Resolution 95-33 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The League urges cities to adopt the following resolution in support of S.F. 563 (Johnson, J.), the Emerging Communications Acts of 1995, and to send a copy to local legislators requesting their active support of this bill. RESOLUTION NO. 95 -33 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PASSAGE OF THE "MINNESOTA. EMERGING COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES ACT OF 1995° WHEREAS, the City of Lalce E Imo (City) is responsible for monitoring the operation and activities of cable communications in the City, and WHEREAS, the City provides coordination of administration and enforcement of the cable franchise; promotes the development of locally produced cable television programming; and conducts such other activities to ensure equitable and reasonable rates and service Ievels for the citizens of City, and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the cable franchise to ensure the development and continued operation of a cable communications system so that the City may achieve better utilization and improvement of public services and contribute significantly to the communication needs of its residents, and WHEREAS, in pursuit of these goals the City has granted to private interests the use of Public Property and Public Right -of -Way. NOW, THEREFORE, at a regular meeting of the Lake E Into City Council dated xfardh , 21, , 1995, the City endorses the "Minnesota Emerging Communications Services Act of 1995" and encourages its adoption by the Minnesota State Legislature for the following reasons: FINDINGS 1. Public Property and Public nights -of -Way are valuable public assets and Local Authorities are entitled to ensure that the public is benefitted, compensated, protected and able to access and share in the use of any Emerging Communications Services that mattes use of those Public Rights-of-Way by a private for - profit provider. 2. There is a wide range of Persons seeking to use Public Property and the Public Rights-of- Way to deliver video, voice and data services and all such Persons should be treated similarly by State and Local Authorities. 3. Existing state statutes do not adequately address these Emerging Communications Services.