Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PUBLIC WORKS ORGANIZATIONAL ASSESSMENT 23 <br />work and record their work in the CMMS, and that work order is attached to the asset’s record within the CMMS. <br />Moreover, operators are commonly issued mobile devices so that they can access the CMMS in the field, allowing <br />them to use the GIS capabilities, receive work orders, and fill out the work orders without having to return to the <br />office. <br /> <br />A properly designed and implemented CMMS provides numerous advantages to organizations. It improves <br />workflows, communications, and analysis of asset conditions. It also allows reporting not just of the work that is <br />being done, but the backlog of work that is not being accomplished and may require more resources. It can be an <br />invaluable tool not just for tracking asset conditions but also for tracking workforce conditions. By showing the <br />amount of work that is being accomplished, the ratio of corrective to preventative maintenance that is occurring, and <br />the backlog of work orders, a CMMS can quantitatively make the case as to whether more staff are required. The <br />reports produced by a CMMS can aid leadership in making more informed decisions and be an effective tool to <br />communicate with parties outside the Department. <br /> <br />The City utilizes an asset management software program known as Beehive. Beehive has been in use for several years <br />within the Department and has been utilized to develop the Department’s asset inventory. Unfortunately, Beehive <br />does not include any Parks assets, as the Department has not purchased a Parks module. Additionally, it is not used <br />to its full capability work order system. Operators in the field primarily rely on Beehive for utility locates and GIS <br />mapping, using a mobile app version. In its role as an asset management program, work that is done on the utility <br />system is recorded within Beehive by the Assistant Director following the completion of the work. Work orders are <br />not issued prior to work, negating the ability to plan work or track work backlogs, and the sort of data that would <br />allow for the tracking of level of effort (e.g., labor hours, equipment, and supplies used) is not collected. Rather than <br />the Operators entering all of this data in the field and the Assistant Director performing quality control checks on <br />completed work orders, the Assistant Director enters data on asset status and the type of work performed. <br /> <br />To fully realize the value of Beehive, the Department should implement all of its functionality. This would involve <br />developing the work order capabilities of Beehive to include the most efficient recording of the data for that work. <br />Once a work order is created, it can be assigned to specific Operators, who upon completion of the work, will fill out <br />the necessary information in the work order. It can then be reviewed for detail and accuracy before approval. <br />Currently, when work is completed, information about the work is relayed to the Assistant Director, who enters the <br />data into Beehive. To enhance functionality, the Parks module should be acquired and mobile devices provided for <br />Operators working in the field. <br /> <br />The proper use and maintenance of this tool will be imperative to the success of the proposed work plan noted in <br />Recommendation 1. The work recorded in the CMMS should be reviewed and referenced when the work plan is <br />reviewed and decisions on operational initiatives or capital improvements are made. Most CMMS packages come <br />with their own standard set of reports, allowing custom reports to be created. It is important, then, that the <br />Department select or develop the necessary reporting tools to make the best use of their data. <br /> <br />It is also necessary to invest in sufficient staff training to ensure all staff can use Beehive proficiently. Failure to obtain <br />adequate training is a common cause of poor adoption of software in organizations and can jeopardize the substantial <br />investment made in the software. The Department should evaluate training courses offered on the program and take <br />advantage of as many of them as it deems necessary to properly utilize the tool toward its strategic objectives. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />