Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/11/2005 Council Minutes• • APPROVED 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES 2 MINUTES 3 4 5 DATE : July 11, 2005 6 TIME STARTED : 6:31 P.M. 7 TIME ENDED : 10:34 P.M. 8 MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmembers Carlson, Dahl, Reinert, Stoltz 9 and Mayor Bergeson 10 MEMBERS ABSENT : None 11 12 Staff members present: City Administrator, Gordon Heitke; Director of Administration, Dan Tesch; 13 Community Development Director, Michael Grochala; City Engineer, Jim Studenski; City Planner, 14 Paul Bengston (part); Police Chief, Dave Pecchia (part); City Attorney, Bill Hawkins; and City Clerk, 15 Ann Blair. 16 17 OPEN MIKE 18 19 There was none. 20 21 SETTING THE AGENDA 22 23 Mayor Bergeson stated Items 6A and 6B have been moved to immediately after the Consent Agenda. 24 25 Councilmember Carlson expressed concern that the public hearing times have been changed, which 26 may be confusing to those residents watching from home. She asked if the televised agenda could be 27 changed prior to the meeting to reflect the agenda changes. 28 29 Mayor Bergeson stated the issue had been discussed and agreed upon at the work session. He 30 concurred the televised agenda could be changed prior to the meetings to reflect agenda changes in 31 the future. 32 33 Councilmember Stoltz favored moving the public hearings forward as agreed. He felt this was 34 citizen -friendly and within the Council's latitude. 35 36 The agenda was accepted as amended. 37 38 CONSENT AGENDA 39 40 Mayor Bergeson stated Item C has been moved to the Administration Department Report, Item C. 41 42 Councilmember Stoltz moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Reinert seconded the 43 motion. 44 45 Motion carried unanimously. 46 47 ITEM ACTION 48 • 1 COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 11, 2005 APPROVED 49 A. CONSIDERATION OF EXPENDITURES: 50 51 i) June 11, 2005 (Check No. 74144 - 52 74259, $199,061.00). Approved 53 54 ii) Centennial Fire District (Check No. 14781 - 55 14796, $14,346.27) Approved 56 57 B. CONSIDERATION OF NOT WAIVING 58 MONETARY LIMITS ON TORT LIABILITY 59 PER MINN. STATUTE 466.04 Approved 60 61 C. AUTHORIZATION OF SOLICITATION OF 62 QUOTES FOR CIVIC COMPLEX ENERGY 63 CONSERVATION IMPROVEMENTS Removed 64 65 D. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF 66 BLOCK PARTY APPLICATION FOR 67 PALOMINO LANE Approved 68 69 E. AUTHORIZATION FOR EXPENDITURE OF 70 FORFEITURE FUNDS Approved 71 72 F. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF 73 GOAL SETTING, MAY 26, 2005 Approved 74 75 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, MICHAEL GROCHALA 76 77 A. Public Hearing, Shenandoah Area Street Improvement Project, Jim Studenski 78 79 Mayor Bergeson has requested Councilmember Stoltz be Acting Mayor for this hearing. Mayor 80 Bergeson stated he would not participate in items 6A or 6B, because he owns property along West 81 Shadow Lake Drive. 82 83 Acting Mayor Stoltz opened the public hearing at 6:38 p.m. 84 85 City Engineer Studenski summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval. 86 87 Councilmember Carlson asked if there were any comments on the assessment per lot regarding size. 88 City Engineer Studenski stated there were three; two were requesting clarification and one resides on 89 a cul-de-sac and felt charges should be per frontage. He noted City policy dictates charges are 90 allocated by the whole project and everyone benefiting. 91 92 Acting Mayor Stoltz asked for an explanation of the 60 -day inaction process. City Engineer 93 Studenski stated this period allows anyone to send information to City Hall and once the 60 days 94 lapses, the tally of information is brought to Council. If there was a petition of more than 50 percent 95 within an assessed area, the City would not be able to assess those residents and Council would need 96 to decide if they wanted to move forward with the project. 2 COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 11, 2005 APPROVED 97 •98 Councilmember Reinert moved to close the Public Hearing at 6:56 p.m. Councilmember Dahl 99 seconded the motion. 100 101 Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Bergeson abstained. 102 103 B. Public Hearing, West Shadow Lake Drive Street Improvement Project, Jim Studenski 104 105 Mayor Bergeson requested that Councilmember Stoltz be Acting Mayor for this hearing also. 106 107 City Engineer Studenski summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval. 108 109 Councilmember Reinert asked for an explanation of the concept of multiple assessments and increase 110 in property value with the ability to subdivide. City Engineer Studenski stated street policies are set 111 at $77 per foot on an individual lot basis so if the property can subdivide there would be multiple 112 assessments. He noted water and sewer costs are in alignment with other previous projects. 113 Assessments total $20,000 to $23,000 and are within the realm of other areas. Values increase when 114 the property can be subdivided and this increase would be significantly more than the assessments. 