My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#02 - Cross Walk Discussion
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020's
>
2024
>
04-09-24 W
>
#02 - Cross Walk Discussion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2025 1:20:56 PM
Creation date
8/16/2024 2:15:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Figure 21. Illustration of multiple-threat pedestrian crash. <br /> <br />A total of 17.6 percent (33 out of 188) of the pedestrian crashes in marked crosswalks were classified as <br />multiple threat. None of the 41 pedestrian crashes in unmarked crosswalks was a multiple-threat crash. <br />This finding may be the result of one or more of the following factors: <br />• Drivers may be more likely to stop and yield to pedestrians in marked crosswalks compared to <br />unmarked crossings, since at least one motorist must stop for a pedestrian to set up a multiple-threat <br />pedestrian collision. Also, pedestrians may be more likely to step out in front of oncoming traffic in a <br />marked crosswalk than at an unmarked location in some instances. <br /> <br />• A second explanation is related to the fact that most of the total pedestrians who are crossing <br />multilane roads are crossing in a marked crosswalk (66.1 percent), as shown earlier in figure 14. <br />Furthermore, of the pedestrian age groups most at risk (the young and the old), an even greater <br />proportion of these pedestrians are choosing to cross multilane roads in marked crosswalks (76 <br />percent and 81.3 percent, respectively). <br /> <br />• Another possible explanation could be that some pedestrians crossing in a marked crosswalk may be <br />less likely to search properly for vehicles (compared to an unmarked crossing) when stepping out past <br />a stopped vehicle and into an adjacent lane (i.e., pedestrians not realizing that they need to search for <br />other oncoming vehicles after one motorist stops for them). <br /> <br />Further research on pedestrian and motorist behavior could help to gain a better understanding of the <br />causes and potential effects of countermeasures (e.g., advance stop lines) related to these crashes. There <br />is also a need to examine the current laws and level of police enforcement (and a possible need for <br />changes in the laws) on motorist responsibility to yield to pedestrians and how these laws differ between <br />States. A distribution of pedestrian crash types, which includes all of the 229 pedestrian collisions at the <br />2,000 study sites, is shown in figure 22. <br /> <br />Motorists failing to yield (on through movements) represented a large percentage of pedestrian crashes in <br />marked crosswalks (41.5 percent) and unmarked crosswalks (31.7 percent). Likewise, vehicle turn and <br />merge crashes, also generally the fault of the driver, accounted for 19.2 percent (marked crosswalks) and <br />12.2 percent (unmarked crosswalks) of such crashes (see figure 22). These results indicate a strong need <br /> 41
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.