HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-021 Council ResolutionCITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 14-21
APPROVING PUD DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT AND
AMENDING UTILITY PHASE BOUNDARY FOR NORTHPOINTE
WHEREAS, the City has received an application for PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary
Plat for NorthPointe hereafter referred to as "Development"; and
WHEREAS, City staff has completed a review of the "Development" based on the plan set
prepared by Carlson McCain dated January 13, 2014 and received by the City on January 13,
2014; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the Planning & Zoning Board on December 11,
2013 and continued to the February 12, 2014 meeting and the Board recommended approval of
the "Development"; and
WHEREAS, the "Development" meets the requirements of the City's Zoning and Subdivision
Ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the "Development" meets the purpose and intent of the PUD -Planned Unit
Development ordinance by encouraging:
• Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic
expansion, greater variety in type, design, architectural standards, and siting of structures
through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments.
• The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as existing
vegetation, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion.
• An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby
lowering development costs and public investments; and
WHEREAS, the PUD -Planned Unit Development provides the following flexibilities:
• Lot size variations from 5,502 s.f. to 21,923 s.f. (Minimum lot size for R-2, Two Family
Residential District is 7,500 s.f.).
• Reduced right of way widths for Streets G, H & K from 60 feet to 50 feet.
• Reduced street pavement width for Streets C (south of Street B), D, E, F, G, H, I, K from
32 feet to 28 feet.
• Reduced corner lot "side" setback from 25 feet to 20 feet for lots along Street G, H and J.
• Five (5) foot side yard setbacks for 50 foot wide lots.
• Mixed residential density development of single family and multi -family.
• Allowance for variation in garage building design standards of the R-2 District requiring:
o All single family dwellings shall have a minimum double garage.
o All single family dwellings shall include a front porch that is covered, unenclosed
and a minimum of 6 feet in depth.
1
o All single family dwelling and garage elevations shall include a variation in
exterior building materials such as brick, stone, rock face, concrete block, wood,
stucco, vinyl, steel, fiber cement and aluminum siding.
o Side or rear loaded garages are permitted. The elevation facing the street shall
require a minimum of one (1) window.
o The garage doors shall incorporate architectural design features such as decorative
windows, panels, hinges, etc.
o Garages in excess of two stalls shall be broken up so the additional stalls are
recessed from the main garage facade.
o Garage width does not exceed 32 feet; and
WHEREAS, the regulations and performance standards of the zoning ordinance and R-2 Two
Family Residential District will be in effect unless otherwise stated in this resolution; and
WHEREAS, these PUD flexibilities are provided to allow for a variety of detached single
family housing products that are in current market demand vs. standard townhome medium
density development. The PUD flexibility also compliments walkable neighborhoods, protects
the greenway corridor and reduces the development footprint and impervious surface area; and
WHEREAS, Outlot C shall be developed in a future phase as an age -restricted (55+ years of
age) multiple family dwelling consistent with the regulations of the R-4, High Density
Residential District with underground parking for 50% of the required stalls and at a density of
20 to 25 dwelling units per acre; and
WHEREAS, future development of Outlot C shall require a PUD Final Plan/Final Plat,
Development Contract and Site Plan Review; and
WHEREAS, the City's Utility Staging Plan establishes the pattern, timing and location of future
growth; and
WHEREAS, the "Development" spans two different Utility Phasing areas (1A and 1B);
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan allows for specific projects to occur early in a five-year
phase within a staging area based on the following criteria:
a. The proposed development must be located within both the current and the next ten-year
staging area, or five-year phase, or located adjacent to the current staging area.
The "Development" spans the 1 A and 1B five-year phase.
b. The proposed development must be master planned. Small, piecemeal developments do
not justify redefining the ten-year staging area, or five-year phase.
The "Development" is a Planned Unit Development master plan.
c. The proposed, master planned project must provide discernable public values.
The "Development" provides discernable public values by meeting the purpose and
intent of the PUD -Planned Unit Development as noted previously in this resolution.
2
d. Adequate infrastructure must be available to support development. Appropriate analysis
will determine if adequate infrastructure is available and what utility extensions and
transportation improvements are required to support new development.
