Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2 <br /> <br />private wells and then be connected to the Lake Elmo’s municipal water system due to the <br />presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) pollution in the water supplied by <br />domestic wells in these homes. See City of Lake Elmo v. Metropolitan Council, 685 N.W. 2d 1 <br />(Minn. 2004) (directing the City of Lake Elmo to conform its comprehensive plan to the <br />Metropolitan Council’s system plan) and 2021 FOF, at ¶¶ 9 and 10. <br />5. In 2020, Lake Elmo requested a permit amendment that increased the volume of <br />water it could appropriate under Permit 1961-1031 from 260 million gallons of water per year to <br />540 million gallons per year (2020 Amendment Request) to service those areas previously <br />supplied with water by the City of Oakdale and to accommodate its anticipated growth. 2021 <br />FOF, at ¶ 4. Also in 2020, Lake Elmo requested a permit amendment to Permit 1961-1301 <br />authorizing it to construct a new water supply well (Unique Well No. 847064 – well No. 5). The <br />purpose of this request was to close Unique Well Number 208448 – (Well No. 1), because Well <br />No. 1 sat over groundwater polluted by PFAS. Id. at ¶¶ 1 and 2. This amendment would allow <br />Lake Elmo to appropriate the same volume authorized in Permit 1961-1031 without having to <br />appropriate from Well No. 1 (the well siting over the PFC Plume). Id. <br />6. On May 1, 2021, the DNR issued the 2021 FOF denying Lake Elmo’s request to <br />increase the volume of its appropriation authorized under Permit 1961-1031. Id. at ¶¶ 13 through <br />15 and Order. In that same order the DNR granted Lake Elmo’s request to close Well No. 1 and <br />open Well No. 5. This allowed Lake Elmo to appropriate the full volume of water authorized by <br />Permit 1961-1031 without risk that its municipal water source would be contaminated by PFAS. <br />Id. <br />7. On May 25, 2021, the DNR sent a letter to the Lake Elmo City Administrator <br />notifying Lake Elmo that it was appropriating water in exceedance of the volume authorized in <br />Permit 1961-1031. DNR advised Lake Elmo that, in accordance with the 2017 Order, DNR could <br />not increase the volume of the appropriation authorized by Permit 1961-1031 and that Lake Elmo <br />should look at other strategies to meet its demand for water. Letter from Randall Doneen DNR <br />Conservation Assistance and Regulations Section Manager to Kristina Handt, City <br />Administrator, City of Lake Elmo, (May 25, 2021). <br />8. On May 12, 2022, Lake Elmo submitted another request to the DNR to amend <br />Permit 1961-1031 by increasing the volume of water authorized by Permit 1961-1031 from 260 <br />million gallons per year to 540 million gallons of water per year. (2022 Amendment Request). <br />9. The 2022 Amendment Request for an increased appropriation was identical to the <br />request made in Lake Elmo’s 2020 Amendment Request in terms of the increased volume request. <br />10. The 2022 Amendment Request was initiated because Lake Elmo’s 2020 water use <br />exceeded the volume authorized by Permit 1961-1031. This exceedance was caused by population <br />growth and Lake Elmo’s decision to cease purchasing water from the City of Oakdale. The City of <br />Oakdale’s 2015 water supply plan estimated that City of Lake Elmo purchased 28.5 million gallons <br />of water per year from the City of Oakdale. In 2019 Lake Elmo reported that they had purchased <br />64.6 million gallons of water from the City of Oakdale in 2018. In 2021, the City of Lake Elmo did <br />not purchase water from the City of Oakdale. Lake Elmo also estimates that it will need this volume <br />of water to meet the requirements of the Metropolitan Council’s regional system plan growth <br />requirements. See City of Lake Elmo v. Metropolitan Council,685 N.W. 2d 1 (Minn. 2004) <br />(directing the City of Lake Elmo to conform its comprehensive plan to the Metropolitan Council’s