Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-070 Council ResolutionCITY OF LINO LAKES RESOLUTION NO. 02-70 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR A PROPOSED EXPANSION OF EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE COMPANY, LOCATED AT 7512 -4TH AVENUE WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a Site Plan Review for the expansion of Emergency Apparatus Maintenance (EAM), and WHEREAS, the City's zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations provide for and establish standards for Site Plan Review in Section 2, subdiv. 5, and WHEREAS, the proposed Site Plan Review meets the above described standards, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Lino Lakes City Council approves the Site Plan Review for EAM as described by the plans and documents stamped as received June 3, 2002. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following conditions of approval apply: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to any construction. 2. Permits be obtained by Rice Creek Watershed prior to any site work or issuance of building permits. 3. Cut sheets showing a lighting fixture choice meeting City Ordinance (shoebox style, no -spill), as well as a revised photometric lighting plan which reflects the new choice of fixture style, must be submitted prior to issuance of any building permits. 4. Trash/dumpsters must be enclosed within a six-foot high fence of wall. Elevation plans of the enclosure must be submitted prior to issuance of any building permits. $fit Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this - da of -a, 2002. ATTEST: .� % Pax._ Ann $31ir, City Clerk IIS/ J. B - geson, Mayor Resolution No. 02-70 Councilmember Dahl introduced Resolution No. 02-70 and moved its adoption. The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Reinert and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Reinert, Dahl, Bergeson, and Carlson (O'Donnell absent). The following voted against same: None. Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted. CERTIFICATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 02-70 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ANOKA ) CITY OF LINO LAKES ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the attached document is a true copy of Resolution No. 02-70 with the original thereof on file in the City Clerk's office, and the same is a full, true and complete copy insofar as the same relates to: RESOLUTION NO. 02-70 APPROVING A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR A PROPOSED EXPANSION OF EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE COMPANY, LOCATED AT 7512 - 4TH AVENUE. Witness my hand as said City Clerk and the Corporate Seal of the City this 10th day of July, 2002. (SEAL) AGENDA ITEM 7C STAFF ORIGINATOR: Tanda Gretz/Jeff Smyser C.C. MEETING DATE: July 8, 2002 TOPIC: Site Plan Review for the proposed expansion of Emergency Apparatus Maintenance Co. ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote BACKGROUND Emergency Apparatus Maintenance, located at 7512-4t Avenue, is a company that repairs and customizes equipment used by fire departments. The current 5,600 sq. ft. building was approved in 1996 with plans which indicated an area for future expansion. The company would now like to expand into the area indicated in the 1996 plans, and has submitted an application for a Site Plan Review. ANALYSIS Site Description The site is a 1.12 acre triangular piece of property located to the east of 4th Avenue within the Lino Industrial Park. Superior Masonry & Concrete abuts the site to the north, with Nol-Tec located to the south. City Council Meeting July 8, 2002 EAM Site Plan Review Land Use Compatibility The following chart summarizes the land use (according to the proposed 2001 Land Use map) and zoning surrounding the site: Direction Land Use Zoning Site Industrial General Industrial North Industrial General Industrial South Industrial General Industrial East Industrial General Industrial West Public/Semi-Public (prison) Public (prison) Building Issues The existing building measures 5,273 sq.ft. The proposed addition will be located to the east of the current building and measure 5,450 sq.ft. The expanded area will be used exclusively as repair bays. Building elevations show the proposed addition matching the existing building in terms of color and materials, which is rock face concrete block. Building height is similar as well. Setbacks The following chart describes the required and proposed setbacks for the site. Setback Required Proposed Principle Structure — from street 50 feet 60 feet Principle Structure — side yard 10 feet 10 feet Principle Structure — rear yard 15 feet 15 feet Parking — from street 15 feet 15 feet Parking — from side yard 10 feet 10 feet Parking — from rear yard 5 feet 10 feet 2 City Council Meeting July 8, 2002 EAM Site Plan Review Parking/Access Issues A new 30' wide access drive is proposed onto 4th Avenue. Parking for the original building was calculated at one stall for each employee (6), with nine stalls actually constructed. There are now ten employees, with proposed plans showing a total of 19 stalls to actually be constructed. City Ordinance requires light manufacturing areas to provide "one space for each employee or one space for each 2,000 feet of gross floor area, whichever is greater." A minimum of ten parking stalls are thus required for the site, calculating one stall for each employee. Grading/Drainage/Utility The applicant has submitted a preliminary Grading, Erosion Control and Drainage plan. City Engineer Jim Studenski reports that all grading and drainage issues have been resolved to his satisfaction. Rice Creek Watershed Recommendations Rice Creek Watershed has issued a TWAFAA for the proposed project pending receipt of several administrative items, including: 1.) Incorporation of infiltration practices. 2.) Existing versus proposed swale capacity narrative. 3.) Revegetation specifications for incorporated infiltration BMP's (best management practices). Lighting Submitted plans show wall pack style fixtures, which do not comply with City Ordinance lighting standards. The applicant has been directed to use shoebox style, no -spill fixtures which will deliver meter readings within City standards (<1 foot candle on public streets). Landscaping City Ordinance allows impervious surface coverage up to 90% in a General Industrial Zone. No landscaping is proposed, and staff is not recommending any as the addition is located behind the original structure and is surrounded by similar industrial uses. Trash Enclosure The trash dumpster servicing the original building is located in the area planned for expansion and, as a result, will have to be moved to a new location. Original plans City Council Meeting July 8, 2002 EAM Site Plan Review approved a dumpster without an enclosure; instead four pine trees at the rear of the lot were installed. Since the pine trees are only approximately three feet high and offer no real screening of an otherwise exposed dumpster, and since the previous trash arrangements were made under a previous Ordinance, staff will require that the dumpster be enclosed, as required under Section 3, subd. 4.G.2.c of the current ordinance. Sprinkling/Fire Suppression The building is required to be sprinkled. Review of the fire suppression system will be handled as a building inspection issue. CONCLUSION Plans for the original EAM building, approved in 1996, identify an area to the east of the building to be used for future expansion. The current application describes a 5,450 sq.ft. addition to match the original building, for use as repair bays. Staff would recommend approval of the application, with the following conditions: 1.) Proper building permits be obtained prior to any construction. 2.) Permits be obtained by Rice Creek Watershed prior to any site work or issuance of building permits. 3.) Cut sheets showing a lighting fixture choice meeting City Ordinance (shoebox style, no -spill), as well as a revised photometric lighting plan which reflects the new choice of fixture style, must be submitted prior to issuance of building permits. 4.) Trash/dumpsters must be enclosed within a six-foot high fence or wall. Elevation plans of the enclosure must be submitted prior to issuance of building permits. P & Z RECOMMENDATION The above report was presented at the June 12, 2002 meeting of the Planning & Zoning Board. After consideration of the issues, Board members voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Site Plan Review, with conditions noted by staff. OPTIONS 1.) Approve the Site Plan Review application, with conditions. 2.) Deny the Site Plan Review application. 3.) Return to staff with direction 4 City Council Meeting July 8, 2002 EAM Site Plan Review RECOMMENDATION Option #1. ATTACHMENTS 1.) General Location Map 2.) Site Plan 3.) Floor Plan 4.) Wall Sections 5.) Elevation Plan 6.) Foundation Plan 7.) Preliminary Grading, Erosion Control & Drainage Plan it - 9-TREH a . mei rtor a PARK 7 6 OF 4V+40 PL-14fi 11691292 -R -E-5 111111 1 It 11ggiigigig 110 411 ill iiimbro PO t4100 E a 0 0� .4. 1IILIrj1i!1111111 EXHIBIT # 1 ELEMENTARY s r� SCHOOL taciftillisCFStrati:a.":111 2'iWAg$L lthirA a- 0 0 . 1N: M,L_ , IiwIr d� Qlgas I tioaavo i..2a3 PRIUM� oa�I�A FitirrA"41 cww, ; Ir SUS. posErf =134 NORTH e , 4,$'2111 Egm . qO"' • Q9 �m.�d "e "MUM Itli6a=11.11 AM :an Xra •�it� 4-4 IRMi ES[ 13 2 Q . Fan'• ECM ars R _ I 4 LINO L LAKES 4 3 12 m 1 1 STATE -11422K 11 ♦ APOLLO IMIS/NESS PA NO 1 /i O REHABILITATION CENTE k NEKIRMALIMA 1.‘14, / I EXHIBIT # ---:—Aguiwow.mtc.-gsevaz wiliagvajmnamz.: -7: • .47;114ii.oiirivieJeasms:—,7 • "VicliwerZEigrt7 111 A8 NINVIKI VIA220•4190 .117.41 JAM 7.710.0511KPIKTIVaric51- ---Tr-jia(Virirwodkr-1"."547:4-111:2--: ONR133NIDN 22e 32 WM= 4/. EXHIBIT # •-•*9 g I2 e MV/SE" 31r0 I 'U AB NMYt r,onw1 •rn..wa -1: NIII'3aN1;]NH �..: 2Ia -IDSId -+s�Q.y)�}�� letERT'.s urs 11a090.1010 w cif T J. ..n MA gown 1Wirnyemytersot rt. • N I AVM M MOON NN.M.•N. AMMO IN -- • • , • r u C ti•4.1 C % tiM % I3 I • ' r• --_ 2:5Z.1MFATIA M RKIItid �_' -`3►0141QeIANIFi' 1,4 STI, area I 11171 •d Aa NMMdO •o .o;Li V1OWP#4 '111Y4 IWO DND13HNIDN3 �vo11 1w nom vs IN NI •na imam us %3%C t' • a +I gof • 1 .de! P-4. =mom "(... O.* aLVCI iilt-ra^r AO NMV110 01011010101 von yi ca4.11. • -.(siK:11149 - • - r-- DNfliaamorsra • ro.Lyvved.Y. Arra.tra.N.3. .AC1.0911: '1aHDSId Mar= .8/kV o .%7 moo 110100.11111 i0 15150 .0114 40 111401 MIL IMMO TIINIWRIV 41144011031. 01.14 .• I 41001 0014.444404 AMMO AO MOM 110 F. IS 04111•40104 4014 10005 00 1.010010404•1111.41.1 0•101.1.4444 40001 i 4 Ij 1 1 +riff IF I • Jlj.:;1 • :9 50 ,1 JJ -z• 7 ; . :g 2. $ F. ll 4 el. i 1., 114 t Id ii - ,o. 1-4 1 ..- :•" .n. ... \, 1II '.• ..:IIIIIH!IIIill: :; .. -,•t• i! :'! ,H I' • -7 •".• li. H-; i • c . ; lat.! • li . , pil,i • ." .1 '.: • ' ' :!i % 1 .1, . • il • •I'. ;i : 'l ' i. li il 1' •; • . :i : '• ! 'l II . • I • !i . • t • • " : . : ; • • I PLIN AU . 13 • ; 1,.•,!• •, 1 i , ' I . ! 1••••::: 3 z -4) t "n 1y 2e_ a a-£ 31313 I 777 Aa NMYIIO 11W tS 41.1 • 011 S/u"moldy Am/Gat/ YLO1 M flq •7,Va 111Ya olintautsItotia 2IaHDSId �rl>'4G TM •- 7 non.. l0 mu 111 NS ...I NY ew aT .ru,m ATM . w 1 1.1L IITV 110•18.16/111 ua+$I UWIT0 TO i1 M&IWO. TM/1104111 YO 1101/.01-0.IO'OY1a ML MKT LALOlD LR11i01 • • J • d 2. • iU IN 'Wait- - /- \• • • 1 L. r 4 %P1 tit£ O1.•£ n 1 1! 111,.1 .O 6 1I— j .0•,1 V .514' LW E Lobo - 12S C.S!' i fK- St h¢ru 7 i'' J • * t •1 N fto 114 j r•� ti. 331? : . i vaa • , z < A, �, .Q z Y j t Y"^ •— , ,O a: x— -.4 IL's a -Sk, ,11w u.] �• 7y -i.�b �i A$ Ls:• ,; ‘r rllt'Itno:fe h p i[St'fl'•mlc.n ddt Sa i ii urj RRSZUI(cr�d� p;I'