115 116 Councilmember Carlson noted the lot owned by the independent school district is assessed for 11 117 units and asked if the school plans to build, and, if not, would they be assessed for one property. City 118 Engineer Studenski stated the school has contacted the City and they do not plan to build because 119 they are turning the lot into a soccer field and other play areas. 120 �21 Community Development Director Grochala stated the lot question is further down the plan process. 122 He noted for purposes of the south side of West Shadow Lake Drive, elimination of sanitary sewer 123 would not reduce their amount and it provides value and the ability to subdivide. He noted at the 124 public hearing, numbers can go lower but not higher. 125 126 Councilmember Carlson asked where additional funds would be taken from. Community 127 Development Director Grochala stated the property tax levy would offset the amount. He noted if the 128 number of units were reduced the City would have to pick up a greater share of the street construction 129 costs, but pulling out water and sewer is a shared cost. 130 131 City Engineer Studenski stated there are two separate sanitary/sewer systems and because the school 132 may not subdivide on the south side this may not happen. 133 134 Councilmember Carlson asked if the sewer on the south side is eliminated what would happen to the 135 seven lots in the development north of the school; would the streets still be put in. She also asked if 136 the parcel could only hold seven lots in the development due to the wetlands, and if this number were 137 exceeded but seven lots were assessed, would it be possible to collect for more lots in the future. City 138 Engineer Studenski stated the number of lots would be a decision for the City. He noted the sewer 139 would not go down the street and property assessments would change from seven to one. He noted 140 the property is a long and narrow 10 -acre parcel and in the absence of several variances for lot width 141 requirements there is not enough land to get more full residential lots. 142 143 Community Development Director Grochala stated the City could only collect for the number of lots .44 that is on the plan tonight. He noted if they were able to get more lots in they would have to extend 3 COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 11, 2005 APPROVED 145 the street and add water and sewer hookups which the developer would pay 100 percent of the 146 improvements. .147 148 Councilmember Reinert asked when there would be a conclusion on the topic, noting the City's 149 perspective is that it washes financially and would be a benefit if it happened. He noted citizens 150 involved with the project are not assessed any greater or lesser amount. He stated he is concerned 151 because if the school district sells land in the future and water and sewer are installed, this would be a 152 benefit not taken into account with the rest of the citizens. Community Development Director 153 Grochala stated the conclusion would come in the second week of November. He noted if the project 154 is not petitioned against and the referendum is approved, the City knows they have a project. Then 155 the design, neighborhood meetings, attorney talks, etc. can be started. 156 157 Councilmember Carlson asked if it is not necessary to know prior what percentage will be assessed, 158 levied, and the total number of properties. Community Development Director Grochala stated the 159 charter requires the method of assessment be included on the ballot with the total proposed 160 assessment and levy costs. Under the law, residents may appeal assessments after a project hearing; if 161 the court awards some appeals it could alter some amounts or percentages assessed. He noted pulling 162 water and sewer and eliminating units is about equal to the number the City would be paying. 163 164 City Attorney Hawkins stated the portion the City would fund depends on the number of units. He 165 stated this is an unknown factor and the City may need to put a contingency number on the ballot. 166 167 Councilmember Carlson stated she is concerned the City gave the school a well two years ago and, 168 therefore, they would not be interested in sewer and water. Community Development Director 169 Grochala stated if the school puts in parking or a concession area for the soccer field, they might need 170 these improvements. 171 172 City Engineer Studenski explained where the trail would be and its impact. He also explained the 173 process to put in utilities and the lot split issue. 174 175 Community Development Director Grochala stated to go forward with the sewer extension there 176 needs to be a comprehensive plan amendment and a designation use. 177 178 Acting Mayor Stoltz stated this project is unique and the feasibility study came through a petition. 