Laserfiche WebLink
3. That the Final PUD Plan complies with the general intent of the C- Commercial zoning <br />district with PUD modifications. <br />4. That the Final PUD Plan generally complies with the Lake Elmo Design Guidelines and <br />Standards Manual. <br />5. That the final plat generally complies with the City's Subdivision regulations. <br />6. That the final plat generally complies with the City's design standards. <br />7. That the final plat generally complies with the City's Zoning Code with the exceptions <br />provided for in the PUD. <br />8. That the final plat and PUD Plan must be revised to address the comments noted in the City <br />Engineer's memorandum. <br />9. That the final PUD Plan must be revised to be consistent with City's landscape plan and tree <br />replacement standards pursuant to the Landscape Architects memo. <br />10. That the final plat and PUD Plan must be revised to address the comments noted in the Fire <br />Department memo. <br />11. That the final PUD Plan meets the minimum requirements for a PUD. <br />12. That the final PUD Plan meets items a, c, d, and i from the identified PUD objectives <br />identified in Section 105.12.1130. Planned unit developments should not be allowed simply <br />for the purpose of increasing overall density or allowing development that otherwise could <br />not be approved. <br />a) Innovation in land development techniques that may be more suitable for a given parcel <br />than conventional approaches. The shared access drive and stormwater ponding areas <br />allow for more efficient use of land. <br />c) Establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. This overall PUD <br />provides a buffer between the interstate highway and residential uses. There are <br />significant site specific plantings proposed to buffer the adjacent residential uses and to <br />the most reasonable extent possible, existing trees are being preserved within the buffer <br />area. <br />d) Provision of more adequate, usable, and suitably located open space, recreational <br />amenities, natural resource protection and other public facilities than would otherwise be <br />provided under conventional land development techniques. This is achieved with shared <br />stormwater ponding. <br />i) Creation of more efficient provision of public utilities and services, lessened demand on <br />transportation, and/or the promotion of energy resource conservation. With the proposed <br />private access drive, there will be less demand on public services. <br />13. That the site will be served by public utilities, not have a detrimental impact on traffic, supply <br />adequate off-street parking. <br />14. That the proposed land uses will be compatible both in terms of internal site plans, and with <br />regard to adjacent land uses. <br />15. That the site complies with wetland, stormwater management requirements. <br />