The "Development" is located in Sanitary Sewer District 3 (Sub -district 3C) and is
served by a MCES Interceptor 76-51, a 24 -inch gravity sewer in Cedar Street which is
adequate to support the development.
e. There must be a commitment that the development will pay its proportionate share of
infrastructure improvement costs associated with development.
The Developer shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City committing to pay
its proportionate share of the infrastructure improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Utility Phase 1A boundaries are generally consistent with the "Development"
Phasing Plan Phase I and II boundaries and the Utility Phase 1B boundaries are generally
consistent with the Phasing Plan Phase III and IV boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the "Development" is found to meet the criteria to allow development to occur
early in a five-year phase; and
WHEREAS, a land use application for PUD Final Plan/Final Plat, a Development Contract
detailing escrows and a summary table by lot and block of lot sizes and setbacks shall be
required.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes
hereby approves the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat for NorthPointe, subject to
the following conditions being met prior to approval of the PUD Final Plan/Final Plat:
1. All comments from City Engineer letter dated February 7, 2014 shall be addressed.
2. All comments from Anoka County Highway Department dated January 24, 2014 shall be
addressed.
3. All comments from MNDOT letter dated December 5, 2013 shall be addressed.
4. All comments from Environmental Coordinator letter dated February 3, 2014 shall be
addressed.
5. Approval or Conditional Approval Pending Receipt of Changes (CAPROC) from Rice
Creek Watershed District shall be required.
6. A summary table created in Microsoft Excel by lot and block of lot sizes (gross,
unbuildable and net area) and setbacks (front, rear and side) shall be required.
7. The Phasing Plan for development shall be incorporated into the plan set and listed on the
Sheet Index.
8. The Phasing Plan identifies 215 lots, however; the preliminary plat indicates 216 lots.
The Phasing Plan shall be revised.
9. The Floodplain Exhibit shall be incorporated into the plan set and listed on the Sheet
Index.
10. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be obtained from the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) prior to issuance of any building permits for parcels
located within the floodplain.
3
11. Temporary cul de sacs shall be required where a street is terminated pending future
extension.
12. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated over stormwater drainage areas.
13. Drainage and utility easements or conservation easements shall be dedicated over
wetland buffer areas as required by Rice Creek Watershed District.
14. Outlots A, B, D, E, F, and G shall be deeded to the City.
15. The City and developer shall analyze different options for improvements to Cedar Street
West in regards to bituminous overlay and street width.
16. The Developer shall grade the park in accordance with the approved grading plan and
provide top soil and seed per City specifications.
17. Sheet 3, Preliminary Plat Index:
a. Site Data shall be revised to reflect 12 Future Single Family Lots.
b. Total Number of Lots and Densities shall be revised accordingly.
18. Sheet 6, Preliminary Plat:
a. Lot 1, Block 8 and Lot 9, Block 10 shall be revised to omit the portion of Outlot
G that extends to Street I and a 20 feet easement shall be provided over the storm
sewer utility.
b. Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 11 shall have a 15 foot wide easement abutting
CSAH 54 for landscape buffer.
19. Sheet 9, Ghost Plat:
a. The City suggests future access through Outlot E if feasible. The current proposal
creates a disconnect within the development.
20. Sheets 10 & 11, Preliminary Site & Utility Plan:
a. Front and rear setback line for 65'-70' wide lots shall be shown as 25 feet.
Building pads may remain designed at 30 feet.
b. Rear setback line for 50' wide lot shall be shown as 25 feet. Building pads may
remain designed at 30 feet.
c. Verify that lots along Streets G, H and J require 20 foot side setbacks vs. 25 foot
setback.
21. Sheet 14, Preliminary Grading & Erosion Control Plan:
a. The garage location shall be reversed to meet the 5 foot side setback on Lot 7,
Block 8 and Lot 22, Block 7.
22. Sheet 18, Preliminary Grading & Erosion Control Plan:
a. The trail needs to meet the RCWD Rule F.6.(7)(iii), requiring that the linear
surface must be 25' from the wetland edge.
23. Sheet L1, Planting Plan:
a. Remove comment that "Blvd Trees to be installed by Builder @ Time of Home
Construction".
b. City will require tree escrow and will install boulevard trees.
