Laserfiche WebLink
Table 9. Step 3 Evaluation Matrix <br />Alternative ID <br />Primary Transportation Needs <br />Vehicle Safe I SSI Score <br />Vehicle Mobility <br />Ratir? <br />TotalNetwork Delay (96 <br />Network I change from No Build)D0 <br />Rating <br />TH 36 Average Travel Time (% <br />Travel change from No Build) <br />Time Rating <br />CSAH 17 Average Travel Time (96 <br />Travel change from No Buildl <br />Time I Rating <br />TH 36 I Maximum Queue Length N/A <br />No Build <br />5 <br />Overpass With <br />Buttonhook <br />Ramps <br />55 <br />Tight Diamond <br />Interchange <br />(Conventional <br />Intersections) <br />57 <br />Tight Diamond <br />Interchange <br />(Roundabouts) <br />66 <br />Poor <br />Good <br />Good <br />Good <br />-5796 <br />-59'% <br />-61% <br />Poor <br />Good <br />Good <br />Good <br />0 <br />-14% <br />-14% <br />-14% <br />Poor <br />Good <br />Good <br />Good <br />Exit <br />Ramp <br />Queue <br />Spillback <br />Rating <br />Secondary Transportation Needs <br />MMLOS (% design <br />criteria with no flags) <br />_ Rating <br />Additional Consi erations & SEE Impacts <br />Walkability/ <br />Bikeabitity <br />Future Local <br />Roadways <br />Access <br />Management <br />Guidelines <br />2040 TPP <br />Appendix F <br />Property <br />Impacts <br />Maximum Out <br />of Direction <br />Travel <br />Wetlands <br />Does/does not preclude <br />Ratijre <br />Intersections Added on <br />CSAH 17 <br />Rating <br />Criteria met <br />Rating <br />Relocations 0 <br />Rating <br />Out of direction travel to <br />access TH 36 or CSAH 17 0 <br />(mil <br />Ratin�gg <br />aci s s <br />0 <br />Poor <br />N /A <br />58% <br />Fair <br />_ g <br />Environmental Impacts <br />Justice" Rating <br />Threatened & <br />Endangered <br />Impacts <br />Species Rating <br />Does not <br />Good <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />N/A <br />Good <br />-84% -82% -77% <br />Good <br />No <br />Good <br />83% <br />Good <br />Does not <br />Good <br />0 <br />Good <br />5 criteria <br />Good <br />1 relocation <br />Fair <br />0.5 rule <br />Good <br />No <br />Good <br />86% <br />Good <br />Does not <br />Good <br />2 <br />Poor <br />5 criteria <br />Good <br />2 relocations <br />Poor <br />0 <br />Good <br />No <br />Good <br />91% <br />Good <br />Does not <br />Good <br />1 <br />Fair <br />5 criteria <br />Good <br />2 relocations <br />Poor <br />0 <br />Good <br />Fair <br />Good <br />Good? <br />None <br />Good <br />�yNoo� <br />I(iood <br />No <br />impact <br />Good <br />0.24 acres <br />Fair <br />No <br />I(iood <br />Good <br />59 acre project <br />footprint <br />Fair <br />0.02 acres <br />Fair <br />No <br />Impact <br />Good <br />62 acre project <br />footprint <br />Fair <br />0.02 acres <br />Fair <br />No <br />Impact <br />Good <br />62 acre project <br />footprint <br />Fair <br />