HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-105 Council ResolutionCITY OF LINO LAKES
RESOLUTION NO. 15-105
RESOLUTION CALLING HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
2015 WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the council on September 28, 2015, the city clerk was
directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of the 2015 Weed Abatements; and
WHEREAS, the clerk has notified the council that such proposed assessment has been
completed and filed in her office for public inspection; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes,
Minnesota that:
1. A hearing shall be held at 6:30 p.m. on October 26, 2015 in the city hall located at 600 Town
Center Parkway to pass upon such proposed assessment. All persons owning property affected by
such Weed Abatement charges will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such
assessment.
2. The city clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment
to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and she
shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. She shall also cause mailed notice to be
given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to
the hearing.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest
accrued to the date of payment, to the City, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire
assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. An owner may at any
time thereafter, pay to the City the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must
be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding
year.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 28th day of September, 2015.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
Kusterman and was duly seconded by Council Member Roeser and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof
Kusterman, Roeser, Rafferty, Stoes , Rein
The following voted against same:
none
ATTEST:
Julianne Bartell, City Clerk
Jeff Rein: , 1' ayor