Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />The stated purpose of the section is to protect, preserve and enhance the surface waters, and conserve <br />environmental values. With this addition, we are proposing a 100% mitigation of all new hard surface <br />water runoff with a complete French drain system that directs and contains roof runoff to rain garden <br />containment ponds. Roof water on the front of the home will be directed away from the lake and will <br />dissipate into the ground. Because of the current driveway’s slope downward toward the existing garage, <br />we have experienced excess water flowage into the garage and at the lowest level of patio in front of the <br />house. The new driveway will be graded in a much better way, to divert some of that flow away from the <br />house and toward the grassy front lawn, to eliminate some of those flooding issues. <br /> <br />Water going toward the lake will have an improved drainage feature of a French drain to a rain garden in <br />addition to the 100 feet of slope down to the lake, which is being maintained in its natural, wild state that <br />allows for natural percolation. <br /> <br />e. Narrative regarding any pre-application discussions with staff, and an explanation of how the issue <br />was addressed leading up to the application for a variance. <br /> <br />Regarding our prior application, we reached out to Ben Prchal in 2022 via phone and email for purposes <br />of obtaining information about the variance application process and clarifying the specific code section we <br />are concerned with. Mr. Prchal answered our questions. Ultimately that variance request was granted. <br />Regarding this renewed request, we the homeowners, as well as our builder, Sean Kane, have recently <br />communicated with Ms. Sophia Jensen about re-applying and completing this application. <br /> <br />f. Explain why the strict enforcement of this chapter would cause practical difficulties because of <br />circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. <br /> <br /> Strict enforcement of the code denies us the use of a functional garage, creating inconvenience <br />and parking issues. The tuck-under garage located on the west side of our current home was built <br />in such a way that only compact cars may actually fit inside. We are a family of six, and our vehicles <br />are not compact. They do not fit in the garage. For obvious reasons, this creates inconveniences in <br />the winter months, when we must park outside. In addition, because our street is a strict “No Parking” <br />zone, we have severe limitations with parking for our guests, as our own cars must occupy a significant <br />portion of our driveway. To remedy this practical difficulty, we are proposing the addition of a <br />normal-sized garage on the east side of our home. This cannot be done without increasing the <br />footprint of our home to further exceed the 15% cap on impervious surface area. <br /> <br /> Strict enforcement of the code denies us the ability to give each of our kids a bedroom, and <br />would force us to eventually move. Our home has 3 bedrooms, including the master. We have 4 <br />kids, ages 11, 8, 6 and 5. Currently, our 5- and 6-year-olds share the master bedroom with us. This <br />arrangement will not work into the distant future. We are proposing the addition of more bedrooms <br />below the new garage on the east side of our home, which we feel is the most efficient way to <br />accomplish the addition of bedrooms to our home. <br /> <br />g. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and not created by the <br />landowner. <br /> <br />Our lot is long and narrow and the current house lacks (1) an adequate garage and (2) enough bedrooms. <br />On a larger parcel that is wider, there would be more flexibility as to placement and size of the addition. <br />Given the unique narrowness, lot size and distance of setbacks, we were somewhat limited as to the location <br />and size of the addition. From front to back, the existing home is already tucked close to the bluff setback. <br />As a result, (a) the driveway is already relatively long, using up a significant portion of the impervious <br />surface area, and (b) the placement of any addition without violating the bluff and perimeter setbacks was <br />a challenge. After exploring several ideas, our projected plan is the result of careful consideration of all <br />setbacks and adherence thereto. The result is that the driveway, in addition to being long enough to reach