HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-117 Council ResolutionCouncil member Bergeson
introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 96-117
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PROPOSED 1997 GENERAL OPERATING
BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF LINO LAKES.
WHEREAS, Pursuant to State Statute, the Lino Lakes City Council is required to adopt a resolution
setting out proposed General Fund revenues and expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the following General Fund operating budget be adopted on a
preliminary basis for 1997:
1997 PRELIMINARY GENERAL FUND BUDGET
REVENUES:
Property Taxes $2,733,015
Intergovernmental Revenue 795,875
Business Licenses and Permits 20,270
Non -Business Licenses and Permits 516,500
Charges for Services 24,900
Refunds and Reimbursements 53,000
Franchise Fees 60,500
Public Safety 63,550
_ Municipal Fines 95,000
Interest on Investments 60,000
Engineering/Planning Fees 80,000
Administrative Fees 118,000
Miscellaneous 30,500
TOTAL PROPOSED GENERAL FUND REVENUES $4,651,110
EXPENDITURES:
Mayor and Council 61,630
Elections 18,010
Administration 312,440
Cable TV 6,390
Finance 227,740
Legal Consultants 130,000
Community Development 237,510
Engineering 178,290
Planning and Zoning Board 9,500
Government Buildings 200,540
Charter Commission 5,000
Environmental Committee 2,500
Police 1,277,880
Fire 275,370
Building Inspections 143,710
Streets 571,230
Solid Waste Abatement 55,540
Page 2
Expenditures Continued
Fleet Management 185,210
Parks 349,730
Recreation 116,290
Park Board 7,580
Forestry 91,590
Salary Reserve 20,000
Others 50,000
Reserves 42,430
Street Reconstruction/HRA 75,000
TOTAL PROPOSED GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $4,651,110
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 9th day of Septem.-r, 1.96
ohn Landers, Mayor
Marilyn G,Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Lyden
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether, Lyden,
Landers
The following voted against same: Council Member Neal.
Where upon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted: