Laserfiche WebLink
category from this map to change all parcels that are currently guided as RAD-ALT (2.0 <br />units per acre) to RAD — Rural Agricultural Density (0.45 units per acre). The proposed <br />amendment will also eliminate all other references to RAD-ALT in the Comprehensive Plan, <br />4) That the Comprehensive Plan Amendment will apply to property legally described in the <br />attached Exhibit "A", <br />5) That the revised Met Council "Thrive 2040" population and household forecast for the City <br />of Lake Elmo and the elimination of the 2005 MOU between the City and Met Council has <br />reduced the pressure for additional growth and development within the City's rural <br />development (unsewered) areas. <br />6) That higher density residential development is encouraged in areas that will be served by <br />public sanitary sewer where the provision of these services is more cost-effective and where <br />the City has either invested or is planning to invest in significant infrastructure <br />improvements. <br />7) That the Housing Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan specifically states that any future <br />higher density housing in Lake Elmo, including senior -specific housing, will be best <br />accommodated within the Old Village Area or 1-94 corridor due to proximity to goods, <br />services, and public facilities, <br />8) That the three existing parcels guided for RAD-ALT development do not demonstrate any <br />characteristics that are substantially different from other areas guided for RAD development <br />in the City of Lake Elmo or that would indicate that higher density development is more <br />appropriate in this area than any other site within the City. <br />9) That the City is has recently adopted major Comprehensive Plan amendment related to <br />development in the Old Village Area and the 1-94 corridor, Given the current market <br />conditions, the City encourages higher density development in areas that would help off -set <br />the significant infrastructure costs required to serve these areas. <br />10) That higher density housing is not consistent with the City's stated goals to preserve and <br />enhance its rural character, especially when planned in areas that are guided for Rural <br />Agricultural Density, <br />11) That build -out of existing empty lots in platted and developed OP developments is <br />encouraged over the creation of new development and service areas in the community <br />12) That new access that would be needed to support development on the existing RAD-ALT <br />parcels does not conform to the City's Transportation Plan that encourages limited access to <br />major collector roads and is inconsistent with the City's access spacing guidelines. <br />13) That the 2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment for property at 943 )4 Stillwater Boulevard <br />North was designed to accommodate a specific development proposal which no longer <br />exists. <br />