My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#02 - Cross Walk Discussion
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020's
>
2024
>
04-09-24 W
>
#02 - Cross Walk Discussion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2025 1:20:56 PM
Creation date
8/16/2024 2:15:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />In some situations (e.g., low-speed, two-lane streets in downtown areas), installing a marked crosswalk <br />may help consolidate multiple crossing points. Engineering judgment should be used to install <br />crosswalks at preferred crossing locations (e.g., at a crossing location at a streetlight as opposed to an <br />unlit crossing point nearby). While overuse of marked crossings at uncontrolled locations should be <br />avoided, higher priority should be placed on providing crosswalk markings where pedestrian volume <br />exceeds about 20 per peak hour (or 15 or more elderly pedestrians and/or children per peak hour). <br /> <br />Marked crosswalks and other pedestrian facilities (or lack of facilities) should be routinely monitored to <br />determine what improvements are needed. <br /> <br />POSSIBLE MEASURES TO HELP PEDESTRIANS <br /> <br />Although simply installing marked crosswalks by themselves cannot solve pedestrian crossing problems, <br />the safety needs of pedestrians must not be ignored. More substantial engineering and roadway <br />treatments need to be considered, as well as enforcement and education programs and possibly new <br />legislation to provide safer and easier crossings for pedestrians at problem locations. Transportation and <br />safety engineers have a responsibility to consider all types of road users in roadway planning, design, and <br />maintenance. Pedestrians must be provided with safe facilities for travel. <br /> <br />A variety of pedestrian facilities have been found to improve pedestrian safety and/or ability to cross the <br />street under various conditions. (See references 16, 31, 32, 33, and 34.) Examples of pedestrian <br />improvements include: <br /> <br />• Providing raised medians (figure 31) or intersection crossing islands on multilane roads, which can <br />significantly reduce the pedestrian crash rate and also facilitate street crossing. Also, raised medians <br />may provide aesthetic improvement and may control access to prevent unsafe turns out of driveways. <br />Refuge islands should be at least 1.2 m (4 ft) wide (and preferably 1.8 to 2.4 m (6 to 8 ft) wide) and of <br />adequate length to allow pedestrians to stand and wait for gaps in traffic before crossing the second <br />half of the street. When built, the landscaping should be designed and maintained to provide good <br />visibility between pedestrians and approaching motorists. <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 31. Raised medians and crossing islands can <br />improve pedestrian safety on multilane roads. <br /> <br /> <br />• Installing traffic signals (with pedestrian signals), where warranted (see figures 32 and 33). <br /> 55
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.