My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#02 - Cross Walk Discussion
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020's
>
2024
>
04-09-24 W
>
#02 - Cross Walk Discussion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2025 1:20:56 PM
Creation date
8/16/2024 2:15:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />a negative measure that will necessarily increase pedestrian crashes. Marked crosswalks are appropriate <br />at some locations (e.g., at selected low-speed, two-lane streets at downtown crossing locations) to help <br />channel pedestrians to preferred crossing locations, but other roadway improvements are also necessary <br />(e.g., raised medians, traffic-calming treatments, traffic and pedestrian signals when warranted, or other <br />substantial crossing improvement) when used at other locations. The guidelines presented in table 11 are <br />intended to provide guidance for installing marked crosswalks and other pedestrian crossing facilities. <br /> <br />Note that speed limit was used in table 11 in addition to ADT, number of lanes, and presence of a median. <br />In developing the table, roads with higher speed limits (higher than 64.4 km/h (40 mi/h)) were considered <br />to be inappropriate for adding marked crosswalks alone. This is because virtually no uncontrolled, <br />marked crosswalk sites where speed limits exceed 64.4 km/h (40 mi/h) were found in the 30 U.S. cities <br />used in this study. Thus, these types of high-speed, uncontrolled marked crosswalks could not be <br />included in the analysis. Also, high-speed roadways present added problems for pedestrians and thus <br />require more substantial treatments in many cases. That may be why Germany, Finland, and Norway do <br />not allow uncontrolled crosswalks on roads with high speed limits.(30) <br /> <br />For three-lane roads, adding marked crosswalks alone (without other substantial treatments) is generally <br />not recommended for ADTs greater than 12,000, although exceptions may be allowed under certain <br />conditions (e.g., lower speed limits). <br /> <br />If nothing else is done beyond marking crosswalks at an uncontrolled location, pedestrians will not <br />experience increased safety (under any situations included in the analysis). This finding is in some ways <br />consistent with the companion study by Knoblauch et al. that found that marking a crosswalk would not <br />necessarily increase the number of motorists that will stop or yield to pedestrians.(13) Research from <br />Europe shows the need for pedestrian improvements beyond uncontrolled crosswalks.(17,21) <br /> <br />53
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.