Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />December 5, 2023 <br /> <br /> <br />City of Lake Elmo Planning Commission <br />3880 Laverne Ave. N. <br />Lake Elmo, MN 55042 <br /> <br />Re: Variance Renewal Request re: 8012 Hill Trl N., Lake Elmo, MN 55042 <br /> <br /> <br />Dear Planning Commission Members: <br /> <br />This letter is to provide you with information and documents for purposes of considering our request <br />to revive the variance we were granted via Resolution No. 2022-064. This relates to the impervious <br />surface area requirement applicable to the above property, as governed by Section 154.800 Shoreland <br />Management Overlay District, Subd(C)(3), at table 17-3 Shoreland Standards, capping impervious lot <br />coverage on an unsewered lot at 15%. <br /> <br />As a brief history, after Resolution No. 2022-064 was passed, our builder at the time, Zawadski <br />Homes, began collecting detailed bidding information from subcontractors in order to price out the <br />project they had designed for us. Despite our requests for cost information during the pre-application <br />design process, we were told that the variance would need to be obtained first. As it turned out, the <br />project turned out to be cost-prohibitive. <br /> <br />We are committed to staying in Lake Elmo and staying in our house, preserving as much of the original <br />house as possible (rather than rebuilding completely). To move forward, we decided to switch builders <br />and re-design the project with a builder that would help us make cost-effective decisions throughout <br />the design process. Doing so allowed us to cut the total cost significantly, however, it did take a <br />significant amount of time. <br /> <br />The original builder was also an applicant for the variance we were granted via Resolution No. 2022- <br />064. As we (Anne and Dan Stoudt) are not in the business of construction/renovating homes, and with <br />this being our first and only experience seeking and obtaining a variance, we were unaware of the need <br />to take action to extend the variance once it became necessary to switch builders and start the design <br />process over from scratch. With the original builder no longer involved in the process, no one was <br />carefully monitoring the deadline mandated by Resolution No. 2022-064. As a result, the one-year <br />deadline attached to Resolution No. 2022-064 came and went without our awareness. Now that we <br />have finalized a new, doable plan to add onto our home to make it suit the needs of our family, we are <br />applying a second time for a variance, for the exact same reasons. <br /> <br />