My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#16 - Highpointe Crossing Preliminary Plat and OP PUD
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020's
>
2024
>
08-20-24
>
#16 - Highpointe Crossing Preliminary Plat and OP PUD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2025 1:35:27 PM
Creation date
10/18/2024 2:17:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Meeting <br />August 20, 2024 Page 6 <br /> <br />Ordinance (1/2 acre lots), a total of 400 trees would be required at 10 per lot. Staff suggest that <br />this be used as the total number of trees required for the development instead of being on a per lot <br />basis. The City’s Landscape Architect finds that the full required number of trees could be supplied <br />on site. <br /> <br />Strictly requiring boulevard tree spacing every 30’ is not practical in several areas of the site. This <br />includes the boulevard areas abutting the powerline easement, and the development entrances <br />where sightlines are a concern, and certain situations where utility buffers and driveways create <br />conflicts. Staff are therefore supportive of a flexibility that would allow an attempt to locate trees <br />at 30’ but no further than 50’ if not practicable. <br /> <br />A condition of approval is suggested to require a minimum of 400 tree plantings, with boulevard <br />tree spacing at no less than 50’, but at 30’ where practicable. <br /> <br />Tree Preservation. The proposed tree preservation plan is acceptable per the City’s Landscape <br />Architect. The Applicant should provide additional detail on how existing trees will be protected <br />during construction on site. <br /> <br />Access. The roadway proposed for this development, called 24th Street North, would be public and <br />is proposed to connect Inwood Avenue North to the current roadway stub of Imperial Avenue <br />North. Given that the first phase units will only have one access, only 30 units can be platted in <br />that phase. An acceptable turnaround will also be required. A condition has been added. <br /> <br />Parking and Driveways. Section 105.12.410 requires 2 spaces per dwelling unit. The homes <br />will have 2 or more enclosed stalls with driveways to accommodate additional visitor parking. <br />Given the width of the right of way, parking will be limited to one side of the street. <br /> <br />Section 9.16.090 details driveway requirements. Driveways must be at least 5 feet from property <br />side yards and must be between 12 and 26 feet in width. Driveways are not shown on the project <br />plans, and locations cannot be verified. As such, driveways must conform to all City standards <br />including location, grade, and surface, when proposed. <br /> <br />Traffic. A trip generation report was submitted by the Applicant’s consultant, S2 Traffic <br />Solutions. The report documents the expected traffic generated from this land use. This land use <br />is anticipated to generate on average a total of 669 trips per day on weekdays. During peak hours, <br />there would be an estimated 50 trips in the AM peak period (highest hour period between 7-9am) <br />and 65 total trips in the PM peak period (highest hour period between 4-6pm). The report concludes <br />that existing infrastructure, and that which is proposed by the developer, is acceptable to <br />accommodate the traffic generated by this use. <br /> <br />Sidewalk and Trail. The City’s subdivision ordinance requires a concrete sidewalk along at <br />least one side of all public streets. One is provided in the plans. OP PUDs are also required to <br />have a paved trail at least the length of the centerline of all public streets. The Applicant is <br />requesting flexibility for 5968 feet of mowed grass trails instead of 3550 feet of paved trails. <br />Preferably, an asphalt trail would be provided. Staff suggest that an asphalt trail be required. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.