24. Sheet L2, Planting Plan:
a. Remove comment that "Blvd Trees to be installed by Builder @ Time of Home
Construction".
b. City will require tree escrow and will install boulevard trees.
25. Sheet L3, Planting Plan Buffer Enlargement:
a. Please verify landscape buffer plantings are allowed in NSP easement.
26. Sheet L4, Planting Plan:
a. Outlot G shall be added to the Open Area Landscape calculations.
b. 245 Boulevard Trees are required but the Plant Schedule adds up to 244. Please
revise.
4
c. The Schedule for Buffers and Open Areas shall be separated.
d. The Schedule for Open Space and Replacement Trees may be combined.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby
approves amending the boundaries of the Utility Staging Plan Phase 1 A to match the
"Development" Phasing Plan Phase I and II boundaries attached hereto as Exhibit A. The
"Development" Phasing plan shall dictate and supersede the Comprehensive Plan Utility Staging
Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes hereby
approves that Outlot C shall be developed in a future phase as an age -restricted (55+ years of
age) multiple family dwelling consistent with the regulations of the R-4, High Density
Residential District with underground parking for 50% of the required stalls and at a density of
20 to 25 dwelling units per acre. Future development of Outlot C shall require a PUD Final
Plan/Final Plat, Development Contract and Site Plan Review. The Developer shall record against
Outlot C a declaration or other document stating these requirements.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 10 day of March , 2014.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
Kusterman and was duly seconded by Council Member Roeser and upon
vote being taken thereon, the followingvoted in favor thereof:
Kusterman, Roeser, Raffery, Stoesz, Reinert
The following voted against same:
none
Jeff Reinert, Mayor
ATTEST:
e Bartell, Ci Clerk
STAFF ORIGINATOR:
MEETING DATE:
TOPIC:
VOTE REQUIRED:
INTRODUCTION
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM 6A
Katie Larsen, City Planner
March 10, 2014
NorthPointe
i. Consider First Reading of Ordinance 02-14 to Rezone Property
from R, Rural to PUD -Planned Unit Development
ii. Consider Resolution 14-21 Approving Development Stage
Plan/Preliminary Plat and Amending Utility Phase Boundary
3/5
The proposed development is a PUD residential subdivision located northeast of the
intersection of Birch Street and 20th Avenue South (CSAH 54). After revisions from the
\---Planning & Zoning Board Staff Report, the plat is approximately 94.09 gross acres and consists
of a residential density mix of single family lots and an 88 unit senior multi -family residence.
The following is a breakdown of unit development:
• 216 Single Family Lots
• 12 Future Single Family Lots
• 88 unit multi -family
• 316 TOTAL UNITS
A public hearing was held by the Planning & Zoning Board on December 11, 2013 and
continued to the February 12, 2014 meeting.
The Land Use Application is for the following:
• Rezone property from R, Rural to PUD -Planned Unit Development
• PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat for NorthPointe
Staff Reports from the December 11, 2013 and February 12, 2014 Planning & Zoning Board
meetings provide detailed analysis of the development.
1
BACKGROUND
Rezoning
The property is currently zoned R, Rural and requires rezoning to PUD -Planned Unit
Development. The PUD provides the flexibility from the strict standards of the R-2 Two
Family Residential District as detailed in Resolution No. 14-21. Unless otherwise stated in the
PUD resolution, the regulations and performance standards of the zoning ordinance and R-2
Two Family Residential District will be in effect.
The PUD flexibilities are provided to allow for a variety of detached single family housing
products that are in current market demand vs. standard townhome medium density
development. The PUD flexibility also compliments walkable neighborhoods, protects the
greenway corridor and reduces the development footprint and impervious surface area.
The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the purpose and intent of
the PUD by encouraging:
• Innovations in development that address growing demands for all styles of economic
expansion, greater variety in type, design, architectural standards, and siting of
structures through the conservation and more efficient use of land in such
developments.
• The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as existing
vegetation, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion.
• An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby
lowering development costs and public investments.
Density Calculations
Gross Area (acres)
94.09
Wetland
9.56
Conservation Easements
0.68*
Arterial ROW
0.26
Park Dedication
5.04
Net Area (acres)
78.55
# of Units
316
Gross Density (units/acre)
3.36
Net Density (units/acre)
4.02
*Acreage may change pending final Rice Creek Watershed District approval
2
The property is guided for Medium Density per the City's Comprehensive Plan which requires
a net density of 4.0 to 5.9 dwelling units per acre. The proposed plan of 4.02 units per acre is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's guided land use and density.
Concerns were brought forward at the public hearing regarding the medium density. It is
important to note the developer is required to develop at 4.0 to 5.9 units per acre per the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development at 4.02 units per acre is the lowest end of the
medium density spectrum. The highest medium density allowed at 5.9 units per acre could
create 463 total units which is 147 units more than proposed. The PUD flexibility is not
creating anymore density than is allowed. The flexibility actually allows for the lowest possible
medium density and single family detached homes. It should also be noted that of the 216
single family lots proposed in the preliminary plat, 186 of them exceed the minimum R-2
requirements for lot width (60 feet) and lot size (7,500 s.f.).
The proposed project will also require a City Council resolution to amend the five (5) year
Utility Staging Area boundaries since the site spans two different areas (1A and 1 B).
Subdivision Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan
The PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat has been reviewed for compliance with the
comprehensive plan, zoning and subdivision ordinance. The proposed development is not
considered premature and meets the performance standards of the subdivision and zoning
ordinance. The City will require a combination of land dedication and cash in lieu of land. The
proposal dedicates 5.04 acres of parkland and trail which will be deeded to the City. A Tree
Inventory Report, Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan have been submitted which
identifies existing trees, trees to be removed, new plantings, basic use area, natural resource
conservation area and natural resource protected area. The Landscape Plan identifies required
Boulevard Trees, Buffer/Screen Plantings, Open Area Calculations and Replacement Tree
Schedule. The applicant has started the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) process with the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to verify the floodplain is not impacted by
development.
A Traffic Impact Study was prepared by Westwood Professional Services (November 2013) on
behalf of the developer to analyze traffic impacts along 20th Avenue South (CSAH 54).
Conclusions from the study indicate the intersections at 20th Avenue South and Cedar Street
and 20th Avenue South and Street A will operate at a Level of Service A (LOS A) in the 2019
No -build and 2019 Build conditions. The report notes a northbound and southbound turn lane is
required at 20th Avenue South and Street A per Anoka County standards.
Anoka County Highway Department has provided a comment letter dated January 24, 2014. In
general, the County's comments relate to required additional right of way, proper sight
distance, turn lane construction along CSAH 54 and appropriate noise mitigation. Right of way
has been dedicated per the plat. Trees are being removed within the CSAH 54 right of way to
provide proper sight distances. Turn lanes are being analyzed at both Cedar Street and Street A
with final approval required by the County. A noise mitigation analysis is being prepared by the
developer. In addition, a landscape buffer is being planted in the rear yards abutting CSAH 54.
3
Lino Lakes, Centerville and the developer are also analyzing different options for
improvements to Cedar Street West in regards to bituminous overlay and street width.
Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR)
The project site is within the 2005 I -35E Corridor AUAR and is subject to the AUAR
mitigation plan. The proposed development is consistent with development Scenario 1 for
residential medium density and complies with the mitigation plan in regards to wetlands, water
use, erosion and sedimentation, surface water runoff, wastewater and transportation. The
AUAR requires developers to follow all appropriate guidelines and policies related to traffic
noise and noise walls. A noise analysis shall be submitted by the developer in accordance to
MPCA regulations which takes into consideration both I -35E and CSAH 54.
Age -Restricted Multiple Family Dwelling
Oudot C shall be developed in a future phase as an age -restricted multiple family dwelling
consistent with the regulations of the R-4, High Density Residential District with underground
parking for 50% of the required stalls and at a density of 20 to 25 dwelling units per acre.
Future development of the outlot shall require a PUD Final Plan/Final Plat, Development
Contract and Site Plan Review.
Final Plat
A land use application for PUD Final Plan/Final Plat, a Development Contract detailing
escrows and a summary table by lot and block of lot sizes and setbacks shall be required.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning & Zoning Board held a public hearing on December 11, 2013 and continued the
hearing to the February 12, 2014 meeting. The Board and staff recommend approval of the
Rezoning and PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat for NorthPointe subject to the
conditions listed in Resolution 14-21.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Site Location Map
2. Aerial Map
3. Ordinance 02-14
4. Resolution 14-21
5. PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat
4
:il�ililll
Ill
I I
{
1111::1::1
::1111III
Imo, � I��H 1.
0LL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0I
N
0
l0
0
• •w 11..
0 0
0
0 IL
0
0
0
co
ILQ
O
N
0
co
0
0
0)
O
1
1
t
co
c
m
0
03
Q
Q y
It as
•- 13-
x
w
n
a)
c
a)
E
a
I
•
•
}
4111Matint __
3SF ON WINO/H 3Cbls
40441
J
ETFITT=." eal
L
owl
1
atrir-41
munmk
NIA
BIRCH -STREET
am
est Quarter of Se
Northeast Quarter of the
SITE DATA
n ^ W
Nd
O to
r T U 2
>-
4 J <
z O
Witt' W LI"L.< ai WklyW U'?
JJ m2u, 18 1- I <o O
wel_RMZO 2,2y�1g Zr ZOZ a Qg NyN�
in
JJJJJ d K L W/al LIJ <Inp_1asG LI c, Z W
««g� 1 t4 11a�A�1 FsrQrQ W� 2 aO
FOFO OOOFC»a 45 ZOW 8
8 aWat
— —
2
tW
N O5
N
Z gr
H40* fWO
K
gwww
ERR? Ls
N �
ffi
6
H V
Eusw
Wa
a
0
rr;7
LJ
N
1-11-17-1
I _11„11
I II II
LJLJ L J
3.6Z.BI.00S
Orel L
FF-1E1E1E1r11-
I II II II II II
I N I IN IA I IN IA 110..) I
LJLJLJLJLJL
✓ Ire
Im 11N 1
1^ II^1
L JLJ
0 133815
I3
O
0
0,0°1 X11 p
1 133815
00'5
.BO.LZ
.J
r 133816
1 )0 1
L _ _ J
L .
,11-71 J
• I 11 I
II II I
o II� 11N 1
1- II' 11-
gg5
0
N
.9f.Sl.IZ:
S 9.61(F
3
1
1
S
3
1
N
L - J
ririri
IN 11- I I
1'11^I
LJLJLJ
9
\ \\
\\ ` \•
r-
0 )D 1
L�__J
3.6Z,9400S
LT* lS
9l'09S
M6Z 940ON
0
0
00•Q
M.90,f2
LJ
L
r--
I m
L - - J
_
L
L
E
11n rn Io
1`0 II I�
_JlL_ L _
'3 ---
4
I r---1 \\ s N r---1 1 1 l it 4 I r 70 I
1 m 1 1
=17
�,
J z
0z
( )O
a
SS
gi
tO
:m m 0041 I
r-
0
5 8
kV
0
1-
w
w
x
N
Lu
w
N
I
W' I '
II p
1 I' i .I � 8
i ,
INII IL
�1 1'
I<II
1011 v 1
IU?I I 1
,
1I
_
I I I
I 1i I S
II II II I
II g
II
III I
I II 1
1
NI
mv�I I
- II
I
II ii
I II I
1 II 1
I
I 1 _
1 I B 1
I I
I I I I
I
1
1 I
1 I III i I
1 1 i
1
1 `
1116
I I 9If
I
I
I
1
I 1
141
I � �
I I� iii I
II
1114
1 II /
I 15 A
1iII
1�I 1
a1 i
1 I,
0��1 fI I'II -1
I � J
I
T
I
a \
\`
\\ \ \
\\ \ \b \
\ \\
q,
1
J
V
Lfr
a
J
r T�"\T'
(�-`TT1
C
I.
