My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#05 - Right of Way Management
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020's
>
2024
>
09-10-24 W
>
#05 - Right of Way Management
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2025 2:35:06 PM
Creation date
10/18/2024 2:22:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Subp. 2.Amount.The security provided by a construction performance bond must cover an <br />amount reasonably estimated to restore the right-of-way to the condition that existed before the <br />excavation, and may also include reasonable, directly related costs that the local government unit <br />estimates will be incurred if the right-of-way user fails to perform under the bond. Litigation costs <br />and attorney fees are not direct costs to be included in calculating the amount of the bond. <br />Subp. 3.Term.If, 24 months after completion of the restoration of the right-of-way, the <br />representative of the local government unit determines that the right-of-way has been properly <br />restored, the surety on the construction performance bond must be released. <br />Statutory Authority: MS s 237.163 <br />History: 23 SR 2004 <br />Published Electronically:November 14, 2003 <br />7819.3100 RELOCATION OF EXISTING FACILITIES. <br />Subpart 1.Requirement.A right-of-way user shall promptly and at its own expense, with due <br />regard for seasonal working conditions, permanently remove and relocate its facilities in the <br />right-of-way when it is necessary to prevent interference, and not merely for convenience of the <br />local government unit, in connection with: (1) a present or future local government use of the <br />right-of-way for a public project; (2) the public health or safety; or (3) the safety and convenience <br />of travel over the right-of-way. <br />Subp. 2.Exception.Notwithstanding subpart 1, a right-of-way user is not required to remove <br />or relocate its facilities from a right-of-way that has been vacated in favor of a nongovernmental <br />entity unless and until the reasonable costs to do so are first paid to the right-of-way user. <br />Statutory Authority: MS s 237.163 <br />History: 23 SR 2004 <br />Published Electronically:November 14, 2003 <br />7819.3200 RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION. <br />Subpart 1.Reservation of right.If the local government unit vacates a right-of-way that <br />contains the facilities of a right-of-way user and the right-of-way vacation does not require the <br />relocation of the right-of-way user's facilities, the local government unit shall, except when it would <br />not be in the public interest, reserve to and for itself and all right-of-way users having facilities in <br />the vacated right-of-way, the right to install, maintain, and operate facilities in the vacated <br />right-of-way and to enter upon the right-of-way at any time to reconstruct, inspect, maintain, or <br />repair the facilities. <br />Subp. 2.Relocation of facilities.If the local government unit vacates a right-of-way that <br />contains the facilities of a right-of-way user and the right-of-way vacation requires the relocation <br />of the right-of-way user's facilities, payment of the relocation costs must be determined as follows: <br />(1) if the vacation proceedings are initiated by the right-of-way user, the right-of-way user must <br />pay the relocation costs; (2) if the vacation proceedings are initiated by the local government unit <br />Official Publication of the State of Minnesota <br />Revisor of Statutes <br />7819.3200MINNESOTA RULES9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.