179 180 Acting Mayor Stoltz opened the public hearing at 7:37 p.m. 181 182 Charles Puskas, 6994 Shadow Lake Drive, noted he feels the cost is equitable and would like to see 183 the project move forward. He stated he did have questions about the referendum wording. 184 185 Chris Bretoi, 6779 Shadow Lake Drive, stated he is not in support of the project. He questioned the 186 assessment amount in relation to the increase in property value, and asked about the appeal process. 187 City Attorney Hawkins explained how benefit to the property is calculated, and noted residents could 188 appeal per Minn. Statute 429. He added he cannot give legal advice to the residents but recommends 189 residents contact their own attorney and protect their right to appeal. 190 191 Mr. Bretoi asked regarding the road route, are they trying to stay equitable to the centerline. He also 1192 asked if there would be further studies and would homeowners receive a letter detailing the appeal 4 COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 11, 2005 APPROVED 193 process, etc. because he would like to request a letter. City Engineer Studenski stated it was the .194 City's intention to equalize the impact of everyone, although there would be different perceptions of 195 what is currently out there. He noted the roadway does meander from one right-of-way to the other 196 but they used the full right-of-way with the standard equations. He noted there are no street 197 improvements closer to the property line due to what side a resident resides in. 198 199 Community Development Director Grochala stated this is not typically done but if Council wishes the 200 City Attorney could draft a cover letter. 201 202 Acting Mayor Stoltz stated Council can send the letter and it should go to the Shenandoah Area, too. 203 City Attorney Hawkins stated he could recite parts of the charter and what the resident's rights are. 204 205 Jeff Mackie, 6829 West Shadow Lake Drive, stated the neighborhood does not need the bike path and 206 asked if it would alter the nature of the street if it is installed. He expressed concerns about 207 discrepancies on the plans, and noted it is hard to contain water with such a small curb. He 208 referenced Black Duck Road, stating the street is 32 feet wide with a 1 -foot surmountable curb. He 209 also noted the City's method of assessment is troubling, stating the assessment should be per foot of 210 frontage, and he is against the plan if assessed the way proposed. 211 212 Joe Meyer, 6988 West Shadow Lake Drive, stated although there are a few naysayers it is a unique 213 neighborhood with small and large lots, and 80 to 90 percent of lake residents want the road and 214 water and sewer. Non -lake residents also want the road and do not really need the water and sewer, 215 but will take it. He noted he has concerns about how it would be placed on the ballot, if it would be 216 the Shenandoah Area and West Shadow Lake Drive separately or, as he would like to see it - 17 bundled. He concluded the City needs to figure out the best way for all residents to be served. 218 219 Mike Trehus, 675 Shadow Court, stated there is a defect in the notification process because he did not 220 receive notice of the neighborhood meeting this weekend nor did three out of four residents on 221 Shadow Court. He stated 20-25 residents attending the meeting is not a good turnout considering the 222 potential change. He commented the project is tied together and asked if it is possible to petition 223 against a portion of the project, like the bike trail and, if so, would the City be required to honor the 224 charter. City Attorney Hawkins stated a portion of the project could be petitioned against and noted 225 per the charter the petition percentage is 50 percent or more. 226 227 Mr. Trehus questioned charging for grinder pumps stating those who have good wells may want 228 sewer, but not water. He expressed concern about the longevity of the pump being proposed versus a 229 gravity sewer. He stated the trail is a dangerous design because when the road curves people have to 230 ride on the street. He asked where the ponds would be located, and if someone receives two lot 231 charges could they subdivide immediately or would they have to wait. Community Development 232 Director Grochala stated there needs to be a comprehensive plan amendment, and those provisions 233 need to be made before the project is adopted. He stated they are not adopting assessments today, 234 only holding a public hearing which proposes a maximum assessment amount. He noted actual 235 adoption would not happen until 2007 assuming the project is not petitioned against. 236 237 Nick Aloff, Planner, Anoka County Parks, stated the section of proposed street improvements impact 238 the regional trail and he would like to see this move forward. 239 • 5 COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 11, 2005 APPROVED 240 Joe Meyer, 6988 West Shadow Lake Drive, stated his view is that the citizens want a bike trail. He 2241 noted it is not going to impact the neighborhood very much and he considers it an enhancement. 42 243 Jeff Mackie, 6829 West Shadow Lake Drive, stated this project does not impact Mr. Meyer because 244 he lives on the lake. He noted where he lives the street is the most narrow. He stated this project 245 creates animosity between lake owners and non -lake owners and it comes back to how the areas are 246 assessed although everyone's property would increase in value. 247 248 Mike Trehus, 675 Shadow Court, again asked if all residents were aware of the grinder pump 249 situation noting they are different then a standard sewer. City Engineer Studenski stated there has 250 been a great deal of time spent on this issue. 251 252 Charles Puskas, 6994 West Shadow Lake Drive, asked if the cost would be assessed over 15 years. 253 City Engineer Studenski stated that is correct. 254 255 Councilmember Carlson stated there are a number of unanswered questions but some could be 256 answered by postponing closing the public hearing for two weeks. She noted the road was not 257 standard and asked why the road needs to be 32 feet wide. She suggested a motion be made to 258 include providing information to residents rather than adding this issue to New Business. Community 259 Development Director Grochala stated they are proposing the road be a standard minimum of 28 feet. 260 261 Councilmember Reinert stated when roads are reconstructed, home rule City charter dictates it be 262 taken out of the City Council's hands and put in the citizen's hands. He noted there is confusion 263 regarding wording of the referendum, lot splitting and how it benefits property owners, and there are many unanswered questions. He stated the City needs to communicate and educate affected property •64 65 owners so they can get involved with the process. 266 267 Councilmember Dahl stated there are questions about a petition against the trail and asked when 268 residents would need to submit this. Community Development Director Grochala stated the petition 269 would need to be submitted before the trail is built. Or, the petition could be submitted prior to the 270 referendum so it is not placed on the referendum. He noted it is not being assessed so the petitioning 271 process would not dictate the trail. 272 273 Councilmember Dahl stated she is concerned about closing the hearing because some residents stated 274 they were not notified and did not participate in neighborhood meetings. Community Development 275 Director Grochala stated they would review the mailing list, but failure to receive notice does not alter 276 the project. 277 278 Councilmember Dahl stated she is concerned because a grinder pump is needed which is different 279 than other road projects. She stated they do have a home rule charter and residents vote on road 280 issues; the power is with the people. 281 282 Acting Mayor Stoltz stated the home rule charter is a double-edged sword; it wants to give 283 responsibility to the citizens yet wants to make them engineers. 284 285 Councilmember Dahl moved to extend the public hearing until the next Council meeting. 286 Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion. 087 6 COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 11, 2005 APPROVED 288 Acting Mayor Stoltz asked if anything would be put in jeopardy if the hearing was extended for two 1.289 weeks. Community Development Director Grochala stated the election is within 120 days of the 290 public hearing and in order to put the question on the ballot, it must be submitted by a certain date. If 291 the public hearing is extended, Council would have to put the question on the ballot before the end of 292 the 60 -day waiting period or do a separate election after the general election. 293 294 Councilmember Carlson requested the motion be withdrawn and stated she withdraws her second. 295 296 Councilmember Dahl withdrew her motion. 297 298 Councilmember Carlson moved to close the public hearing at 8:54 p.m. and provide all citizens on 299 affected streets the information requested. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 300 301 Community Development Director Grochala asked if the information requested meant the 60 -day 302 period process and the petition process. 303 304 Councilmember Carlson stated this would be sufficient with contact information for those individuals 305 who wanted further information. 306 307 City Administrator Heitke stated there are some questions that have no answers, i.e. when can they 308 subdivide. He stated Staff will make a good faith effort to answer the questions but not all of them 309 will be able to be answered. 310 311 Motion carried unanimously. Mayor Bergeson abstained. 1312 313 Mayor Bergeson resumed the chair and called a recess at 8:54 p.m. 314 315 Mayor Bergeson reconvened the meeting at 9:01 p.m. 316 317 C. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-93, Approving Plans and Specifications and 318 Authorizing Advertisement for Bids, Legacy at Woods Edge Street and Utility Project, 319 Mike Grochala 320 321 Community Development Director Grochala summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff 322 recommends approval. 