J
a \
\`
\\ \ \
\\ \ \b \
\ \\
q,
1
J
V
Lfr
a
J
r T�"\T'
(�-`TT1
r
oJj
�r
•
1 N
LO(1)
(921.0)
(920.5)
LO(1)
927.5 G
a
928.0 G
J
(920.5)
LO
928.0 G
L__ -J
%OS 0_oo.c
1348.1.s _ S _ 'o soo.z _
—+ - 25.0
£'9Z 9'92
0 s'L16
(L)oi
0 cab
(x)01
0.126
s'£Z6
(918.5)
925.0 G
(918.5)
(919.0)
925.5 G
J
YOE YOS'0
%IT o,y YOOZ
0'Z�
092
0 9'SZ6
(L)oi
0 9'9Z6
0 0'516
0 9'026
r,-- -1 r---1
0'916 0
-'926 0
9'LZ6 0
2
0'616)
(0'616)
(s'616)
I I
(0'016)
0
Z
0
\ \ \\
\..., % \
\ ..,..%--
_ _- \
\—
\\ \
\ % a \
\\ \ a \
\ % ` \
a \\
VI
L
J
\ \ \\
\..., % \
\ ..,..%--
_ _- \
\—
\\ \
\ % a \
\\ \ a \
\ % ` \
a \\
0
004
23.3 1.5O%
0
mS,
7
b
K\
R0
a
(927.0)
(927.0)
(926.0)
4\d/fr"
Yo�Y 9' Yxos o
932.5 G
oo., 11332LLS so`s•o�,tsas
sz£ 6 t
i
oaz
Z• IC
1934.5 G
WO
934.5 G
G 934.
W0 1
(926.5)
(927.0)
(927.0)
r 1332i1S
r
Sittig\ \ \\\
\ \ \ \
\
I l \ \ \
IF� J1 LV '\
\ \ ,
\ \
J
•
c
2
a
0 OM l£6
, LOM`
0 S•0£6
L
o
133dJ.S
S'6Z
7
I I
0 0'Z£6
OM
0 0`l£6
(L )0M
!c•avcl
0 0'l£6
(L)OM
!c a7Al
0 0•L£6
(L)0M
STU 1 S•£Z6 "
6) i
(03,Z6) ilk' °(o iz6) 'l
OM I I OM OM
S'Of6 S•0£6 0
.pinximor
P1t 04
/\ (L)o(c 7. l.J,V
0'L£6
L)OM
S'l£6
OM
Cows)
O
F
O
N K
2m
w
pp
m d
ro
<
Q
-
a
i S I
O X
-di
rc i
CY�
du
c vq
o v o
p ypoppb;4
Bbii
iiii
sm;e
E
a
`r
:U�16
ie
a
k
' tB
oo2
oY
ax a
agg2
s
---,
'
Natural Resource
Conservation
Area or Naturel
Resource Corridor
Enhancement
Area
Natural Resource
Protected Area
\
0
2
ra
\ \\
LO
§1 )(
kk \;
\(
40
W (§�
j\\
§ r -I k§§ rm0
&B:* F- ``§
.F! um K:»
n 2 L4 2 3 @f
2b! 22;
2
O
0
0
` s ■ ■k| B §
§ 0 / §0 2; $ e q§
§`B2 �®
§B x §§®/ ./ ( §RP
w■ w�B!■|�K�E & wg, .g
k
)
|
■
csi
QUAKING ASPEN
(
k
«■
Ai*
C4cia
21
IMM LANDSCAPE LEGEND
COMEEROUS TREES
Picea glouca densato 1 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE
8
AUSTRIAN PINE
U
ORNAMENTAL TREES
Malus 'Red Jewel' RED JEWEL CRAB
Pinus nigra
iii.,0
3
O
U
0
6
2
Populus tremuloides
e
e
0
1.0
W
1 J
•
(Ni II
II m
w�
w�
0)
j f M
X X
N N
II
• u_ u
N N
0 0
0 0
,NN
W W
(n ! n
0 0
N N
O O
I) to
1 i in
II II
mm
• 0 0
I
• 0
0 0
0
0)
m
O)
0)
I W II
Z II
0 w
J F_
LAI
CO
N X
0 CO
0) II
00
to O
O
wW
Nco
( n
O tt
M
• N
M
c0(1
11 11
0 0
0 0 •
I- I-
D D
0 0
N
W
W
1-
J
CO
•
..
