My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#16 - Highpointe Crossing Preliminary Plat and OP PUD
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020's
>
2024
>
08-20-24
>
#16 - Highpointe Crossing Preliminary Plat and OP PUD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2025 1:35:27 PM
Creation date
10/18/2024 2:17:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />June 26, 2024 <br />Highpointe Crossing <br /> <br /> <br />Memorandum 2 <br />- Provide a landscape plan sheet showing proposed trees across the full site with keyed areas for each of <br />the zoomed in plan areas for legibility <br />- Planting plans do not meet the required minimum percentage of evergreens. A minimum of 25% of <br />plantings must be evergreen per code. Applicant appears to have the space to plant additional <br />evergreen trees around the site perimeter, which would contribute to resolving the adjacent neighbors’ <br />concerns about viewsheds and bring the development closer to meeting the OP PUD landscaping <br />requirements. Understanding that the intent of this site is primarily to reflect a prairie landscape, if <br />additional evergreens are proposed where they contribute to buffering and the minimum requirement <br />is not yet met, we will consider waiving the remainder required. <br /> The proposed Techny Upright Arborvitae shown in the main entrance planting plan may be <br />counted toward this requirement but does not appear to be reflected in the tree schedule. <br />- Please provide calculations on the planting plans listing total disturbed area and total linear feet of <br />street so that landscaping requirements can be confirmed. <br />- The narrative indicates that the proposer requests the following landscape-related variances: <br />1. 50’ street tree spacing vs 30’ <br />o Assuming roughly 6500 linear feet of roadway based on the narrative (please confirm), 217 <br />street trees are required, but only 130 are proposed. <br />o Street trees may be planted in clusters to achieve the requirement rather than individually, <br />which may be an option to increase tree quantities in some areas. While it makes sense to <br />grant a variance beneath the power lines where trees are not allowed to be planted and in <br />areas where minimum utility offsets cannot be achieved, 30’ spacing is otherwise not <br />unreasonable. Please see how many street trees can reasonably be planted along the <br />proposed roadways beginning with a 30’ spacing and adjusting to ensure required utility <br />offsets. <br />2. 5 trees / lot rather than 10 <br />o The currently proposed 450 trees do not meet even the minimum landscape requirements <br />of a typical development, which would be required include 353 trees (at 5 trees/acre <br />disturbed with 70.72 acres disturbed) in addition to the required street trees. Given that <br />this is an open space PUD and flexibility is already being requested for street trees, <br />additional tree plantings are warranted. The applicant’s efforts to restore native prairie and <br />pollinator habitat are valuable; however, even native savannas have up to 25 trees per acre, <br />and there is plenty of space on site for additional tree planting without compromising the <br />open, rolling prairie aesthetic. Please adjust the plan to add in additional trees, especially <br />along the site boundaries, and see what makes reasonable sense without shading out the <br />intended native seeding. Any tree plantings within the seeded prairie should be fire <br />tolerant to withstand prescribed burns. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.