323 324 Bob Moberg, SEH, Inc., stated if approved tonight the bid opening date would be August 11, 2005 325 with a contract award date of August 25, 2005. 326 327 Councilmember Stoltz asked if construction has become highly competitive or high priced. Mr. 328 Moberg stated he believes contracts are competitive and that there is a significant amount of 329 construction activity but contractors are still very hungry for more projects. 330 331 Councilmember Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-93, Approving Plans and Specifications and 332 Authorizing Advertisement for Bids, Legacy at Woods Edge Street and Utility Project. 333 Councilmember Reinert seconded the motion. 334 .335 Motion carried unanimously. COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 11, 2005 APPROVED 336 . 337 Resolution No. 05-93 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 338 339 FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT, AL ROLEK 340 341 There was none. 342 343 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAN TESCH 344 345 A. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-94, Adopting 2005-2006 Proposed Council High - 346 Priority Goals, Objectives, and Actions, Gordon Heitke 347 348 City Administrator Heitke presented the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval. 349 350 Councilmember Carlson asked on page 9, objective 2, if the 35W City contribution is through Tax 351 Increment Financing (TIF). She also asked how the improvements would be funded once the project 352 is done. Community Development Director Grochala stated that objective refers to the I35E 353 interchange design work on the bridge. He explained that dollars were received from Congressman 354 Kennedy to pay for 80 percent of the project and the County would pay 50/50 on the remaining 20 355 percent. He noted improvements would be funded by possible assessments on developments in the 356 area. 357 358 Councilmember Carlson suggested on page 5, best practices, it should read "Council retreat" rather 359 than "Council and Staff retreat," for the first one. City Administrator Heitke asked if she was •360 suggesting a change in the objective to eliminate Staff. 361 362 Mayor Bergeson stated he does not think the goal precludes any arrangement. He noted there could 363 be numerous configurations and the objective would cover all of these. 364 365 Councilmember Dahl stated she would like a retreat for Council only and requested the wording be 366 changed. City Administrator Heitke stated some language relates to the budget setting process and a 367 retreat should occur prior to this process. 368 369 Councilmember Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-94, Adopting 2005-2006 Proposed Council 370 High -Priority Goals, Objectives, and Actions with the exception of changing the wording to "Council 371 will establish a date for a retreat before the budget financing process." 372 373 Motion failed for lack of a second. 374 375 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-94, Adopting 2005-2006 Proposed 376 Council High -Priority Goals, Objectives, and Actions. Councilmember Stoltz seconded the motion. 377 378 Mayor Bergeson stated this is an ambitious set of goals and the City would make a good faith effort. 379 He noted that at the work session, a disclaimer had been given stating they would try to follow the 380 goals where feasible. However, some may be unfeasible due to a conflict with another ordinance, etc. 381 or if they are not able to provide resources through the budget process. 382 • 8 COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 11, 2005 APPROVED 383Councilmember Carlson stated she does not believe there are too many goals, but agreed that .84 sometimes a goal may run into conflict with another goal or plan in existence. 85 386 Councilmember Stoltz stated this is a very aggressive set of goals. They are not perfect, but bring 387 accountability to the Staff. 388 389 Motion carried unanimously. 390 391 Resolution No. 05-94 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 392 393 B. Consideration of Non -Union and Management Team Salaries 394 395 Director of Administration Tesch presented the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval. 396 397 Councilmember Carlson asked if Council could receive salaries in dollars in the future. Director of 398 Administration Tesch stated yes. 399 400 Councilmember Stoltz moved to approve non-union and management team salaries. Councilmember 401 Reinert seconded the motion. 402 403 Councilmember Carlson expressed concern regarding a possible 9.5 percent increase. She asked if 404 the City would be paying overtime or additional benefits not provided in the past. She added low and 405 middle -incomes pay for this salary increase and she cannot justify it. Director of Administration 406 Tesch stated they are not eligible for overtime and will not be receiving additional benefits but they 0 407 are in the process of implementing post retirement health insurance for everyone. 