My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01 - 2013 Full Resolution Book
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
Resolutions (1970's to 2020)
>
2010's
>
2013
>
01 - 2013 Full Resolution Book
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2025 2:36:45 PM
Creation date
7/3/2023 12:37:09 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WHERE AS, Paragraph 3(i)(0) of Council Resolution No. 2005-20 requires the City to pay the <br />Metropolitan Council by January 31, 2011 a "wastewater inefficiency fee" (WIF) if the City does not <br />meet its REC commitments in the 2007 to 2010 timeframe; and <br />WHEREAS, the WIF is intended to help pay the operation, maintenance, and capital costs of <br />underutilized regional wastewater infrastructure and the costs of providing regional sewer service for <br />development elsewhere in the region that would have occurred within the City; and <br />WHEREAS, the City requested temporary relief from the WIF payment due in January 2011 <br />because the prolonged downturn of the economy has made it difficult for the City to meet its population, <br />household and REC commitments for the 2007 to 2010 timeframe; and <br />WHEREAS, on March 4, 2010 the Metropolitan Council adopted Council Resolution No. 2010- <br />08 and agreed to provide the City with the requested relief, and <br />WHEREAS, the City authorized execution of an amended Memorandum of Understanding at its <br />November 16, 2010 meeting acknowledging the City's continuing agreement to comply with the <br />requirements of and conditions of Stated in Resolution 2005-20,- and <br />WHEREAS, the City prepared an amendment to its Comprehensive Plan that was reviewed by <br />the Metropolitan Council at its February 27, 2013 meeting; and <br />WHEREAS, said Comprehensive Plan amendment reflects the City's efforts to plan consistent <br />with the Memorandum of Understanding as amended and included revised population, household, and <br />sewer staging forecasts consistent with the relief authorized under Metropolitan Council Resolution No. <br />2010-08,- and <br />WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council authorized the City to place the Comprehensive Plan <br />amendment into effect at its February 27, 2013 meeting-, and <br />WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council additionally adopted Resolution No. 2013-01 at it <br />February 27, 2013 meeting, which modified and clarified the scope and nature of the Memorandum of <br />Understanding to address planning issues brought out by the City's Comprehensive Plan amendment an <br />to specifically reflect a revised schedule for development through 2030; and <br />WHEREAS, the modification/clarification made by Resolution No. 2013-01 is effective on the <br />date the Metropolitan Council and the City enter into a binding agreement under which the City <br />acknowledges the modification/clarification and states its continuing agreement to comply with the <br />requirements and conditions stated in previous Council resolutions and the Memoranda of Understanding <br />entered into by the Metropolitan Council and the City; and <br />WHEREAS, as the Metropolitan Council updates its metropolitan development guide it will <br />examine forecasted growth through 2040 and continue a dialogue with the City regarding long-term <br />forecasted growth and pace of growth for the City; and <br />WHEREAS; It is the City's expectation that periodic, discussions will continue with the Met <br />Council regarding the status of economic activity in order to continue to consider potential future <br />adjustments to the MOU in the following areas: 1) the potential for the City to propose alternative C <br />fees), 2) the overall number of mandated REC units that are appropriate based o <br />considerations (in lieu f e emat RE <br />the current and anticipated market demand for housing and commercial development, 3) the potential to <br />evaluate the long term viability of the current scope and pace of mandated development, and in particular <br />to extend the scope of the agreement out to 2040 given current and anticipated economic conditions, the <br />2010 census report, and any 2014 framework evaluations conducted by the State Legislature and/or the <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.