HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-052 Council ResolutionCouncil Member Reinert introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 52 - 91
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SUNRISE DRIVE
FROM FAIRMONT DRIVE TO ELM STREET
WHEREAS: pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on
May 28, 1991, the City Engineer has prepared plans
and specifications for the improvement of Sunrise
Drive from Fairmont Drive to Elm Street and has
presented such plans and specifications to the
Council for approval;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby
approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in
the official paper and the Construction Bulletin an
advertisement for bids upon the making of such
improvement under such approved plans and
specifications. The advertisement shall be published
for two days, shall specify the work to be done, shall
state that bids will be opened and bids will be received
by the City Clerk until 10:00 A.M. on Friday, June 21,
1991 at which time they will be publicly opened in the
council chambers of the city hall by the City Clerk and
Engineer, will be tabulated and will be considered by
the Council at 6:30 P.M. on Monday, June 24, 1991 in the
council chambers. Any bidder whose responsibility is
questioned during consideration of the bid will be given
the opportunity to address the Council on the issue of
PAGE 1
responsibility. No bids will be considered unless
sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a
cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified
check payable to the Clerk for five (5) per cent of the
amount of such bid.
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 28th day of May,
1991.
L4,p?'41/47
L. Bise
Har L. , or
7J
ily G. An erson, Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution wad
duly seconded by Council Member Bohjanen and upon vote
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Neal, Bisel, Reinert, Bohjanen.
The following voted against same:
None, Council Member Kuether was absent.
Where upon said resolution was declared duly passed and
adopted.
PAGE 2