Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />DOCSOPEN\LA515\117\949622.v2-4/26/24 <br />requirements such as density, building height, or impervious surface could be requested. If <br />needed, flexibility must be granted through the variance process. <br /> <br />Planned Unit Development Flexibility Requests <br />It is likely that the Applicant will require flexibility to City standards, the flexibilities that will <br />ultimately be requested are not known at this time. It appears that the multifamily building parcels <br />will be smaller than required by City Code. <br /> <br />Shoreland Variances <br />Flexibility to the City’s Shoreland Overlay requirements may only be granted through a variance <br />review. The following variances to the City’s ordinance are anticipated with the concept layout <br />currently on file: <br />• Maximum Tiered Density – There are too many twinhome units within each of the three <br />tiers. With a maximum density bonus of 20 percent applied to each tier, the proposed units <br />exceed the maximum permitted by the Shoreland PUD ordinance. <br />• Minimum Setback for Twin Home – Proposed twinhomes do not meet the minimum <br />setback which is increased from 200 to 250 feet for PUDs with shoreland preservation. <br />• Impervious Surface – Each platted lot within the shoreland district must be under 30 <br />percent impervious. A majority of the twinhome lots do not appear to comply with this <br />requirement. <br /> <br />Next Steps if Approved: <br />If approved, the Applicant will seek to initiate the EAW process with the project as currently <br />shown in the proposed concept. If the environmental review is completed, and the project changes, <br />the environmental review process may need to be repeated. <br /> <br />Next Steps if Denied: <br />The 2050 Comprehensive Plan will be due to the Metropolitan Council in December of 2028. The <br />City will likely be evaluating development and development potential city wide as part of that <br />update. It is possible the Comprehensive Plan land use or MUSA timeframe may be updated by <br />the City by then. If no changes are made in 2028, the Applicant could come forward on January 1, <br />2030 to request the development to occur on the site. At which time, the City will make a <br />determination if the site is ready to be developed and proper infrastructure readily available. If the <br />City determines the project may be more desirable if modified, the Applicant could seek to change <br />the project plans and reapply. <br /> <br />FISCAL IMPACT: <br />Approval of the Applicant’s requests has no fiscal impact to the City at this time. Subdivision <br />entitlement review will be required along with a Development Agreement which will detail public <br />improvements and address fiscal impacts. When developed, the property will have urban services <br />and will require associated development fees. <br /> <br />FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS: <br />The decision to change or amend the Comprehensive Plan is a policy matter for the City. <br />However, at this time, staff is recommending that the City deny this proposed Comprehensive <br />Plan Amendment. The City Council has recently approved only two modifications to Map 3-7. <br />One time for the North Star development, which had already received final plat approval. The <br />other time that approval was granted was in order to allow the proposed Lake Elmo Elementary to <br />move forward. In that case, the parcel the school was to be located was not in the MUSA, and the <br />change brought it into the MUSA. Staff therefore propose the following findings: