Laserfiche WebLink
Variance from Minimum Structure Setback from OHWL: With respect to the <br />proposed variance for a setback from the OHWL, strict enforcement of the City's zoning <br />regulations will cause practical difficulties and the applicant is proposing to use the <br />property in a reasonable manner. The property was platted and established prior to <br />current development standards which has resulted in a short depth but very wide lot. <br />Applying the 100 ft. setback along with the 30 ft. setback, from the ROW does make it very <br />difficult for the property to have any buildable area that would not conflict with a <br />provision of the City Code. The sport court will be able to meet the front yard setback <br />requirement of 30 ft. and sit behind the home. Though, it will not be possible for the <br />structure to be constructed on the property without needing a variance from the OWHL. <br />However, the previous variance for the home has established the idea that a reduction in <br />the setback from the OHWL is reasonable. Furthermore, with the City Code having a <br />provision for lot averaging it can then be said that a reduction from 100 ft. is a reasonable <br />request. Also, due to the west side of the property holding the septic system there is not <br />another location where it could be constructed. <br />5) Unique Circumstances the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to <br />the property not created by the landowner; <br />Variance from Minimum Structure Setback from OHWL: With respect to the <br />proposed variance for setback from the OHWL (924 Elevation) of the structure, the plight <br />is unique and has not been caused by the Applicant. The OWHL does come up quite far on <br />the property which forces the court closer to the front of the lot. Also, with the front lot <br />line sitting in the middle of Lake Jane Rd it does requires the court to sit 30 ft. from the <br />ROW instead of the front lot line. To reasonably place and design a court around the front <br />and rear setback requirements is not possible and would not allow the property to build a <br />court. <br />6) Character of Locality the proposed variance will not alter the essential character of the <br />locality in which the property in question is located; <br />Variance from Minimum Structure Setback from OHWL: With respect to the <br />proposed variance for setback from the OHWL of the structure, the proposed variance will <br />not alter the essential character of the locality. The property owners have already <br />installed landscaping along Lake Jane road which will screen the court from the roadway <br />and neighboring properties. Also, there are other structures such as pools and tennis <br />courts on neighboringproperties which are similar in nature. <br />7) Adjacent Properties and Traffic the proposed variance will not impair an adequate <br />supply of light and air to properties adjacent to the property in question or substantially <br />increase the congestion of the public streets or substantially diminish or impair property <br />values within the neighborhood; <br />Variance from Minimum Structure Setback from OHWL: With respect to the <br />proposed variance for the setback from the OHWL, the proposed variance will not impair <br />an adequate supply of light and air to the adjacent property or substantially increase the <br />congestion of the public streets or substantially diminish property values. With the court <br />being flat it will not negatively impact the neighboring properties as required by the <br />variance criteria. Furthermore, the court is not expected to substantially diminish or <br />impair property values within the neighborhood. <br />