The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02/10/2016 P&Z PacketCITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING Wednesday, February 10, 2016 6:30 p.m. Council Chambers Please be courteous and turn off all electronic devices during the meeting. A CTF Nn A 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 14, 2015 and January 13, 2016 4. OPEN MIKE 5. ACTION ITEMS A. Saddle Club Second Addition Final Plat 6. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Industrial District Outdoor Storage Requirements B. Project Updates 7. ADJOURN Meeting guidelines on reverse side. City of Lino Lakes Planning & Zoning Board MEETING GUIDELINES Open Mike — The purpose of a Board Meeting is to accomplish the business of the city. When presenting at a meeting please remember to be respectful, and follow these guidelines: • Please address the meeting chair. • State your name and address for the record. • Please observe a 4-minute limit. • The topic must relate to city business. • Open Mike is for items not on the agenda. • A spokesperson must represent a group of five or more — groups will have 8 minutes. • The Presiding Officer may limit duplicative presentations. • Remember, the meeting is to discuss city business only. Public Hearing - Held as a separate item of business on the agenda. The public hearing segment is your opportunity to tell the Board how you feel about issues scheduled to be heard. Typically, a hearing follows these steps: • The Presiding Officer (Chair or Vice -Chair) will announce the proposal to be reviewed and ask for the staff report. The presiding Officer shall maintain strict order and etiquette at all meetings. • Staff will present their report on the proposal. • Board members will then ask City Staff questions about the proposal. • The Presiding Officer will then open up the public hearing for anyone present who wishes to comment on the proposal. This is the time for the public to make comments or ask questions about the proposal. Comments should be limited to four (4) minutes unless further time is granted by the Presiding Officer. All comments should be directed to the Board as a body and not to any individual Board Member or City Staff Member unless permission is granted by the Presiding Officer. No person shall be permitted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the Board without the permission of the Presiding Officer. • After everyone in the audience wishing to speak has given his/her comments, the Presiding Officer shall close the public hearing. • The Board will then discuss the proposal. No further public comments are allowed. • The Board will then make a recommendation(s) and/or a decision. When you are called upon for your comments, please step to the microphone at the podium and state your name and address for the record. Occasionally, the Board may continue a hearing to another meeting before taking action. Meeting Etiquette The Planning & Zoning Board must preserve order and decorum while the meeting is in session. A resident shall not, by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the proceedings or the business of the Board, nor disturb any resident or Board Member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Board. CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE : October 14, 2015 TIME STARTED : 6:30 P.M. TIME ENDED : 7:58 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT : Neil Evenson, Michael Hyden (Vice Chair), Matthew Kassner, Perry Laden, Lou Masonick, Michael Root MEMBERS ABSENT : Paul Tralle (Chair) STAFF PRESENT : Keith Dahl, Diane Hankee, Katie Larsen I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Vice Chair Hyden called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. on October 14, 2015. IL APROVAL OF AGENDA y The Agenda was approved as presented. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: September 9, 2015 Mr. Masonick made a MOTION to approve the September 9, 2015 Meeting Minutes. Motion was supported by Mr. Laden. Motion carried 5 - 0. (Hyden abstained.) IV. OPEN MIKE Mr. Hyden declared Open Mike at 6:35 p.m. There was no one present for Open Mike. Mr. Kassner made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:35 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 5 - 0. (Hyden abstained.) DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board October 14, 2015 Page 2 V. ACTION ITEMS A. 6602 Pheasant Run -Variance for Garage Construction Keith Dahl, Community Development Intern, presented the staff report. Staff recommends approval of a 10 foot variance to reduce the required setback from 40 feet to 30 feet to allow for the construction of an attached double garage, subject to the following conditions: 1. The detached shed in the northeast corner of the lot, found in violation of city ordinances, shall be relocated onto the applicant's property. 2. The accessory structure shall meet the requirements of § 1007.043 General Building and Use Provisions. 3. The accessory structure shall meet all other city code and state building code requirements. 4. A building permit shall be submitted for by the applicant and approved by the City of Lino Lakes prior to construction. Mr. Masonick questioned whose property the other half of the shed is located on. City staff was unaware of whose property it is, but the shed needs to be moved onto the applicant's property regardless of who owns it. Mr. Root asked if the garage construction would impact the trees. Mr. Dahl provided more information on the property features. Mr. Root will ask the applicant to address this later. Mr. Laden asked for more information on the nearby areas that have a 30 foot setback and the history of when setbacks were changed from 30 to 40 feet. Mr. Dahl responded that properties to the west of the applicant's property were those that had a 30 foot setback (about a half mile to a mile away) and properties to the east of the property were those that met the 40 foot setback. City staff is unsure when the setback was changed, though Katie Larsen, City Planner, mentioned that even in the building plans from when the home was built in the 1980's it was noted that there was a 40 foot setback. Mr. Masonick questioned if the requirement to have a garage existed when the house was built and when that requirement came into effect. Mr. Dahl replied that there was no requirement at that time to have a garage. Ms. Larsen indicated that the requirement could have been introduced around 1997. Mr. Evenson asked for clarification on the garage requirement and city staff presented further details on the requirement. Mr. Evenson speculated if the builder did not construct a garage on the property because they were unable to meet the setback requirement. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board October 14, 2015 Page 3 Mr. Laden asked if city staff or the applicant explored building a garage within the setback but configured in different direction or area of the property. Mr. Dahl explained that they looked into other options but the applicant has a deck that would be in the way. Mr. Hyden asked for details on the maximum amount of accessory structures that can be constructed on a given lot and the requirement for the applicant's property. Mr. Dahl stated that he did the calculations on this property and the applicant would still be well within the requirements once the garage is constructed. Mr. Hyden invited the applicant to the podium. Dylan Lindman, 6602 Pheasant Run, started out by discussing the setbacks at nearby properties. He noted that his new fence would hinder the public from noticing that his property does not meet the setback and he ensured that he is not going to trim the pine trees. Mr. Lindman summarized his reasoning for wanting the additional space in his garage. Mr. Laden asked Mr. Lindman if he is willing to accept the 30 foot setback, which he responded that he is not, as it would not be functional. Mr. Kassner questioned why the applicant chose a 24 foot garage since the national average is 20-22 feet. Mr. Lindman discussed the reasoning, which is mainly due to measurements of building supplies. Mr. Laden encouraged the applicant to explore side loading the garage, which would allow him to have his 24 foot garage. V i Mr. Root expressed his support for the variance. Mr. Kassner discussed his support for the 30 foot setback recommended by city staff. Mr. Lindman asked how his property could be impacted by expansion on Birch Street. Ms. Larsen answered that it would be considered a legal nonconforming structure. Mr. Root made a MOTION to recommend approval of a 10 foot variance, as recommended by City staff. Motion was supported by Mr. Laden. Motion carried 5 - 0. (Hyden abstained.) B. PUD Concept Plan Review North Oaks Company, LLC Ms. Larsen presented the staff report. Staff recommends submission of a revised concept plan by the developer with consideration of the comments provided by staff report, Council and Advisory Boards. Prompted by Mr. Masonick, Ms. Larsen discussed the wetlands and floodplain in further detail. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board October 14, 2015 Page 4 Mr. Evenson commented that it is difficult to imagine another 140 units in the development. Ms. Larsen indicated ways the developers could incorporate the additional units into the plan. Mr. Root observed that because the area is already busy, this is an area where you would want to put a high density development and he appreciated the comments about adding trails since so much traffic already exists in the area. Mr. Hyden has concerns about both intersections since there is so much traffic in the area. Diane Hankee, City Engineer, pointed out that there will be a traffic study done. Mr. Kassner seconded that he is concerned about adding the minimum amount of rooftops. Mr. Laden could not support this development without a commercial component. He wants to ensure that those who are residing in these rooftops would be able to patronize local businesses. Brought about by Mr. Masonick, Ms. Larsen and the board discussed city boundaries and commercial potential in the area. Gary Eagles, Vice President of Development with North Oaks Company, approached the podium to address concerns risen by the board. Mr. Eagles agrees with traffic concerns, which is why they do not want to add much more traffic and they chose their access points with this in mind. He discussed that developers did look at adding mixed use for commercial and he understands the board's desire to set aside space for commercial use, however the studies they have done have not proved that it would be a viable corner for commercial businesses. They would be willing to set aside some space for mixed use if the board would like, but their marketing studies have found that the outlook would not be positive. Mr. Eagles addressed further concerns with traffic, specifically at Ash Street. He then addresses concerns about the density. In North Oaks they worked with VLAWMO and the DNR in the Wilkinson Lake area. Their idea of shoreland ordinance was to tier the lower density towards the lake and higher density away from the lake, which is opposite of what the City of Lino Lakes is looking for in this development. Mr. Eagles agreed that he doesn't see how they can add 140 units on this site unless they add more apartments, though this would lead to more senior housing available than what would be needed. Mr. Hyden asked if Mr. Eagles could explain why their market studies showed that the area was not viable for commercial properties. Mr. Eagles explained that it is not an area for high population not only due to a small amount of rooftops, but also due to the large expanses of wetland to the north and to the west as well as difficulties in the east from an access standpoint. Mr. Eagles can share their market studies with the City if requested. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board October 14, 2015 Page 5 Mr. Eagles ensured that they would have included commercial space in the development if they thought it would be viable. Mr. Laden commented on market studies saying that 5 years ago market studies would have indicated that none of this development should be built. Mr. Eagles explained that they have been doing market studies in the area for the last 15 years and it is evident from the amount of properties still waiting to be sold in the strip mall in White Bear Township and the nearby properties in Lino Lakes that the area is not a successful commercial district. Mr. Hyden pointed out that you can only exit off the freeway in one direction. Mr. Eagles noted that they discussed the ramp issue with MnDOT and explained the barriers that would restrict them from creating another off ramp. City staff specified that they are just looking for input at this time from the board. Mr. Evenson stated that he is not opposed to the absence of commercial property in this development given the amount of available properties in the vicinity for the last 15 years. He added that if it had been a booming area it would have been established by now. Mr. Kassner provided his input saying that he would like to see commercial property included in the development if they are unable to incorporate the 140 additional units. He also mentioned that since the last market study was done 5 years ago, he would like to see this revisited since the market has changed vastly in the last 5 years. Mr. Kassner is confident that retail properties such as Starbucks would do well next to the freeway to catch people on their way to work. ILi No further action is required at this time. C. PUBLIC HEARING to consider Amendment to Chapter 1103: Floodplain Management Ms. Larsen introduced Katy Thompson of WSB & Associates, Inc. Ms. Thompson presented the staff report. Staff recommends approval of proposed Ordinance No. 10-15. Mr. Laden asked where we have floodways in the city. Ms. Thompson responded that the City of Lino Lakes currently does not have any floodways. It is required to adopt all three districts in case the city decides to pursue detailed studies in the future. Mr. Laden asked about Rice Creek and Ms. Thompson explained that Rice Creek is just a floodplain and if a developer decided to develop in that area they would need to be able to determine if it was in a floodway or floodplain and what they would be allowed to do on their property. Mr. Hyden wanted to clarify that you can't build on the floodway, but you can build on the fringe. Ms. Thompson confirmed that this is correct and noted that the houses just need to be elevated. She discussed that everything in Lino Lakes is a general floodplain, which means it is the developer's responsibility to determine whether or not they fall into the floodway or floodplain. DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board October 14, 2015 Page 6 Ms. Larsen noted that in the Saddle Club and NorthPointe projects the applicants had to go through this same process since there was a floodplain on those properties. She also stated that in the city there are not a lot of properties where structures are built on the flood fringe. Mr. Hyden asked how he would go about finding out if he is on a floodplain. Ms. Larsen responded that staff can easily look up that information through the GIS system. Mr. Masonick asked if you can put a temporary structure on a floodplain. Ms. Thompson replied that it is okay as long as the structure is highway ready and has current registration. Mr. Evenson asked for clarification from city staff on how the insurance process works for those who need flood insurance. Ms. Thompson explained the process and Ms. Hankee gave an estimate for the costs associated with the process. Mr. Laden asked city staff to explain what the GIS system is, since he hears that term being used a lot. Ms. Larsen described the ARC GIS system and noted that the public does not have access to the system. Ms. Larsen ensured that it is paid for by city staff, not the public. Ms. Thompson and Ms. Larsen explained that the floodplain information will be available to the public on the FEMA website. Mr. Hyden declared the Public Hearing open at 7:51 p.m. There was no one present for the Public Hearing. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to close the Public Hearing at 7:52 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Masonick. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to recommend approval of the proposed ordinance. Motion was supported by Mr. Kassner. Motion carried 5 - 0. (Hyden abstained.) VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Proiect Updates Ms. Larsen provided an update of current city projects. Ms. Hankee gave an update on the Shenandoah, West Oaks, NorthPointe and Saddle Club projects. Ms. Larsen announced that the November Planning & Zoning Board meeting has been moved to Wednesday, November 18th, as our offices are closed on Wednesday, November I Ith in observance of Veterans Day. VII. ADJOURNMENT DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board October 14, 2015 Page 7 Mr. Laden made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 7:58 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 5 - 0. (Hyden abstained.) Respectfully submitted, Nicole DeDeyn Community Development Administrative Assistant DRAFT MINUTES CITY OF LINO LAKES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES DATE : January 13, 2016 TIME STARTED : 6:32 P.M. TIME ENDED : 7:21 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT : Neil Evenson, Perry Laden, Michael Root, Paul Tralle (Chair) MEMBERS ABSENT : Matt Kassner, Lou Masonick STAFF PRESENT : Michael Grochala, Katie Larsen I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: Chair Tralle called the Lino Lakes Planning and Zoning Board meeting to order at 6:32 p.m. on January 13, 2016. IL APROVAL OF AGENDA Chair Tralle added election of Temporary Vice Chair to the action items in the agenda. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 14, 2015 Approval of the October 14, 2015 Meeting Minutes was postponed until more board members are present to vote. IV. OPEN MIKE Chair Tralle declared Open Mike at 6:34 p.m. Encouraged by the board, Centennial High School students Trevor Kirby, Tyler Graupner, and Curtis Nelson introduced themselves. The students were attending the Planning and Zoning Board meeting for a government observation project. Mr. Laden made a MOTION to close Open Mike at 6:36 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 3 - 0. (Tralle abstained.) DRAFT MINUTES Planning & Zoning Board January 13, 2016 Page 2 V. ACTION ITEMS A. Election of Temporary Vice Chair Mr. Laden made a MOTION to recommend Michael Root for the Temporary Vice Chair role. Motion was supported by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 3 - 0. (Root abstained.) Michael Root will serve as the Temporary Vice Chair until a permanent Vice Chair has been appointed. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Metropolitan Council 2015 System Statement Katie Larsen, City Planner, presented the staff report. More updates will be coming in the fall. The board and city staff further discussed employment projections, affordable housing needs, transportation improvements, and population forecasts. B. Proiect Updates I i Michael Grochala, Community Development Director, provided an update of current city projects. VII. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Laden made a MOTION to adjourn the meeting at 7:21 p.m. Motion was supported by Mr. Evenson. Motion carried 3 - 0. (Tralle abstained.) Respectfully submitted, Nicole DeDeyn Community Development Administrative Assistant DRAFT MINUTES PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 5A STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE REQUEST: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REVIEW DEADLINE: Katie Larsen, City Planner February 10, 2016 Saddle Club Second Addition Final Plat FP2016-001 Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. Attn: Marcel Eibensteiner 1000 County Road E West Shoreview, MN 55126 Complete Application Date: January 8, 2016 60 Day Review: March 8, 2016 Environmental Board: NA Park Board: NA Planning & Zoning Board: February 10, 2016 Council Work Session: March 7, 2016 City Council Meeting: March 14, 2016 BACKGROUND Saddle Club is a PUD residential subdivision located south of Birch Street and Old Birch Street. The preliminary plat is 39.4 gross acres and consists of 55 single family residential lots. The applicant has submitted a land use application for final plat of Saddle Club Second Addition. This review is based on the final plat dated December 17, 2015 and prepared by EG Rud & Sons. Previous Council Actions: • February 10, 2014: Saddle Club PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat, Resolution No. 14-15 1 • August 25, 2014: Saddle Club PUD Final Plan -Final Plat, Resolution No. 14-63 ANALYSIS Subdivision Ordinance Conformity with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code The final plat has been reviewed for compliance with the comprehensive plan, zoning and subdivision ordinance. The proposed development is not considered premature and meets the performance standards of the subdivision and zoning ordinance. The final plat is consistent with the PUD Development Stage Plan/Preliminary Plat and Final Plan. The phasing plan has been revised from 2 phases to 3 phases of development. The total number of lots has not changed. ORIGINAL PHASING PLAN # of LOTS Phase One 28 Phase Two 27 TOTAL 55 REVISED PHASING PLAN # of LOTS Phase One 28 Phase Two 17 Phase Three 10 TOTAL 5 An important component of the Saddle Club development was the connection of Fox Road and extension of public utilities to the Foxborough development. This extension was to be completed with phase two of the development. The revised phasing plan now has this connection being made with phase three. The city will obtain financial securities from the developer to assure future construction of these improvements. These securities will be detailed and paid with the Development Agreement for Saddle Club Second Addition. Blocks and Lots The final plat for Saddle Club Second Addition creates 17 lots from outlots B and C, Saddle Club First Addition. W Streets Black Berry Court will be constructed with this phase. As approved with the final plan, the right-of-way width is 50 feet and street width is 30 feet back to back. Public Utilities Watermain and sanitary sewer will be extended down Black Berry Court per the approved construction plans. Easements Standard drainage and utility easements are provided on all lot lines. Public Land Dedication and Fees The City is requiring cash in lieu of land dedication. Saddle Club Second Addition 17 lots x $2,500 $42,500 Trail The trail will be constructed from the Foxborough development to Black Berry Court in this phase. Zoning Saddle Club Second Addition is zoned PUD-Planned Unit Development as approved by the City Council with Ordinance No. 01-14. Comprehensive Plan The final plat is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan in terms of the Resource Management System, Land Use Plan and Housing Plan. Transportation Plan By-pass Lane on Birch Street The City is working with Anoka County on the design and construction of a by-pass lane on Birch Street. Design is 70% complete and the County anticipates construction by fall 2016. Old Birch Street Design on the north -south section and cul de sac on the north end of Old Birch Street is 50% complete. The City anticipates construction by fall 2016. The east -west section of Old Birch Street will be reconstructed by the developer by fall 2016. Future Fox Road and Public Utilities Connection The City is drafting a purchase agreement with Comcast to acquire the south 550 feet of their parcel to allow for the extension of Fox Road and public utilities to Foxborough. The city will obtain financial securities from the developer to assure construction of these improvements with phase three. A wetland delineation has been completed on this area and the developer is starting design of the Fox Road and public utility extension. Construction will coincide with the submittal of the Saddle Club Third Addition in spring 2017. Floodplain The developer received a FEMA LOMR (Letter of Map Revision) on December 7, 2015 effectively removing floodplain from 10 lots in Saddle Club First Addition. It should be noted the floodplain has been removed from the required buildable house pad areas; however, floodplain still exists along the rear of the lots. Future lenders may require Letter of Map Amendments (LOMA) on these lots. It should be noted the floodplain crosses just the north rear corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Saddle Club Second Addition but is within the drainage and utility easement and outside the buildable pad. It does not appear this area was included in the original LOMR and future lenders may require a Letter of Map Amendments (LOMA) on this lot as well. Development Agreement A Development Agreement shall be drafted by the City, executed by the City and the developer and recorded by the developer. Title Commitment The City Attorney reviewed the title commitment and final plat and notes Royal Oaks shall transfer title to Dupont Holdings before the plat can be approved and recorded. The title commitment legal description shall be revised to include Outlot B and C. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement A Maintenance Agreement for Stormwater Management Facilities was approved by the 2 City Council on August 11, 2014 with Resolution No. 14-87 for the entire NorthPointe development. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Saddle Club Second Addition final plat subject to the following conditions: 1. All comments from City Engineer letter dated February 1, 2016 shall be addressed. 2. A Development Agreement shall be drafted by the City, executed by the City and the developer and recorded by the developer. 3. Black Berry Court shall be revised to one word, Blackberry Court. 