Laserfiche WebLink
LA515\89\988411.v1 <br />Addition. More specifically the Developer has requested that Section 27.A. of the Development Agreement <br />be amended so that it is the same or similar to Section 27.A. of the Easton Village 5th Addition <br />Development Agreement. <br /> <br />Prior to 2023, the City allowed building permits to be issued without the sidewalks being installed and <br />accepted upon completion of certain other items. However, there were some serious issues including <br />damaged sidewalks, sidewalks needing to be replaced, overall continuity of the entire sidewalk length on a <br />block being inconsistent, and excessive staff time spent ensuring the sidewalks were up to City standards. <br />More importantly the developers have not adequately protected the new sidewalks from damage by home <br />building contractors and subcontractors during the 7-day curing period, which can result in a shortened <br />service life for the sidewalk. With its request to amend the Development Agreement, the Developer is <br />requesting language where building permits can be issued prior to sidewalk installation and after public <br />improvements have been installed and tested, but prior to acceptance. If the Council is supportive of the <br />Developer’s request, City staff strongly recommends that the Development Agreement amendment also <br />include the insertion of Section 27.H. from the Northstar 1st Addition Development Agreement in its <br />entirety. This provision is intended to address the requirement for installing sidewalks after the issuance of <br />building permit and is consistent with the City’s standard form of Development Agreement and language <br />used in all previous Easton Village development agreements. <br /> <br />FISCAL IMPACT: <br />• If the Development Agreement is amended, there would be an ample amount of City staff time <br />involved in monitoring compliance and enforcement of the Development Agreement requirements. <br />• There may also be a cost to the City if the sidewalk quality is impaired and requires replacement <br />or repair. <br />• In the past, developers have sought retention of sidewalks that were required to be replaced by <br />Engineering. If the sidewalk is not replaced by the developer during the warranty period, this could <br />result in sidewalks failing and needing to be replaced sooner than scheduled at a cost to the City’s <br />residents. <br /> <br />OPTIONS: <br />1) Approve the second amendment to the Development Agreement Amendment for Easton <br />Village 6th and 7th Additions. <br />2) Deny the second amendment to the Development Agreement Amendment for Easton Village <br />6th and 7th Additions. <br />3) Change the proposed second amendment to the Development Agreement for Easton Village 6th <br />and 7th Additions to say something different than what is being proposed. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends that the City Council deny the proposed second amendment to the Easton Village 6th <br />and 7th Additions Development Agreement. <br /> <br />“Motion to deny the Developer’s request to amend Easton Village 6th and 7th Addition Development <br />Agreement that would to allow building permits to be issued prior to public improvement acceptance <br />and sidewalk installation.” <br /> <br />Should the Council choose to approve the request, a resolution has been drafted such that the <br />Development Agreement can be amended without having to bring it back to Council. This will <br />expedite the building permit issuance process for the Developer as winter is fast approaching. <br />The motion would be as follows: <br /> <br />“Motion to approve Resolution 2024-123 approving the second amendment to the development <br />agreement for Easton Village 6th and 7th Additions.” <br />