HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-070 Council ResolutionCITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 02-70
RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN REVIEW
FOR A PROPOSED EXPANSION OF EMERGENCY APPARATUS
MAINTENANCE COMPANY,
LOCATED AT 7512 -4TH AVENUE
WHEREAS, the City has received an application for a Site Plan Review for the
expansion of Emergency Apparatus Maintenance (EAM), and
WHEREAS, the City's zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations provide for and
establish standards for Site Plan Review in Section 2, subdiv. 5, and
WHEREAS, the proposed Site Plan Review meets the above described standards,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Lino Lakes City Council approves
the Site Plan Review for EAM as described by the plans and documents stamped as
received June 3, 2002.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following conditions of approval apply:
1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to any construction.
2. Permits be obtained by Rice Creek Watershed prior to any site work or issuance of
building permits.
3. Cut sheets showing a lighting fixture choice meeting City Ordinance (shoebox style,
no -spill), as well as a revised photometric lighting plan which reflects the new choice
of fixture style, must be submitted prior to issuance of any building permits.
4. Trash/dumpsters must be enclosed within a six-foot high fence of wall. Elevation
plans of the enclosure must be submitted prior to issuance of any building permits.
$fit
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this - da of -a, 2002.
ATTEST:
.� % Pax._
Ann $31ir, City Clerk
IIS/
J. B - geson, Mayor
Resolution No. 02-70
Councilmember Dahl introduced Resolution No. 02-70 and moved its adoption.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Reinert and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
Reinert, Dahl, Bergeson, and Carlson (O'Donnell absent).
The following voted against same:
None.
Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted.
CERTIFICATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 02-70
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF ANOKA )
CITY OF LINO LAKES )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Lino Lakes,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that the attached document is a true copy of Resolution No.
02-70 with the original thereof on file in the City Clerk's office, and the same is a full,
true and complete copy insofar as the same relates to:
RESOLUTION NO. 02-70 APPROVING A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR A
PROPOSED EXPANSION OF EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE
COMPANY, LOCATED AT 7512 - 4TH AVENUE.
Witness my hand as said City Clerk and the Corporate Seal of the City this 10th day of
July, 2002.
(SEAL)
AGENDA ITEM 7C
STAFF ORIGINATOR: Tanda Gretz/Jeff Smyser
C.C. MEETING DATE: July 8, 2002
TOPIC: Site Plan Review for the proposed expansion
of Emergency Apparatus Maintenance Co.
ACTION REQUIRED: 3/5 vote
BACKGROUND
Emergency Apparatus Maintenance, located at 7512-4t Avenue, is a company that
repairs and customizes equipment used by fire departments. The current 5,600 sq. ft.
building was approved in 1996 with plans which indicated an area for future expansion.
The company would now like to expand into the area indicated in the 1996 plans, and has
submitted an application for a Site Plan Review.
ANALYSIS
Site Description
The site is a 1.12 acre triangular piece of property located to the east of 4th Avenue within
the Lino Industrial Park. Superior Masonry & Concrete abuts the site to the north, with
Nol-Tec located to the south.
City Council Meeting
July 8, 2002
EAM Site Plan Review
Land Use Compatibility
The following chart summarizes the land use (according to the proposed 2001 Land Use
map) and zoning surrounding the site:
Direction
Land Use
Zoning
Site
Industrial
General Industrial
North
Industrial
General Industrial
South
Industrial
General Industrial
East
Industrial
General Industrial
West
Public/Semi-Public
(prison)
Public
(prison)
Building Issues
The existing building measures 5,273 sq.ft. The proposed addition will be located to the
east of the current building and measure 5,450 sq.ft. The expanded area will be used
exclusively as repair bays.
Building elevations show the proposed addition matching the existing building in terms
of color and materials, which is rock face concrete block. Building height is similar as
well.
Setbacks
The following chart describes the required and proposed setbacks for the site.
Setback
Required
Proposed
Principle Structure —
from street
50 feet
60 feet
Principle Structure —
side yard
10 feet
10 feet
Principle Structure —
rear yard
15 feet
15 feet
Parking — from street
15 feet
15 feet
Parking — from side yard
10 feet
10 feet
Parking — from rear yard
5 feet
10 feet
2
City Council Meeting
July 8, 2002
EAM Site Plan Review
Parking/Access Issues
A new 30' wide access drive is proposed onto 4th Avenue.
Parking for the original building was calculated at one stall for each employee (6), with
nine stalls actually constructed. There are now ten employees, with proposed plans
showing a total of 19 stalls to actually be constructed. City Ordinance requires light
manufacturing areas to provide "one space for each employee or one space for each 2,000
feet of gross floor area, whichever is greater." A minimum of ten parking stalls are thus
required for the site, calculating one stall for each employee.
Grading/Drainage/Utility
The applicant has submitted a preliminary Grading, Erosion Control and Drainage plan.
City Engineer Jim Studenski reports that all grading and drainage issues have been
resolved to his satisfaction.
Rice Creek Watershed Recommendations
Rice Creek Watershed has issued a TWAFAA for the proposed project pending receipt of
several administrative items, including:
1.) Incorporation of infiltration practices.
2.) Existing versus proposed swale capacity narrative.
3.) Revegetation specifications for incorporated infiltration BMP's (best
management practices).
Lighting
Submitted plans show wall pack style fixtures, which do not comply with City Ordinance
lighting standards. The applicant has been directed to use shoebox style, no -spill fixtures
which will deliver meter readings within City standards (<1 foot candle on public streets).
Landscaping
City Ordinance allows impervious surface coverage up to 90% in a General Industrial
Zone. No landscaping is proposed, and staff is not recommending any as the addition is
located behind the original structure and is surrounded by similar industrial uses.
Trash Enclosure
The trash dumpster servicing the original building is located in the area planned for
expansion and, as a result, will have to be moved to a new location. Original plans
City Council Meeting
July 8, 2002
EAM Site Plan Review
approved a dumpster without an enclosure; instead four pine trees at the rear of the lot
were installed.
Since the pine trees are only approximately three feet high and offer no real screening of
an otherwise exposed dumpster, and since the previous trash arrangements were made
under a previous Ordinance, staff will require that the dumpster be enclosed, as required
under Section 3, subd. 4.G.2.c of the current ordinance.
Sprinkling/Fire Suppression
The building is required to be sprinkled. Review of the fire suppression system will be
handled as a building inspection issue.
CONCLUSION
Plans for the original EAM building, approved in 1996, identify an area to the east of the
building to be used for future expansion. The current application describes a 5,450 sq.ft.
addition to match the original building, for use as repair bays. Staff would recommend
approval of the application, with the following conditions:
1.) Proper building permits be obtained prior to any construction.
2.) Permits be obtained by Rice Creek Watershed prior to any site work or issuance of
building permits.
3.) Cut sheets showing a lighting fixture choice meeting City Ordinance (shoebox style,
no -spill), as well as a revised photometric lighting plan which reflects the new choice
of fixture style, must be submitted prior to issuance of building permits.
4.) Trash/dumpsters must be enclosed within a six-foot high fence or wall. Elevation
plans of the enclosure must be submitted prior to issuance of building permits.
P & Z RECOMMENDATION
The above report was presented at the June 12, 2002 meeting of the Planning & Zoning
Board. After consideration of the issues, Board members voted unanimously to
recommend approval of the Site Plan Review, with conditions noted by staff.
OPTIONS
1.) Approve the Site Plan Review application, with conditions.
2.) Deny the Site Plan Review application.
3.) Return to staff with direction
4
City Council Meeting
July 8, 2002
EAM Site Plan Review
RECOMMENDATION
Option #1.
ATTACHMENTS
1.) General Location Map
2.) Site Plan
3.) Floor Plan
4.) Wall Sections
5.) Elevation Plan
6.) Foundation Plan
7.) Preliminary Grading, Erosion Control & Drainage Plan
it - 9-TREH
a
. mei
rtor
a
PARK
7 6
OF 4V+40 PL-14fi 11691292 -R -E-5
111111
1 It
11ggiigigig
110 411 ill iiimbro
PO t4100 E a 0
0� .4.
1IILIrj1i!1111111
EXHIBIT # 1
ELEMENTARY s r�
SCHOOL
taciftillisCFStrati:a.":111
2'iWAg$L
lthirA
a-
0 0
. 1N:
M,L_ ,
IiwIr
d�
Qlgas I
tioaavo i..2a3
PRIUM�
oa�I�A
FitirrA"41
cww,
;
Ir
SUS.
posErf
=134
NORTH
e , 4,$'2111
Egm
. qO"'
• Q9
�m.�d "e
"MUM Itli6a=11.11
AM :an Xra
•�it�
4-4
IRMi
ES[ 13 2 Q .
Fan'• ECM ars
R _
I 4
LINO
L
LAKES
4 3
12
m 1
1
STATE -11422K 11
♦
APOLLO
IMIS/NESS PA
NO 1
/i
O
REHABILITATION CENTE
k
NEKIRMALIMA
1.‘14,
/ I
EXHIBIT #
---:—Aguiwow.mtc.-gsevaz
wiliagvajmnamz.: -7:
• .47;114ii.oiirivieJeasms:—,7
• "VicliwerZEigrt7
111
A8 NINVIKI
VIA220•4190 .117.41 JAM
7.710.0511KPIKTIVaric51-
---Tr-jia(Virirwodkr-1"."547:4-111:2--: ONR133NIDN
22e 32
WM=
4/.
EXHIBIT #
•-•*9 g I2 e
MV/SE" 31r0 I 'U AB NMYt r,onw1 •rn..wa
-1: NIII'3aN1;]NH
�..: 2Ia -IDSId
-+s�Q.y)�}�� letERT'.s urs
11a090.1010 w cif T
J. ..n MA gown 1Wirnyemytersot
rt. • N I AVM
M MOON NN.M.•N. AMMO IN
--
•
•
, •
r
u
C
ti•4.1 C % tiM % I3
I •
'
r•
--_ 2:5Z.1MFATIA M RKIItid �_'
-`3►0141QeIANIFi'
1,4
STI, area I 11171 •d Aa NMMdO
•o
.o;Li
V1OWP#4 '111Y4 IWO
DND13HNIDN3
�vo11
1w
nom vs IN NI •na imam us
%3%C
t'
• a
+I
gof
•
1
.de!
P-4. =mom
"(... O.* aLVCI
iilt-ra^r AO NMV110
01011010101 von
yi ca4.11. •
-.(siK:11149 - • - r-- DNfliaamorsra
• ro.Lyvved.Y. Arra.tra.N.3. .AC1.0911: '1aHDSId
Mar=
.8/kV
o .%7 moo
110100.11111 i0 15150 .0114
40 111401 MIL IMMO TIINIWRIV 41144011031.
01.14 .• I 41001 0014.444404 AMMO
AO MOM 110 F. IS 04111•40104 4014 10005 00
1.010010404•1111.41.1 0•101.1.4444 40001
i 4
Ij
1
1
+riff IF I • Jlj.:;1
•
:9
50
,1
JJ
-z•
7
; .
:g 2.
$ F.
ll 4
el. i
1., 114
t Id
ii -
,o.
1-4 1 ..- :•" .n. ...
\,
1II '.• ..:IIIIIH!IIIill:
:; .. -,•t• i! :'! ,H I'
•
-7 •".• li. H-; i
• c . ; lat.! • li
. , pil,i • ."
.1
'.: • ' ' :!i % 1
.1, . •
il • •I'. ;i : 'l ' i. li
il 1'
•; • . :i : '• ! 'l II
. • I • !i
. • t • • " : . : ;
• • I
PLIN AU .
13
• ;
1,.•,!• •, 1 i , ' I
. !
1••••:::
3
z
-4)
t
"n
1y
2e_
a a-£
31313 I 777 Aa NMYIIO
11W tS 41.1 • 011
S/u"moldy Am/Gat/
YLO1 M flq •7,Va 111Ya
olintautsItotia
2IaHDSId
�rl>'4G TM
•-
7
non.. l0 mu 111
NS ...I NY ew aT .ru,m
ATM . w 1 1.1L IITV 110•18.16/111 ua+$I
UWIT0 TO i1 M&IWO. TM/1104111 YO
1101/.01-0.IO'OY1a ML MKT LALOlD LR11i01
•
•
J
•
d 2.
•
iU
IN
'Wait- -
/-
\•
•
•
1
L.
r
4
%P1
tit£
O1.•£
n 1
1! 111,.1
.O 6 1I—
j .0•,1
V .514' LW E Lobo - 12S C.S!'
i fK- St h¢ru
7
i''
J • * t •1
N fto 114 j
r•�
ti. 331?
: .
i
vaa • ,
z <
A, �, .Q z
Y j
t Y"^ •—
, ,O a: x—
-.4
IL's a -Sk, ,11w
u.] �•
7y
-i.�b �i
A$ Ls:•
,;
‘r
rllt'Itno:fe h p i[St'fl'•mlc.n ddt Sa i ii urj RRSZUI(cr�d� p;I'