408 409 Councilmember Carlson asked if each individual contributes to the post retirement health insurance 410 plan and if the City matches. Director of Administration Tesch stated the plan is like a savings plan 411 for health care and the City does not match. 412 413 Mayor Bergeson stated there is a range and 9.5 percent is the highest. He noted the City needs to 414 move along with inflation and be comparable with wages in similar cities. 415 416 Councilmember Dahl stated 9.5 percent is too open-ended. Director of Administration Tesch stated 417 there are a couple of past salary situations and now the City has an opportunity to make adjustments. 418 He noted the management group has received 1-2 percent and other groups have received 3 percent. 419 He concluded the City is developing and some salaries have accelerated. 420 421 Councilmember Reinert stated although these are larger increases, the City needs to keep up with the 422 market or staff members will go elsewhere and it would cost the City more to replace these positions. 423 424 Councilmember Stoltz stated the numbers are from a regional organization and are an independent 425 collaboration. He noted Staff is managing the City 24/7 and the City is paying at market. He 426 suggested Council take into account benefits because they do not receive an elaborate package. 427 428 Mayor Bergeson stated information is from survey group 6 and Lino Lakes is towards the higher end 429 in population and workload. He stated the proposal is a target 65th percentile and he thinks this is an 1 9 COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 11, 2005 APPROVED 430 appropriate place to be. Mayor Bergeson concluded if a salary is at or above benchmark, that 431 member will receive a 2 percent increase. +432 433 Motion carried. Vote 3:2 Councilmembers Carlson and Dahl opposed. 434 435 C. Authorize Solicitation of Quotes for Civic Complex Energy Conservation Improvements 436 437 City Administrator Heitke presented the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval. 438 439 Mayor Bergeson asked if there was a printed motion. City Administrator Heitke stated this item had 440 been added to the agenda on Friday per Councilmember request. 441 442 Councilmember Dahl asked if this is the last item needed to fix the building or would there be more 443 repairs. City Administrator Heitke stated this repair should eliminate the problem. 444 445 Councilmember Carlson asked about the roof leak. City Administrator Heitke stated he informed 446 Public Services Director DeGardner and he is looking into it. 447 448 Mayor Bergeson stated the roof should be inspected every few years. 449 450 Councilmember Carlson stated she would vote for this because the building needs to be repaired; 451 however, she previously voted for $150,000 of citizen's money to be spent but the City is not able to 452 recoup any money due to a lack of record. She added it is important the City document what is done 453 to the building. .454 455 Councilmember Reinert stated Council needs to find out how much it is going to cost. He added once 456 action is taken there would be a record. 457 458 Councilmember Stoltz stated he is in support of obtaining bids. 459 460 Councilmember Dahl moved to approve the authorization for solicitation of quotes for Civic 461 Complex energy conservation improvements. Councilmember Reinert seconded the motion. 462 463 Mayor Bergeson noted in previous discussions regarding recouping money on the building problems, 464 the result was that it was not practical or feasible and beyond legal limits. He stated he does not think 465 then or now there is any recourse. 466 467 City Administrator Heitke stated they are not authorizing to get bids, just to solicit quotes. They 468 differ in terms of legal and accounting requirements. 469 470 Motion carried unanimously. 471 472 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCHIA 473 474 There was none. 475 476 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER .477 10 COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 11, 2005 APPROVED 478 There was none. 479 480 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, MICHAEL GROCHALA 481 tContinued) 482 483 A. Public Hearing, Shenandoah Area Street Improvement Project, Jim Studenski 484 485 This item was considered directly after the Consent Agenda. 486 487 B. Public Hearing, West Shadow Lake Drive Street Improvement Project, Jim Studenski 488 489 This item was moved to earlier in the agenda. 490 491 C. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-93, Approving Plans and Specifications and 492 Authorizing Advertisement for Bids, Legacy at Woods Edge Street and Utility Project, 493 Mike Grochala 494 495 This item was moved to earlier in the agenda. 496 497 D. Consider SECOND READING of Ordinance No. 03-05, Amending Ordinance No. 16-01, 498 Market Place Planned Development Overlay District, Paul Bengston 499 500 City Planner Bengston summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval. 501 .502 Councilmember Stoltz moved to approve the SECOND READING of Ordinance No. 03-05, 503 Amending Ordinance No. 16-01, Market Place Planned Development Overlay District. 