Laserfiche WebLink
Highpointe Crossing - 2298 Inwood Ave N – Lake Elmo – Preliminary Plat Narrative <br />February 26, 2026 <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />73% the total trip generation will be reduced by that amount as well. Under the 65 lot <br />plan the trips per day total was 669 per day 27% of that total is 180 trips per day. <br /> <br />d. Connection to Imperial – It is our understanding the City is rebuilding Imperial Ave this <br />summer. We would respectfully request the temporary cul-de-sac adjacent to our <br />development not be reconstructed as a cul-de-sac but as a typical street section and <br />that we coordinate this connection to our development. Why build a new cul-de-sac <br />only to tear it out a couple months later. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />5. Septic <br />We have completed the required initial testing for both primary and secondary areas. The <br />County has issued their preliminary approval. This letter is included with our submittal. As a <br />part of their approval process, the County asks for a 10,000 sf area of suitable soils. According to <br />the County this more than exceeds the area needed for primary and secondary septic drain field <br />areas, they no longer require showing two separate areas as referenced in the City’s ordinances. <br /> <br />a. Setbacks to treatment areas follow county and state setbacks and rules <br />i. 10’ to property lines <br />ii. 10’ to watermains <br />iii. 10’ to occupied buildings <br />iv. 75’ to wetland or unclassified body of water (this does not include storm water <br />ponds). There was an initial comment from staff about a required setback to <br />storm water ponds. None are required by the state or county. A response <br />regarding it was sent to the City staff with our concept review. <br /> <br /> <br />b. City Setback and Other Rules <br />i. The City has a 35’ setback to infiltration basins and so does guidance from the <br />Mn Storm Water Manual. During our sketch plan review the City asked if we <br />would follow the 35‘ setback for all storm water best management practices <br />(BMP) and we agreed to voluntarily modify our plans to provide 35’. Those <br />changes have been incorporated into the Preliminary Plat . <br /> <br /> <br />c. Future Final Septic Design Approval <br />i. The methodology used for the initial County approval is meant to show that at <br />the time of platting a lot there is enough area on the lot to accommodate <br />primary and secondary septic sites. A final detailed septic design is required as a <br />part of building a new home. That design process often ends up with septic <br />systems being located in areas outside of the original 10,000 sf test area. <br />