Laserfiche WebLink
8 <br /> <br />SUBDIVISION FINDINGS. <br />The process for review of subdivisions is established in Title 103 of City Code. To approve a <br />Preliminary Plat, the City shall make the determination that the project does not meet the findings for <br />denial established in code section 103.00.090(d)(2) as follows: <br />a. That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the city's comprehensive plan, development <br />code, capital improvements program, or other policy or regulation. <br />b. That the physical characteristics of the site, including, but not limited to, topography, vegetation, <br />susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, and retention, are <br />such that the site is not suitable for the type or intensity of development or use contemplated. <br />c. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial <br />and irreversible environmental damage. <br />d. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will be detrimental to the health, <br />safety, or general welfare of the public. <br />e. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvement will conflict with easements on <br />record or with easements established by judgment of a court. <br />f. That the subdivision is premature as determined by the standards of this title. <br /> <br />VARIANCE FINDINGS. <br />An applicant must establish and demonstrate compliance with the variance criteria set forth in Lake <br />Elmo City Code Section 105.12.320 before the City may grant an exception or modification to city code <br />requirements. These criteria are listed below, along with comments from Staff about the applicability of <br />these criteria to the applicant’s request. Staff recommends the following findings: <br /> <br />1) Practical Difficulties. A variance to the provision of this chapter may be granted by the Board of <br />Adjustment upon the application by the owner of the affected property where the strict enforcement <br />of this chapter would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual <br />property under consideration and then only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in <br />keeping with the spirit and intent of this chapter. Definition of practical difficulties - “Practical <br />difficulties” as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner <br />proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by an official control. <br />Parcel Size: The use proposed by the Applicant will be on a property of 47.59 acres less required <br />right of way dedication. The lot area variance is needed due to the desire to locate uses on site <br />outside of the buffer established around the Oakdale Gun Club property, and the need to locate <br />accesses at acceptable distances from the intersection of CSAHs 10 & 17. <br /> <br />Buffer: The northern driveway access to Lake Elmo Avenue is proposed with a distance of <br />approximately 38 feet from the northern lot line. Due to the requirement to meet access spacing <br />requirements intended to protect public safety, the access should not be moved any further south. <br />In the proposed location of the drive is approximately 400 feet away from the residence to the <br />north. <br /> <br />2) Unique Circumstances. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property <br />not created by the landowner. <br />Parcel Size: The Applicant is not proposing to expand the area of the property. The existing <br />conditions on site were not created by the Applicant. <br />