4. Title Commitment: a. Royal Oaks shall transfer title to Dupont Holdings before the plat is approved and recorded. b. The title commitment legal description shall be revised to include Outlot B and C. ATTACHMENTS 1. Site Location Map 2. City Engineer letter dated February 1, 2016 3. Final Plat, Saddle Club Second Addition 4. Original Phasing Plan 5. Revised Phasing Plan 5 ■ WSB & Assoc engineering • planning • environmental • construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 Memorandum To: Katie Larsen, City Planner From: Diane Hankee PE, City Engineer Date: February 1, 2016 Re: Saddle Club 2nd Addition Plan Review WSB Project No. 2029-633 We have reviewed the Final Plat for Saddle Club 2nd Addition in Lino Lakes, MN prepared by E.G. Rudd and Sons, Inc. dated December 17, 2015. Note the construction plans were previously reviewed with the Saddle Club 15t Addition. Based on our review, we offer the following comments that should be responded to in writing by the applicant: GRADING, EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 1. The applicant is to verify that the NPDES permit and SWPPP are current. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 1. The stormwater management was previously reviewed with the 1st Addition and a Stormwater Management Agreement is in place for the overall plat. There are no additional comments at this time. FLOODPLAIN 1. A LOMR was completed based on the meets and bounds and there remains floodplain on some of the lots. The developer should consider a LOMA for those lots. WETLANDS For the future extension of Fox Road (south section as a separate plat), an approved RCWD wetland mitigation plan will need to be approved. St. Cloud • Minneapolis • St. Paul Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com SACommunity DevelopmentTrojects\Planning Cases\Saddle Club\Second Addition\Staff Reports\20160210 PZ-Final Plat\2 Engineering Review Saddle Club 2nd.docx Ms. Katie Larsen February 1, 2016 Page 2 WATER SYSTEM The proposed water system extension was previously reviewed with the lst Addition. There are no additional comments at this time. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM 1. The proposed sanitary sewer system extension was previously reviewed with the I" Addition. There are no additional comments at this time. TRANSPORTATION The trail should be constructed from the Fox Borough development, and signage installed per plan. A detail of the trail section adjacent to wetlands is to be submitted. 2. A temporary cul-du-sac or turnaround is to be constructed at the end of Fox Road in the 1st Addition. 3. The developer is responsible for milling and overlaying the east -west section of Old Birch Street. The south edge will need to be a full depth patch where it has broken up from construction. The inside curve at the match point of Old Birch and Pheasant Run needs to be brought up to a higher grade. 4. The Old Birch Street access (north-east) at Birch Street is to be removed and a cul-du-sac constructed. 5. A by-pass lane on Birch Street at the intersection with Old Birch (south-west ) is to be constructed. The City has been working with Anoka County on the design of the by-pass lane. Anoka County plans construct the by-pass lane with their 2016 Roadway Project. This work includes the reconstruction of a section of trail adjacent to the by-pass lane. Anoka County has also expressed and interest in re -locating the driveway access at 855 Birch Street. Anoka County would lead the effort to re -locate the driveway access. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT A Development Agreement is being drafted for Saddle Club 2nd Addition. The cost estimates for the oversizing and other development costs have been updated. 2. The developer shall provide security for grading work associated with Fox Road. 3. The proposed Saddle Club 2nd Addition has been modified from the preliminary plat. The current proposed 2nd Addition includes Black Berry Court and does not include Fox Road. The Fox Road connection is needed with a future phase to: a. Complete the transportation network in the area. b. Provide watermain looping that is needed to maintain water service pressure and fire fighting capacity. S:\CommwityDevelopmmt\Projeas\Plnning Cases\Saddle Club\Second Addition\StaffReports\20160210 PZ-Final Plat\2 Engineering Review Saddle Club 2n Ms. Katie Larsen February 1, 2016 Page 3 PERMITS 1. Permits were obtained with the overall Saddle Club development, 15t Addition. 2. The Fox Road connection at the south end (future plat) will require RCWD permitting for wetland mitigation. If you or the applicant has any questions regarding these comments, please contact Diane Hankee at (651) 982-2430 or diane.hankee@ci.lino-lakes.mn.us. S:\CommwityDevelopmmt\Projeas\Plnning Cases\Saddle Club\Second Addition\StaffReports\20160210 PZ-Final Plat\2 Engineering Review Saddle Club 2n L0 O � N O Qi y Q Q � W 0 W Ca W SADDLE CLUB SECOND ADDITION KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Dupont Holdings, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described property. Outlot B and Outlot C, SADDLE CLUB FIRST ADDITION, Anoka County, Minnesota Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as SADDLE CLUB SECOND ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public ways and the drainage and utility easements as shown by this plat. In witness whereof said Dupont Holdings, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this ______ day of --------- 20___. Dupont Holdings, LLC President and Chief Manager Marcel Eibensteiner STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of _____________- 20___ by Marcel Eibensteiner, President and Chief Manager of Dupont Holdings, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company. Notary Public, My Commission Expires County, Minnesota I Daniel W. Obermiller do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey, that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this _____ day of __________ , 20____ . Daniel W. Obermiller, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 25341 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF (NOT TO SCALE) DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: 15 51 I I 0 0 BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT LINES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. This instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of ____--------- 20___ by Daniel W. Obermiller. Notary Public, County, Minnesota O DENOTES Y2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON PIPE My Commission Expires MARKED BY RLS NO. 25341. • DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT City Council, City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT THE SOUTH This plat of SADDLE CLUB SECOND ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota at LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE a regular meeting thereof held this _______ day of ------------- 20___, and said plat is in compliance with the provisions SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 22, IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF SOUTH 89 DEGREES 50 City Council, City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST. — — DENOTES EDGE OF WET LAND. By Mayor DENOTES WET LAND. By Clerk County Surveyor I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this ______ day of --------- 20___ . Larry D. Hoium Anoka County Surveyor County Auditor/Treasurer Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 20_ on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this day of . 20_ . Property Tax Administrator By Deputy County Recorder/Registrar of Titles County of Anoka, State of Minnesota I hereby certify that this plat of SADDLE CLUB SECOND ADDITION was filed in the office of the County Recorder/Registrar of Titles for public record on this day of 20_ at o'clock M. and was duly recorded in Book Page . as Document No. ------ County Recorder/Registrar of Titles By Deputy GRAPHIC SCALE 60 0 30 60 120 A: I NPI 'I P I Awq 1.2/17/2015 9:57:57 AvI CS ( SCALE IN FEET ) I inch = 60 feet 240 4,45��E 0 2140 0 . 0 57 2/ 0 12,600 sq, f t, l'o co O �jq q5 / / i; p / C v1 �\� 1 0 00/ 5 .741 S59,29 W V W \ ,>z2g 74 22 E �\ C) tn s o 12,654 sq, f t, �o Np o PGE lull, ,w F ENS � o �• � W / X 03 ` 0�\L 00 I s 14,608 sq� Cis 8 I Ul o�•o n, �c9 N38o45' �/� _ �L �D„ ` 1 0 A °' S89057'11"E 2 59'1E: �4 �000 , N 4689oo f; 0 ==44° � 6, A6016�00 \\. } 200.00 S89050 '40"E �'-SOUTH LINE OF SE1 /4-SW1 /4 SECTION 28, TWP. 31, RGE 22 WITNESS CORNER, - OF SECTION 28, TWP. 31, RGE. 22. /110q 5S,,Hr / L 1 J S72 3 - - L _ J L - J I \ \O \ 7 C>a � x (J TDYAyNq GE Fq SEMEN T S89'50'40"E 281.03 310.92 S89'50'40"E City of Lino lakes County of Anoka Sec. 28, T31, B22 NORTH V) N V) 0 a � O � O T � 000 3OC) �o 0 00 0 U C L 1 J y-+ ( N U �/ E°0 N U L O N I LLI a m I 1 I }} � I 1 J \ / A A00 co 0 � N � N � W V� O \�7, Lo o w a>- Q oOCT LLI N zz J 0 C0 0 w cavil �1 I,I L 1 J L 1 _ L I J L 1 J L 1 L 1 _ LSOUTHEAST CORNER OF SE1/4—SW1/4 SECTION 28, TWP. 31, RGE 22 (SOUTH QUARTER CORNER) I �197 Professional Land Surveyors �o r _ � � I PNI �SPN�S P SUMK PHASE ONE PHASE TWO TOTAL H I0�=I I I 0 V� DRAWN BY: DESIGN BY: C.M. C.W.P. CHCKD BY: PROJ. NO. C.W.P. 13-1414 ORIGINAL DATE: MAY 21, 2014 z O d U w 0 z _O U) W J m D U) Q J d J Q z E) L 0 �ALO m � Fc .o w O 'U O caa)�� .0 �U) � U O y O mE�_� c �- U O J a) m W L O O 0 mi e, W r 0 a COD U) z Q J 5- J Q z rl- N N co O z w U O J J cn w U*) J O < N Q � = N U co 0 PREPARED FOR: DUPONT HOLDINGS, LLC SITE PLANNING & ENGINEERING PLOWE 6776 LAKE DRIVE SUITE 110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 PHONE: (651) 361-8210 FAX: (651) 361-8701 — NORTH 0 40 80 L ► / / i 1 INCH = 80 FEET C 2 Know what's below. Call before you dig. PHASING PLAN SADDLE CLUB P.U.D. 00 1�� ID pSim mmmmm_m-mimmmmmim`0--WiWjWiWiW= `\MOLD BIRCH ST I I I I P N P SS WER ON�yI ISPN�S PRV SUMMARY PHASE ONE 28 LOTS PHASE TWO 17 LOTS PHASE THREE 10 LOTS TOTAL 55 LOTS H �H I 01= I O�U I m I � I I / ffffffff�� i�i OLD BIRCH ST M I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -� 7 ------------�L-F-r I I I BLOCK I 4 5 6 I � I ----------� �I 8 1 I I I DRAWN BY: C.M. DESIGN BY: C.W.P. CHCKD BY: C.W.P. PROJ. NO. 13-1414 ORIGINAL DATE: MAY 21, 2014 z � O Qz W 00 U Q �w w Cn Cn Cn Cn w z z Q¢Q_ O J r d J Cn J � J � W z = z = iY LL d LL d U� U,r r I— 0p 6 N N CV N N Ln CD c i T N N C2 O z w (j O J J >d U) W Ln J — ry O Q N = N U N N r z J IL z U) Q _ IL PREPARED FOR: DUPONT HOLDINGS, LLC SITE PLANNING & ENGINEERING PLOWE 6776 LAKE DRIVE SUITE 110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 PHONE: (651) 361-8210 FAX: (651) 361-8701 -1 r - - - - ---------1 —— I------------------- I -- ------_-____-__ --------- FNOPo.,.TN]H -- NORTH AN[) 0., FEET EAST OR I , / r ---- --- _ �_LOT CIXtNER / / 0 40 80 I I / 1 INCH = 80 FEET C 2 Know