Laserfiche WebLink
i 0 .J <br />That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said <br />Section 36, described as follows: <br />Beginning at the southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the <br />Southeast Quarter; thence northerly along the west line a distance of <br />152.00 feet to a point; thence southeasterly in a straight line to a <br />point on the south line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southeast <br />Quarter, said point being 33 feet east of the point of beginning; <br />thence westerly 33 feet to the point of beginning. <br />Total area of this parcel is 23.22 acres, more or less. <br />fy <br />That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section <br />36, Township 29 North, Range 21 West, City of Lake Elmo, Washington <br />County, Minnesota described as follows: <br />Beginning at the southwest corner of said Northeast Quarter of the <br />Southwest Quarter; thence North 00 degrees 01 minute 17 seconds West, <br />bearing based on the Washington County Coordinate System, NAD 83, along <br />the west line of said Northeast quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a <br />distance of 624.83 feet; thence North 89 degrees 32 minutes 22 seconds <br />East, a distance of 1113.39 feet; thence South 51 degrees 25 minutes 29 <br />seconds East, a distance of 85.20 feet; thence South 12 degrees 19 <br />minutes 32 seconds East, a distance of 590.79 feet to the south line of <br />said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 89 <br />degrees 50 minutes 50 seconds West, along said south line, a distance <br />of 1305.85 feet to the point of beginning, containing 17.80 acres, more <br />or less. <br />WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission reviewed the <br />application at its October 25, 1999 meeting and recommended <br />that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment be denied based on the <br />following findings: <br />1. Land use classification of the site as Commercial is <br />inconsistent with the Commercial Use Comprehensive Plan Goals <br />and Policies regarding location. <br />2. The sand use reclassification of the site would result in an <br />18 acre " spot" surrounded by Limited Business and Rural <br />Agricultural Development classified lands. <br />3. The physical impacts to the environment and City <br />infrastructure would be substantially more negative from uses <br />of the land responsive to the Commercial land classification <br />applied for than the existing Rural Agricultural Development <br />classification. <br />WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo City Council reviewed the Comprehensive <br />Plan Amendment application on November 2, 1999, <br />