504 Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion. 505 506 Motion carried. Councilmember Carlson voted yea. Councilmember Dahl voted yea. 507 Councilmember Reinert voted yea. Councilmember Stoltz voted yea. Mayor Bergeson voted yea. 508 509 Ordinance No. 03-05 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 510 511 E. Russian Baptist Church, Paul Bengston 512 513 i. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-90, Extension of Project Initiation Time 514 515 City Planner Bengston summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval. He stated 516 the extension would be to December 2005. 517 518 Mayor Bergeson asked if the church would need to meet new regulations should they change within 519 the extension period. City Planner Bengston stated that is correct. 520 521 Councilmember Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-90, Extension of Project Initiation Time. 522 Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion. 523 524 Motion carried unanimously. 0525 11 • COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 11, 2005 APPROVED 526 Resolution No. 05-90 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 527 1.528 ii. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-91, Approving Site Improvement 529 Performance Agreement 530 531 City Planner Bengston summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval. 532 533 Councilmember Stoltz moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-91, Approving Site Improvement 534 Performance Agreement. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 535 536 Motion carried unanimously. 537 538 Resolution No. 05-91 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 539 540 F. Consider SECOND READING of Ordinance No. 04-05, Amending Section 7 of the Lino 541 Lakes Zoning Ordinance related to the SC, Shopping Center District, Michael Grochala 542 543 Community Development Director Grochala summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff 544 recommends approval. 545 546 Councilmember Reinert moved to approve the SECOND READING of Ordinance 04-05, Amending 547 Section 7 of the Lino Lakes Zoning Ordinance related to the SC, Shopping Center District. 548 Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 549 .550 Motion carried. Councilmember Carlson voted yea. Councilmember Dahl voted yea. 551 Councilmember Reinert voted yea. Councilmember Stoltz voted yea. Mayor Bergeson voted yea. 552 553 Ordinance No. 04-05 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 554 555 G. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-92, Designating No Parking, Main Street (CSAH14), 556 Jim Studenski 557 558 City Engineer Studenski summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval. 559 560 Mayor Bergeson asked if no parking on Main Street would be permanent. City Engineer Studenski 561 stated that is correct. 562 563 Councilmember Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-92, Designating No Parking, Main Street 564 (CSAH14). Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion. 565 566 Motion carried unanimously. 567 568 Resolution No. 05-92 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 569 570 H. Consideration of Resolution No. 05-95, Approving Joint Powers Agreement between 571 City of Circle Pines and City of Lino Lakes, Pine Hollow Development 572 .573 City Engineer Studenski summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval. 12 COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 11, 2005 APPROVED 574 •575 Mayor Bergeson asked if the agreement would be permanent. City Engineer Studenski stated that is 576 correct. 577 578 Councilmember Carlson moved to adopt Resolution No. 05-95, Approving Joint Powers Agreement 579 between City of Circle Pines and City of Lino Lakes, Pine Hollow Development. Councilmember 580 Stoltz seconded the motion. 581 582 Motion carried unanimously. 583 584 Resolution No. 05-95 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 585 586 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 587 588 There was none. 589 590 NEW BUSINESS 591 592 There was none. 593 594 COMMUNITY CALENDAR JULY 12, 2005 THROUGH JULY 25, 2005: 595 596 A) Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 5:30 p.m., Planning and Zoning Board Meeting 10597 B) Thursday, July 14, 2005, 7:00 a.m., EDAC 598 C) Wednesday, July 20, 2005, 5:30 p.m., Council Work Session 599 D) Monday, July 25, 2005, 6:30 p.m., City Council Meeting 600 601 ADJOURN 602 603 There being no further business, Councilmember Bergeson moved to adjourn at 10:34 p.m. 604 Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. 605 606 Motion carried unanimously. 607 608 609 610 611 Ot- 613 612 tom' Ann B1ai(City Clerk Jo ergeso ,Mayor 614 615 Transcribed by: 616 Cheryl Felix 617 TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 1618 These minutes were considered and approved at the regular Council Meeting, August 22, 2005. 13