Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 63 <br /> <br />APPENDIX A. DETAILS OF DATA COLLECTION METHODS <br /> <br />This study evaluated the safety of marked and unmarked crosswalks at uncontrolled locations, that is, at <br />crossings with no traffic signals or stop signs on the approach. Therefore, the data collection activities <br />were undertaken to: (1) select suitable marked and unmarked crosswalks, and (2) obtain pedestrian crash <br />and exposure data. Data collection was conducted in five steps, which are discussed below. <br /> <br />STEP 1—INVENTORY CROSSWALKS AND CONTROL SITES <br /> <br />Through conversations with city traffic engineers and pedestrian/bike coordinators, 28 cities and 2 <br />counties were selected for crosswalk inventory. Either the Highway Safety Research Center (HSRC) staff <br />or local data collectors performed the inventory by driving along selected streets in each city. These <br />streets were in the downtown area, other commercial areas, and built-up residential areas, where marked <br />crosswalks at uncontrolled locations were known or expected to be present. The inventory data collection <br />form is shown in figure 41. <br /> <br />STEP 2—RECORD DATA ON INVENTORY SHEETS <br /> <br />For most cities, the inventory of crosswalk and comparison sites was recorded on videotape. An HSRC <br />staff member watched the videotapes and completed a crosswalk inventory form (see figure 42). Several <br />local data collectors filled out the inventory form directly and mailed the completed forms to HSRC. This <br />process was used both to select unmarked crosswalks (i.e., matched comparison sites—see step 3) and to <br />extract relevant information about the marked crosswalks. <br /> <br />Location Description <br /> <br />For record-keeping purposes, each marked crosswalk and matching comparison site was assigned a site <br />number. Street or route refers to the main road that the pedestrian crosses, and intersecting street is the <br />side street that crosses or forms a “T” with the main road. The leg (east, west, north, south) where the <br />crosswalk or comparison site exists was recorded. If there were crosswalks on both legs (east and west or <br />north and south) of the same intersection, they were assigned two site numbers and listed separately. <br />Midblock location was noted when appropriate, along with the intersecting streets to either side. A total <br />of 827 intersection and 173 midblock marked crosswalks were used in the analysis, with an equal number <br />of matched comparison sites. <br /> <br />Number of Lanes <br /> <br />The total number of lanes, including any turn lanes, that a pedestrian must cross was recorded. Figure 43 <br />shows the distribution of the 1,000 marked crosswalks that were used in the analysis according to the <br />number of lanes. Nearly half (45.8 percent) of the sites were on two-lane roads, with about one third of <br />the sites on four-lane roads. <br /> <br />Median Type <br /> <br />The median type was recorded as either none, raised, or painted. Two-way left-turn lanes were <br />considered to be traffic lanes. There was no median for about two-thirds of the 1,000 marked (and <br />unmarked) crosswalks that were used in the analysis. Raised medians were present for 14 percent of the <br />marked (and unmarked) crosswalks, and painted medians, about 15 percent. <br /> <br />