My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#02 - Cross Walk Discussion
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020's
>
2024
>
04-09-24 W
>
#02 - Cross Walk Discussion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2025 1:20:56 PM
Creation date
8/16/2024 2:15:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Technical Report Documentation Page <br />1. Report No. 2. 3. Recipients Accession No. <br />MN 2020RIC01 <br />4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date <br />Pedestrian Crosswalk Policy Development Guidelines May 2020 <br />6. <br /> <br />7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. <br />Kate Miner, PE, PTOE, Tim Arvidson, PE <br />9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. <br />Stonebrooke Engineering <br />12279 Nicollet Avenue <br />Burnsville, Minnesota 5537 <br /> <br />11. Contract (C) or Grant (G) No. <br />(c) 1033236 <br /> <br />12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered <br />Local Road Research Board <br />Minnesota Department of Transportation <br />Office of Research & Innovation <br />395 John Ireland Boulevard, MS 330 <br />St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899 <br />Final Report <br />14. Sponsoring Agency Code <br /> <br />15. Supplementary Notes <br />http://mndot.gov/research/reports/2020/2020RIC01.pdf <br />http://mndot.gov/research/reports/2020/2020RIC01G.pdf <br />16. Abstract (Limit: 250 words) <br />This study was driven by the need to improve consistency in the methods and approach that local agencies use to <br />address crosswalks. This study focuses on the question of how a crosswalk should be enhanced with additional <br />countermeasures, if any, once the decision is made to mark it. During the research portion of this project, it was <br />found that the primary information agencies use that provides guidance for decisions on how to mark crosswalks <br />comes from the Federal Highway Administration. A quick reference guide was developed from FHWA’s Guide for <br />Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations, July 2018, that will help agencies determine <br />when to use different countermeasures based on roadway type, vehicle volumes, and posted speed limits. In <br />addition, fact sheets for twelve countermeasures identified in the document were developed to explain what the <br />benefit of each one is, when it is best applied, and how to provide high-level planning cost for each one. <br />17. Document Analysis/Descriptors 18. Availability Statement <br />Pedestrians, Crosswalks, Unsignalized intersections <br /> <br />No restrictions. Document available from: <br />National Technical Information Services, <br />Alexandria, Virginia 22312 <br />19. Security Class (this report) 20. Security Class (this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price <br />Unclassified Unclassified <br /> <br /> <br />54 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.