Laserfiche WebLink
City made it an express condition in the CUP that it be connected to <br />municipal sewer and water before occupation and use. (Ex. 2, p. 4 <br />[Condition No. 9]) <br />g. Since it is not connected to City water and sanitary sewer services, it <br />is in conflict with the requirements of the MUSA district, as outlined by <br />the Comprehensive Plan and the use should not be allowed to continue <br />due to this conflict. It is not adequately served by essential public <br />facilities at this time, which merits denial of the amendment request. <br />h. The School District argues that language in the City Engineer's <br />Memorandum, dated March 19, 2020 (Ex. 14) compared with the <br />Engineer Memorandum, dated May 30, 2018 (Ex. 7) and incorporated <br />into the CUP conditions, indicates that the City does not, in fact, require <br />connection to sewer and water. The City finds the School District's <br />argument unavailing. At the time of the original CUP application, based <br />upon rezoning, redevelopment, and the Comprehensive Plan, the City <br />determined that the Property needed to be connected to water and sewer. <br />The School District now wants to unwind a primary condition of that <br />approval. The School District ignores that the March 19, 2020 <br />Memorandum expressly calls out this issue. For example, it states, "The <br />proposed site is guided in the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan for public <br />sanitary sewer that would discharge to the MCES Cottage Grove Ravine <br />Interceptor. Therefore, provisions for connecting to the municipal <br />sanitary sewer service should be included with the application. Instead, <br />the application makes a request for continued use existing and proposed <br />on -site septic systems and drainfrelds until sanitary sewer is available to <br />the site." The City Engineer's March 19, 2020 memorandum merely <br />represents the City Engineer's attempt to address an application which is <br />contrary to the previous approval and conditions. <br />i. Furthermore, the School District's application is premised on their <br />continued interim use of the Property (which has occurred since October <br />2019) until August 30, 2020 with its unpermitted temporary septic tank. <br />For the reasons stated previously, the temporary septic tank is not <br />adequate because it doesn't comply with Washington County regulations <br />or the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br />Application of City Code § 10.99 <br />Violating Conditions of Approval - § 10.99(A)(1)(b) <br />B. City Code § I 0.99(A)(1)(b) prohibits violating, failing to comply with, <br />authorizing, or permitting the violation of the terms and conditions of a city <br />- - approval, including permits and license. The City finds that the School -District is <br />using the Property in violation of the terms of its CUP as follows: <br />17 <br />