Laserfiche WebLink
<br />& PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) FINAL PLAN APPLICATION <br />architect stated the landscape plan is recommended for approval. The memo did make the <br />following observations. <br /> <br />Tree Preservation: 105. 12. 470 <br /> <br />1. A tree preservation plan has already been submitted that meets all requirements, which <br />means that the updated tree preservation plan will also suffice. H <br />noted that removals of some of trees along the northeast lot line may <br />intended to be preserved. If possible, fell the trees without removing the root sy <br />excavation could impact the critical root zone (CRZ) of <br />105.12.470 (c) (13) b. says that “If an applicant damage <br />that is intended to be preserved to the point that City staff believe <br />survive, the applicant must remit to the City a cash mitigation, calculated per diameter <br />inch of the removed or damaged tree in the amount set <br /> <br />Applicant Response <br /> <br />Landscape Requirements: 105. 12. 480 <br />1. The landscape plan now satisfies the screening requirements. <br />2. Elevations and cross-sections showing the screening approach along the northern edge of <br />the property have been provided to illustrate the proposed mitigation of impacts of the <br />development on less intense adjacent la <br /> <br />FINAL PLAT APPLICATION <br />& PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) FINAL PLAN APPLICATION <br /> <br />plan is recommended for approval. The memo did make the <br /> <br />A tree preservation plan has already been submitted that meets all requirements, which <br />that the updated tree preservation plan will also suffice. However, it should be <br />removals of some of trees along the northeast lot line may impact trees now <br />preserved. If possible, fell the trees without removing the root sy <br />impact the critical root zone (CRZ) of trees intended to be preserved. ** <br />105.12.470 (c) (13) b. says that “If an applicant damages or removes a significant tree <br />that is intended to be preserved to the point that City staff believes the tree will not <br />survive, the applicant must remit to the City a cash mitigation, calculated per diameter <br />inch of the removed or damaged tree in the amount set forth in the City fee schedule. <br />Applicant Response: The Applicant understands the expectation and will comply. <br />Landscape Requirements: 105. 12. 480 <br />satisfies the screening requirements. <br />sections showing the screening approach along the northern edge of <br />property have been provided to illustrate the proposed mitigation of impacts of the <br />development on less intense adjacent land uses. <br />& PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) FINAL PLAN APPLICATION <br />plan is recommended for approval. The memo did make the <br />A tree preservation plan has already been submitted that meets all requirements, which <br />owever, it should be <br />impact trees now <br />preserved. If possible, fell the trees without removing the root system, as <br />trees intended to be preserved. ** <br />or removes a significant tree <br />s the tree will not <br />survive, the applicant must remit to the City a cash mitigation, calculated per diameter <br />forth in the City fee schedule.” <br />on and will comply. <br />sections showing the screening approach along the northern edge of <br />property have been provided to illustrate the proposed mitigation of impacts of the