Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PUBLIC WORKS ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT 15 <br />ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND STAFFING <br /> <br />Recommendation 2: Use the annual work plan to revisit policies restricting Operator PTO <br /> <br />Recent, temporary, guidelines established within the Department allowed for a maximum of two Public Works <br />Operators approved for PTO per day, a reduction from previous limits of four Operators approved for PTO on a <br />given day. The reduction in this limit, while temporary, is indicative of the strain the Department is experiencing to <br />meet workload demands with available staffing. (This limit has since been lifted.) <br /> <br />The reduced PTO limit negatively affected morale within the Department. Operators have had numerous PTO <br />requests denied, despite some requests being made months in advance, to the point that Operators do not feel that <br />they are likely to be able to take the vacation that they have earned on the dates they would prefer to take it. Given <br />a two-person PTO limit, however, denial of PTO requests is a likely outcome. Given the number of Operator <br />positions (including the Lead Operator), and assuming an average accrual of 7.5 hours of PTO per pay period, plus <br />an additional six days of sick leave per year, the Operators collectively earn almost 2,200 hours of time off each year. <br />In other words, if time off were evenly distributed throughout the year, at least one Operator would be out every <br />working day of the year. Time off requests are not distributed evenly, however. They naturally cluster around <br />holidays and school breaks, which then leads to denials of PTO requests. <br /> <br />While the perception of the need for aggressive PTO limits is understandable (i.e., the sense that Level of Service <br />targets can only be met with a full complement of staff), a change in approach is warranted. First, there is some <br />flexibility as to when some of the Department’s project work must be completed. Of all the work the Department <br />completes in a year, the Department has significant flexibility as to when certain activities are conducted. Secondly, <br />as noted earlier, on average, at least one Operator will be off every workday (assuming all PTO and sick leave is <br />taken). Every day, then, that two or more Operators are on PTO mathematically results in one or more days that the <br />Operators are fully staffed. <br /> <br />Denial of PTO requests has had negative consequences on the Operators’ morale. Raftelis recommends that the <br />Department revisit this limit with the goal of increasing it by using the annual work plan (Recommendation 1) to <br />inform what this limit should be. This recommendation should be considered strategically as the annual work plan <br />is being crafted. When planning certain seasonal projects, consideration should be given to grant PTO requests as <br />part of the planning process. The potential to grant PTO may also be able to fluctuate seasonally based on work <br />needs. Certain weeks of the year might intentionally be identified as “low power” weeks in which no major projects <br />are planned. For example, aligning such a week with the local school district’s schedule for spring break may be <br />advantageous. There is likely to be higher demand for PTO on that week, and as long as the Department is able to <br />meet day-to-day operational needs, the time off that is taken that week will ensure more days of fully staffed operation <br />the remainder of the year. <br /> <br />Expounding on the notion of fluctuating PTO limits, the Department may wish to give special consideration to the <br />snow plowing season (generally considered to be November 1 to March 31). Within the snow plowing season, the <br />Department may not wish to approve so much PTO on any given day that it cannot staff the seven plowing routes <br />in the City should there be a snowstorm. However, given the quality of modern weather forecasting, the Department <br />may wish to grant additional PTO requests with a week’s notice should the forecast be sufficiently clear of potential <br />snow risks. Reportedly, at least a form of this conditional granting of PTO (“approved off pending a snow event”) <br />has been in place for several years. <br /> <br />Ultimately, working to make the PTO that Operators have accrued more easily accessible to them is likely to improve <br />morale within the Department at no fiscal cost and should be considered as the annual work plan is developed.