My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-08-26 Planning Commission Meeting Packet
LakeElmo
>
Commissions and Committees
>
6 - Planning Commission
>
02 - Packets
>
2020's
>
2026
>
06-08-26 Planning Commission Meeting Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2026 12:43:12 PM
Creation date
6/8/2026 12:40:02 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memorandum <br />800 Washington Avenue North, Suite 207 <br />Minneapolis, MN 55401 <br />May 18, 2026 <br /> <br />TO : SOPHIA JENSEN <br />FROM: SARAH EVENSON, PLA <br />RE: LIMERICK VILLAGE- LANDSCAPE AND TREE PRESERVATION PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW <br />SUBMITTALS <br />1. Limerick Village Sketch Plan, dated 7/28/23, received 8/2/23 <br />2. Limerick Village Preliminary Plat, Rezoning, and PUD Submittal, dated 2/27/26, received 4/21/26 <br />REVIEW HISTORY <br />1. August 8, 2023: Initial Sketch Plan Review <br />2. May 18, 2026: Preliminary Plat and PUD Landscape and Tree Preservation Plan Review <br />LOCATION: 79.4 acres west of Manning Avenue N, south of 10th St. N, north of I-94, east of Lake Elmo <br />Avenue N (former site of Lake Elmo Sod Farm) <br />CURRENT ZONING CATEGORY: Rural Transitional (RT). <br />ADJACENT AND SURROUNDING LAND USE: Rural Transitional (RT) to the northeast, Medium Density <br />Residential (MDR) to the northwest, Rural Transitional (RT) to the west and south. Future Land Use is <br />guided for Medium Density Residential (MDR) and High Density Residential (HDR). <br />SPECIAL LANDSCAPE PROVISIONS: none <br /> <br />TREE PRESERVATION PLAN: 105. 12. 470 <br />• Preservation of as many healthy and significant trees as possible is encouraged. It appears the <br />applicant is making no effort to preserve any significant trees on site. The site has several large <br />diameter Elms that have survived Dutch Elm Disease, in addition to many other large diameter trees <br />with significant tree canopies. These could be spectacular focal points for residents, and would make <br />the public park portion of this development much more pleasant than what is currently proposed. <br />Consider whether some of the housing might be flipped with Outlot A to preserve this small patch of <br />woodland in the northeast. <br />• Based on the chart on Sheet 91, the applicant will be required to plant 6 trees to mitigate hardwood <br />inches removed, 25 trees to mitigate conifer inches removed, and 53 trees to mitigate inches of <br />common trees removed, for a total of 84 trees. <br />• Ornamental trees are not acceptable as mitigation trees (remove last line of assumptions under <br />“Mitigation Required” on Sheet 80). <br />• The tree preservation plan requires the following adjustments prior to approval: <br />o Even if all trees on site are slated for removal, tree protection is still required for trees on <br />neighboring properties whose critical root zones (CRZs) may be impacted by construction <br />activity on this site. Applicant must swap out the tree protection fencing detail on sheet 92 for
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.