Laserfiche WebLink
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION <br />& PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) APPLICATION <br />UPDATE 01.08.23 <br /> <br />supportive depending on the nature of the proposal and feedback from the community, planning <br />commission, and City Council. <br /> <br /> Response: Kindly review the earlier comments regarding revisions to the landscape and <br />screening plans. The Applicant is seeking a deviation from the City’s screening requirements, as <br />previously explained. <br /> <br />Comment 5: Road width reduction – Staff have discussed the proposed road width reduction <br />(32-28’) as requested by the Applicant and planning commission. Staff are willing to consider <br />and possibly support the width reduction but with the following items addressed: (a) All <br />buildings, including twin homes, must be sprinkled; (b) A parking diagram should be submitted <br />to detail where parking will be located on-street if parking is only allowed on one side of the <br />street. I think detailing how much parking would be lost going from both to one side of the street <br />parking would also be helpful; (c) Areas where additional parking can be located for visitor stalls <br />on the site should be identified. One such area appears to be in the area east of Block 2, unit 23; <br />(d) An approval may be conditioned upon the addition of language to the eventual leases <br />requiring that garage areas be used for parking of vehicles (as opposed to storage, as is often the <br />case) such that the driveways remain open for visitors to park. This would be intended to <br />reducing parking issues during peak utilization periods such as with holidays and events. <br /> <br /> Response: <br />a. The townhome structures are required to have sprinklers as per the state building <br />code, and the Applicant’s plans already include a sprinkler system for these units. <br />Twin homes are not mandated to have a sprinkler system under the state building <br />code. The Applicant wishes to express its concerns about the financial impact this <br />requirement would have on the total project costs. In light of this, the Applicant is <br />seeking a thorough understanding of the rationale behind this requirement and its <br />connection to the Applicant’s request to reduce the street width to 28’ which is in <br />alignment with other neighborhood streets. <br /> <br />b. Each unit provides ample parking space for four vehicles – two stall garages and a <br />driveway capable of accommodating two additional parked cars. This results in a total <br />of 192 parking spaces for 48 units, surpassing the city code requirements. The <br />Applicant is confident that even if the city decides to limit on-street parking to one <br />side of the street, there will be no parking shortage. It’s noteworthy that despite being <br />classified as a multifamily housing community, the housing product type is designed <br />to resemble a single-family home community, complete with two-stall garages and <br />driveways, aligning with the resident behavior of a twin and town home community <br />and a single-family home community. <br /> <br />c. The Applicant’s residential leases already incorporate provisions prohibiting residents <br />from using the garage stall as a storage unit. This measure is primarily done for safety <br />purposes.