My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 91-33
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
Resolutions (1970's to 2020)
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Resolution 91-33
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2025 2:44:47 PM
Creation date
1/9/2014 1:20:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION NO, 91 -33 <br />CITE' OF LAKE ELMO <br />WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br />A RESOLUTION OPPOSING "POLICE BILL OF RIGHTS" LEGISLATION <br />(HR 2946) <br />WHEREAS, the U.S. Congress is considering adoption of legislation that would <br />pre -empt state and local laws and require cities to impose federal standards on the <br />conduct of internal investigations of police misconduct by the city while providing police <br />officers subject to such discipline the right to sue cities for monetary and other damages, <br />including full reinstatement; <br />WHEREAS, these provisions restrict the authority and ability of the Police Chief <br />to investigate allegations of police misconduct or use of excessive force; <br />WHEREAS, definitions provided in the legislation are so unclear that <br />interpretations could prevent any measures without the need for formal hearings; <br />WHEREAS, restrictions raise the issue of whether police officers would no <br />longer be subject to normal supervision; <br />WHEREAS, provisions raise the conduct of such disciplinary investigations to <br />the level of criminal proceedings; <br />WHEREAS, "Police Officers Bill of Rights" imposes the will of the federal <br />government on matters that are clearly state and local labor relations issues; <br />WHEREAS, some states, including Minnesota, have adopted similar <br />requirements, while others have rejected such legislation; <br />WHEREAS, the legislation directly interferes with local processes governing <br />provision of police services; <br />WHEREAS, provisions appear to disallow local appointment of civilian review <br />boards and require that the entire investigative file be open to the police officer under <br />investigation while not providing personnel file information on such officers to those <br />investigations; <br />WHEREAS, congress has failed to hold any hearings or to investigate the views <br />of police officials and others who would be adversely affected by such restrictions; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.