#04 - LELA Letter of Intent for Priority 2 Grant

Home Browse Search

3. Is technically and administratively feasible. Please detail how the proposed project is technically and administratively feasible. Although project details are not expected to be finalized until later in the application process, the basic elements of the project should be developed to ensure completion given the time frame and funding proposed. Evidence of a project’s feasibility can include, but is not limited to, the following: • The techniques/approaches/methods being used are well-established; • Your organization, collaborators, or partners have relevant experience with the proposed activities; • Cost and time estimates are based on other, similar projects that have been successfully executed or described in recent planning documents; • The project has the ability to secure relevant landowner support for the project, as needed (required in full grant application). 4. Would not jeopardize public health or safety. Projects must not threaten public health or safety. For example, proposed fishing projects must include communications consistent with the current MDH FCA guidelines. ☐ I attest that the project will comply with all relevant public health and safety regulations. ☐ I attest that the project meets one of the following: a. Would NOT increase public access to fishing, OR b. Would increase public access to recreational fishing and would include communications about fish consumption related risks consistent with current MDH FCA guidelines. 5. Complies with applicable laws, regulations, and rules. Projects must be legal and adhere to applicable federal, state, local, and tribal laws, rules, and regulations, including meeting all State ADA requirements. ☐ I attest that the project will comply with all applicable federal, state, local, and tribal regulations. 6. Unlikely to be completed without Priority 2 funding. Priority 2 funds may not be used as a substitute for traditional sources of funding or for required actions. However, Priority 2 funds can supplement the traditional sources if the proposed project would demonstrate additional resource benefits. ☐ I attest that Priority 2 funding would not be used to supplant existing funding.