HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-118 Council ResolutionCouncil member Bergeson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 96-118
RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE PROPOSED 1996 TAX LEVY, COLLECTABLE IN 1997.
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes is in need of certain funds to pay expenditures for General Fund
operating costs anticipated in the year 1997, and
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes is in need of certain funds to pay expenses towards Certificate of
Indebtedness obligations, and
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes is in need of certain funds to pay expenses towards the Public Project
Revenue Bonds, and
WHEREAS, the City of Lino Lakes is not restricted by levy limitations imposed by the State of Minnesota.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Lino Lakes, Anoka County, Minnesota, hereby does
levy on a proposed basis the following upon taxable property in said City of Lino Lakes, to -wit:
1. Total amount levied in the year 1996 to be spread for taxes due and payable in the year
1997 (including HACA) is the total sum of $3,425,200
2. The total amount above levied is for the following purposes:
GENERAL OPERATING $3,103,248
General Bonded Debt
Public Project Revenue Bonds
Equipment Certificates of 1995
Equipment Certificates of 1996
Total General Obligation Bonded Debt
TOTAL LEVIES
118,112
97,944
105,896
$ 321,952
$3,425,200
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Lino Lakes City Council that the general fund operating budget and
special levies for Equipment Certificates and the Public Project Revenue Bonds as reviewed by the City
Council represents the basis for this levy. Individual department budgets are subject to preliminary approval
by the City Council and shall be authorized by separate action.
LET IT BE FURTHER RESOLVED that the total levy will be certified to the County of Anoka less the certified
amount of Homestead and Agriculture Credit Aid (HACA) for payable 1997.
Total Levy $3,425,200
Less Total HACA (421, 891)
Total Levy less HACA $3,003,309
Page 2
Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 9th day of Se• ember, 1996.
o n Landers, Mayor
i2 6 m
MarilynG. Anderson, Clerk -Treasurer
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bergeson, Kuether,
Landers.
The following voted against same: Lyden, Neal.
Where upon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted: