public in four months. She stated she is concerned about the tight 388 timeline, and she would prefer to see a citizen survey done with the money budgeted for that purpose. 389 390 Mr. Rapp stated it is a tight timeframe if the goal is to get the issues on a referendum and have the 391 community have a full understanding of the Pavement Management Plan. He stated his 392 recommendation would be a longer term communication plan to provide a full understanding of the 393 Pavement Management Plan. 394 395 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-89 authorizing the Development and 396 Implementation of a Communication and Citizen Awareness Plan and Entering into a Contract with 397 Springsted, Inc., partnering with Himle Horner. Mayor Bergeson seconded the motion. 398 399 Councilmember Reinert reviewed how they came to the suggestion of having a communication plan. 400 He stated there are two areas of road reconstruction on the ballot this fall, and both have been on a •t01 ballot previously. He indicated he believes they failed because of lack of information on the projects 402 and how road reconstruction works in this city. He stated most cities do not repair roads in the way 9 COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 27, 2005 APPROVED *03 Lino Lake's Charter provides for by putting the decision in the hands of the citizens. He indicated 404 most cities have put that decision in the hands of the City Council. He stated the Council did approve 405 the feasibility studies for these areas to determine costs so the public could know and make a 406 knowledgeable decision. He indicated from there they decided to consider this communication plan 407 so the citizens would be fully informed on the City's process for reconstructing roads, and that 408 proposal is before the Council now. He stated he is 100 percent behind this communication plan, and 409 while it is a tight timeframe, it will provide the two issues on the ballot a better chance for approval, 410 and educate the citizens going for projects going forward. He commented the City has used this 411 method for road reconstruction since the mid 1980's, and only one project has been done. He stated 412 the City is way behind, and if they are going to keep their roads in good repair they need to find a way 413 to educate the citizens on how this process works. 414 415 Mayor Bergeson noted that one of the streets on the referendum is the street on which he lives, and he 416 has received advice from the attorney not to vote on those plans, however he has been told he can 417 vote on this action for a communication plan. City Attorney Hawkins verified that is correct. 418 419 Councilmember Carlson noted that a referendum in 1996 or 1997 did pass, and since then there have 420 been two referendums that failed. She stated the Athletic Complex failed 4:1, and the last road 421 reconstruction project failed 65:35. She indicated at the time of the Athletic Complex referendum she 422 and other Council members asked for a citizen survey that would have told the Council what the 423 citizens were willing to pay for and what they were not. She stated the cost of this communication 24 plan is almost as much as a survey, and if the only way she can say that the Council needs to hear 425 from the citizens is to vote no, she will do that. 426 427 Councilmember Carlson stated there is a conflict with the Charter Commission, and the Council 428 needs to meet with the Commission and resolve that conflict so they are all in agreement. She added 429 she also has concern on the effectiveness of this communication plan at this late date. 430 431 Councilmember Dahl agreed on the need for a citizen survey. She stated since the money is in the 432 budget she believes they should do that and get back in touch with the citizens that they represent. 433 She indicated it has been almost ten years since the last citizen survey, and she would prefer to see 434 that done before they approve $25,000 plus expenses for a communication plan. 435 436 Councilmember Reinert stated he is in support of a citizen survey, but a communication plan is on the 437 agenda. He indicated they are two different items, and the survey is not on the agenda. He stated the 438 survey would encompass everything going on in Lino Lakes, but they need to address a 439 communication plan for the Pavement Management Plan immediately to provide the citizens with as 440 much information as they can to make a good decision this fall. He stated a citizen survey is a great 441 idea, but that and the communication plan are two different things. 442 443 Councilmember Carlson stated she will clarify that what she said earlier is the Council needs to listen 444 to the citizens and do a survey, but they have chosen for six months not to do that even though the 445 Council knew a referendum was coming up. She believes it would be beneficial to have it done .46 before the road referendum. 447 10 COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 27, 2005 APPROVED •448 Mayor Bergeson stated a survey should cover broad topics, and he thinks it is a waste of survey 449 money to do a quick study of what people want for road improvements. He indicated a broad survey 450 is not feasible in a short period of time, and is not the issue on the agenda tonight. 451 452 Motion failed. Vote: 2:2 Councilmembers Carlson and Dahl opposed. 453 454 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT (cont.) 455 456 D. Consider FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 04-05, Amending Section 7 of the Lino 457 Lakes Zoning Ordinance related to the SC, Shopping Center District, Michael Grochala 458 459 Community Development Director Grochala summarized the Staff report, stating Staff recommends 460 approval. 461 462 Councilmember Dahl moved to approve the FIRST READING of Ordinance 04-05, Amending the 463 Zoning Ordinance of the City of Lino Lakes to designate former SC, Shopping Center Districts as 464 GB, General Business Districts and adding Subdivision 5 addressing Planned Development Overlays. 465 Councilmember Reinert seconded the motion. 466 467 Motion carried. Councilmember Dahl voted yea. Councilmember Reinert voted yea. 468 Councilmember Carlson voted yea. Mayor Bergeson voted yea. Councilmember Stoltz absent. •469 470 E. Federal Transportation Funding Letters of Support, Michael Grochala 471 472 i. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-81, Supporting Anoka County Application 473 for CSAH 14 Pedestrian Trail Underpass Improvements 474 475 Community Development Director Grochala reviewed the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends 476 approval. 477 478 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-81, Supporting Anoka County 479 Application for CSAH 14 Pedestrian Trail Underpass Improvements. Councilmember Dahl seconded 480 the motion. 481 482 Motion carried unanimously. 483 484 Resolution No. 05-81 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 485 486 ii. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-82, Supporting Anoka County Application 487 for Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Trail Improvements 488 489 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-82 Supporting Anoka County Application 490 for Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Regional Trail Improvements. Councilmember Dahl seconded the 091 motion. 492 11 COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 27, 2005 APPROVED 0193 Motion carried unanimously. 494 495 Resolution No. 05-82 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 496 497 iii. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-83, Supporting Anoka County Application 498 for CSAH 14/I35E Interchange Improvements 499 500 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-83 Supporting Anoka County Application 501 for CSAH 14/135E Interchange Improvements. Councilmember seconded the motion. 502 503 Motion carried unanimously. 504 505 Resolution No. 05-83 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 506 507 iv. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-84, Supporting City of Centerville 508 Application for CSAH 14 Enhancements 509 510 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-84 Supporting City of Centerville 511 Application for CSAH 14 Enhancements. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 512 513 Motion carried unanimously. .14 15 Resolution No. 05-84 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 516 517 Councilmember Carlson asked for copies of the letters of support to be distributed to the Council 518 when prepared. 519 520 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 521 522 There was none. 523 524 NEW BUSINESS 525 526 There was none. 527 528 COMMUNITY CALENDAR JUNE 28, 2005 THROUGH JULY 11, 2005: 529 530 A) Wednesday, June 29, 2005, 6:30 p.m., Environmental Board Meeting 531 B) Monday, July 4, 2005, City Hall Closed • 12 COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 27, 2005 APPROVED 532 C) Tuesday, July 5, 2005, 6:30 p.m., Park Board Meeting 533 D) Wednesday, July 6, 2005, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session 534 E) Thursday, July 7, 2005, 7:00 a.m., EDAC Meeting 535 F) Monday, July 11, 2005, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting 536 537 ADJOURN 538 539 City Administrator Heitke noted that Staff learned recently that some City Councilmembers did not 540 receive information and Friday communications that were sent via e-mail. He stated the City Clerk 541 will have that information in hard copy form after the meeting. 542 543 Community Development Director Grochala noted that the City will be hosting an Open House from 544 4:30 to 7:30 p.m. on the Lake Drive/I-35W Interchange Project. He stated while they have not 545 received 100% funding, they would like to make all interested citizens aware of the status. 546 547 There being no further business, Councilmember Reinert moved to adjourn at 9:07 p.m. 548 Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion. 549 550 Motion carried unanimously. • 551 552 These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, July 25, 2005. 553 554 555 t Q� ?flip avow", 556 ( 557 Ann Blair, City Clerk John Bergeson, Mayor 558 559 Transcribed by: 560 Karen Bucklen 561 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 562 1 13