My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-052
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
Resolutions (1970's to 2020)
>
2020's
>
2022
>
2022-052
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2025 2:34:56 PM
Creation date
4/11/2023 2:21:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
dwelling unit in residential districts. Up to two curb cuts may be allowed when neither <br />access is onto a collector or arterial street, when there is a minimum of 40 feet of <br />spacing between driveway curb radii, and when the total width of both driveways does <br />not exceed 26 feet. Because the proposed driveway is 24 feet across and the existing <br />driveway is 22.6 feet across, the applicant is asking for a variance to finish paving the <br />newly constructed driveway by adding a second curb cut on the property. <br />4) Practical Difficulties as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the <br />property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by an <br />official control: <br />The applicant is unable to connect the newly constructed driveway from the garage <br />addition to the existing driveway due to the topography of the parcel. A hill and retaining <br />wall currently separate the two driveways (see attached photos for reference). The <br />applicant chose to construct the garage addition on the east side of the property, <br />downhill from the existing driveway, due to the presence of mature pine trees on the west <br />side of the property. To construct the garage on the west side of the property, where the <br />applicant would have been able to connect the newly constructed driveway to the existing <br />driveway using one curb cut, the applicant would have needed to remove natural stone <br />retaining walls and relocated the current electrical service on the property. Without the <br />addition of the second curb cut at the end of the newly constructed driveway, the property <br />owners would run into issues with rocks and mud, especially during periods of'rain and <br />snow melt. <br />5) Unique Circumstances the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances not created by <br />the landowner: <br />The subject property is located on a hill, putting the east side of the property downhill from <br />the west side. This topography prevents the applicant from connecting the newly <br />constructed driveway to the existing driveway at a single curb cut entrance point. The <br />garage addition was constructed downhill form the main dwelling, on the east side of the <br />property, due to the location of natural stone retaining walls, mature pine trees, and <br />electrical equipment on the west side of the property. <br />6) Character of Locality the proposed variance will not alter the essential character of the <br />locality in which the property in question is located: <br />The proposed second curb cut connecting to the newly constructed driveway will not alter <br />the character of the surrounding neighborhood. The driveway is already constructed, and <br />the applicant is now requesting a variance to pave a second curb cut at the end of the <br />driveway. <br />7) Adjacent Properties and Traffic the proposed variance will not impair an adequate <br />supply of light and air to properties adjacent to the property in question or substantially <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.