II
•
•
•
I I
(n
CO
D
CO 0)
LLI
NLAJ UJ
0 I-
tn
(ri
N
II
3 11
Z W
?� W
O K
J M
m X X
N r r
0 II II
• 0 0
x)00
IN N
(/)(Wn N
0 0 X
cCO0 (f)X
O Ln X
N X
II II II
www
O 0 0
I- I- I-
D 0
0 0 0
SHRUBS = 39
m
N
W =
W (n
cc
1—
N
N II
11 co
cnm
W
C
F- N
M
X X
11 11
0
\ \
N N
t o LO
00 co
0) 0)
II II
w W
0 0
I- I-
D D
0 0
AMERICAN UNDER
0
E
0
m
E
= 137 TREES
= 412 SHRUBS
(n
Q
Q
w
<
Q Z
Z W
W 0 -
EL
W O
0
0
W
Z
J
a
w
m
O
I-
N
CO
D
COM
TREES TO BE PLANTED IN
I- • I-
O 0
EEN LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS
(n
w
w
a
0
w z
0 II
W W
a0 Z
V)cr
�
J• J w
2- N 0
6 II a
-sow
min o
0 I• X
W
II W Q
Lj
Qa 0
N
H ~ 0
o0 Z
N OJ
0 Z0 Q
OO W
LARGE ORNAMENTAL TREES
Ld
z
W
a
0
Ln
Lu
LL
Li
0
LL
W
J
0
LANDSCAPE LEGEND
CONIFEROUS TREES
/''q
l • is Picea glauca densato _ BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 6' HT. 129
1
~x
Malus 'PRAIRIE FIRE° PRAIRIE FIRE CRAB 12. BB 137
P2
N
E
E
n
m
N
N
N
n
SWAMP WHITE OAK
o
0
Quercus bicolor
Quercus rubra
11ilia americana
Betula nitro
ri
Pinus sylvestris SCOTCH PINE 6'
ORNAMENTAL TREES
0
AUSTRIAN PINE
NANNYBERRY VIBURNUM
CARDINAL DOGWOOD
,
N
E
8.
12
E
Comas sericea 'Cardinal'
N
N
„,
N N
Pinus nigra
4ec.
.1
x
ul
x
&
2c
4*O
NEMO LANDSCAPE LEGEND
€
rn
N
I I
I
8
g
E
m E
m
N
G
M
N g
N N
N
QUAKING ASPEN
SWAMP WHITE OAK
NORTHERN RED OAK
AMERICAN LINDEN
m
/P
1
I
Quercus bicolor
Quercus rubra
Tilia americana
0
i
:tQ6
(0
/41 IVA
0f
z
V
1 COMMON NAME (SIZE 1 ROOT 1 CRY. 1 RCIMKS
N
-
I
E
E
E m
E
FALL FIESTA SUGAR MAPLE
Lli
g
SIENNA GLEN MAPLE
HACKBERRY
CATALPA
m
E
-
d
?
n
PLANT SCHEDULE FOR REPLACEMENT TREES
LANDSCAPE LEGEND
KEY 1 BOTANICAL NAME (COMMON NAME !SIZE 1 RooT 1 Ort. I ROAM
II DECIDUOUS TREES
TA
•�../
Populus tremubides QUAKING ASPEN #5 CORP 106
P2
N
E
E
E
E
N
N
N
N
SWAMP WHITE OAK
NORTHERN RED OAK
AMERICAN LINDEN
RNER BIRCH
Quercus bicolor
Quercus rubra
11ilia americana
Betula nitro
AN
0
g
i
T
m 1
U
1 g
I
DECIDUOUS <REES
_
Acer saccharum 'Bailsta' FALL FIESTA SUGAR MAPLE 2.5' BB 2
,
N
E
E
m E
N
N
„,
N N
3
SIENNA GLEN MAPLE
.1
x
ul
x
&
Celtic occidentalis
Catalpa speciosa
4*O
0
1
kr-
ate
REPLACEMENT TREE REQUIREMENTS
CO
CO
- N
II II
0 0
CC o
o O
d
w1.1.1
LAJ
H ▪ I -
w w
Q Q
CC CC
ww
fi
39
£ ON V4INDIH . LVISa.31Nl
111v111tunnisW
d,
momenitw wog
Witionoi
�, Nt����yy gal�git
Aisol
:4 MIMI*
iuI1i III v 0
a% -- �� - 33211 w v
� 6a