what's below. Call before you dig. PHASING PLAN SADDLE CLUB P.U.D. STAFF ORIGINATOR: P & Z MEETING DATE: REQUEST: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANTS: OWNERS: BACKGROUND PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA ITEM 6A Michael Grochala February 10, 2016 Industrial District Outdoor Storage Requirements None. Discussion Topic Only City of Lino Lakes City of Lino Lakes Staff has been contacted regarding construction of a large industrial warehousing/distribution facility along 35E. The facility would be approximately 460,000 square feet. The property is zoned L-I, Light Industrial. Warehouse and distribution facilities are a permitted use in this district. However, the business will have exterior parking areas for semi -trailers. Currently, the zoning ordinance considers trailers as exterior storage. Open and Outdoor storage is allowed as Conditional Use in the L-I District. The current requirements are as follows: Section 1007.120 (9): (e) Open and outdoor storage (not outdoor sales lots) as an accessory use provided that: 1. The designated storage area shall comply with all building setback requirements for the district. Outside storage is prohibited between the principal structure and any public right-of-way. 2. The storage area is landscaped and screened from view of adjacent uses and public rights -of -way via a fence and greenbelt planting strip, in accordance with §1007.043 (17)(f) of this Ordinance. 3. The entire storage area is fenced and secured in an appropriate manner. 4. The storage area is blacktopped or concrete surfaced, unless an alternative wear -resistant material is determined by the City Engineer to be suitable to control dust and drainage and is specifically approved by the City Council. 1 5. The storage area does not take up parking space or loading space as required for conformity to this Ordinance and is not located in the front yard. 6. The property shall not abut I-35W or I-35E. 7. The ratio of storage area to building footprint shall not exceed 2.5:1. 8. All parking, loading and truck staging activities shall occur on site. On -street parking and loading associated with the use is prohibited. 9. Storage shall not include material considered hazardous under Federal or State Environmental Law. As noted exterior storage is not allowed on property abutting 35E or 35W. Staff would like to discuss possible consideration of an amendment that would allow for trailer storage in these areas. Possible considerations may be to allow trailer storage as an accessory use. The City could limit the location and number of trailers. Berming and landscaping would be a requirement as well. Based on your comments staff may consider drafting a proposed ordinance amendment. ATTACHMENTS 1. Distribution Facility Concept Plan 2 I N T E R S T A T E ------ ------------------------ // I 5m 0 5 Lu EXISnNG r- BILLBOARD _- - - - - - - - 70 TRAILERS ELIMINATE ACCESS F TO BILLBOARD I G •// I 1 " 58 DOCKS W L L LJLJLJ LJLJLJ JLJLJLJ J LJLJL LJLJL LJ J JLJ LJ JLJLJLJ JLJ LJ JLJLJLJ JLJ J L LJ LJLJL LJL ED 8 3 5 E -- - - ---- -� --- ___ �___ ____ _ -? \ IAD\ — — \ \ \\ I IjADII I \ \ \ 111 \ { III I I \I \ I I I I Li LJLJLJLJ J L— `O+ --- --- 0 Ir 7 60 SPE A - T - - - - T oo IL \ B ILO G �CvtiCK r -T F F OH \ IL --- --- j, 04 KING I I I I I I I I I I ROPOS9,8f�0 S FIL,ING� I I I 5AY52T - - - - F F7 -T T T- SPEE BAY - - - - - - I I I I I i"' Dil ao I ' �r�r�r�r-II �-rr a� �1r�rrr�rhri rrrlr�r�r�nY�r� r�r�nrrr.r.Frr� r�rtrr�rrrrrlrrr ---� I r rv�r� v�r� r-Ir�r 60 PARKING STALLS 32 TRAILERS \ P I \ \ I I OPTI.NAIi--- DOCKS It I I -T T 17 \ I I y \ \ \I I _ I I 0 I I 32 TRAILERS - ----I--tl--tr--------H-----+1-+----1-4--I-I--I-�---4------1-I----- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - -------- ---- --- — _ — — _ — — — _ — — _ — — _ _ — --- -- — — — _ _ __ _ _ __ - - __ _ — _ — — — — — —. — _ — — — — — _ _ _ __ _ _ _ J _ — — _ a w 0 1 2 1 S t A V E N U E S O U T H EXTEND EXISTING, a 21st AVE SOUTH 1 SITE PLAN = C_ U Y Z q1 SCALE: 1 = 60'-0" Z \_ a ~ U W U) z F J X U W U an zo.N r _ _____- F I.--- y ___ 4 \I o L54 ,I r I --- __ I LJ_1_LJ 1za I- , - _ _ — — _I—,— — — — — — — — — — — — —J _ SITE DATA LOT AREA - t1,770,229 S.F. = 40.6 ACRES ZONING - L7, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING - 459.800 S.F. DISTRIBUTION PARKING DATA 459,800 S.F. AT 1/2000 = 230 STALLS REQUIRED 338 STALLS DEMONSTRATED I � LU 1 Iw I< ILU V I L A M P E R T A R C H I T E C T S 420 Summit Avenue St. Paul, MN 55102 M PM1anv:]Z.]55.1211 Fax:]fi5.>5].IBL9 IvmpartBlvmpart—vreM1.evm ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY r TIFY NAT THIS PLAN. SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERNSION AND TRAT I AM DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT N LAWS v\M,% TA. CIJ LE`��A�I \PE T��X4 1 66 v /`Ia"- IUNITEO �� j��_ PROPERTIES 3600 American BWd. W. Suit. 750 Bloomington, MN 55431 952-835-5300 W LU W c y Q U Z LU W U i Qt� LU Q W J J m U C,yrigFl 2015 I--- Lampert ArtM1llocle. P.A. Project Designer: JAMES 8 Drawn By. JRB Checked By. LL Revisions 11/2/15 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN Sheet Number A 1 Project No. 151007-1 C� • e . y� n ��,. ?:y1 -- `► :.. _ �_� ray "�f,• I JA it lk es -. awaroff'o, Ila 77 - .r— MEN 11 € • MINE- M