My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 99-48
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
Resolutions (1970's to 2020)
>
1990's
>
1999
>
Resolution 99-48
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2025 2:42:16 PM
Creation date
1/22/2014 2:14:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Another circumstance that creates a need for the second sign is the state's decision to move the <br />applicant's Manning Avenue driveway more than a block to the south. This was due to the stop light <br />and long median installed after the applicant purchased the property. Visible signage that clearly <br />marks the southern driveway and helps slow down traffic in a timely manner will help create a safe <br />turn opportunity. <br />4. The variance in signage would allow the applicant to enjoy some of the same rights commonly enjoyed <br />by other Lake Elmo properties and provide the applicant equal protection under the law. The ability to <br />effectively relay brand and price information is a right commonly shared by all in this type of zoning. <br />5. Neither of the circumstances mentioned in h5 about are due to our actions. In addition to the pre- <br />existing tree line Farmer's Union lost two curb cuts, one each on Hwy 5 and Manning Avenue. The <br />state and county removed the remaining curb cuts ftulher away from, the intersection. where speeds <br />would d be slower. They had no voice in this matter and received no compensation because of these <br />mandates. The loss of curb cuts and the relocation of entrances are a special circumstance not endured <br />by others in the same zoning district. <br />6. The variances do not provide the applicant a special privilege. To the contrary, they help partially <br />correct special negative characteristics of the property. <br />7. The variance is not detrimental due to the circumstances dictated by the special characteristics of this <br />unique property. To the contrary, it would help this contaminated site to be built upon. <br />BE IT .FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Lake Elmo Planning Commission hereby approves the <br />variances and issues this Order. <br />ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo Planning Commission this 9th day of August, 1999. <br />Thomas Armstrong, Chairman <br />Lake Elmo Planning Commission <br />ATTEST: <br />Mary Kdr, f er Admini or <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.