My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2004-007
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
Resolutions (1970's to 2020)
>
2000's
>
2004
>
Resolution 2004-007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2025 2:40:44 PM
Creation date
2/11/2014 2:58:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(Continued from Page 3) <br />A clause of the Arden Hills Policy that we did not discuss on December 30 (which I have <br />Ieft in our draft PTO Policy) addresses "Exempt Employee Flex -Time Guidelines ". The <br />issue of Comp Time has been addressed, and the Policy has been tinkered with, a number <br />of times in the past 5 years. Although the Policy is still difficult to follow, it appears that <br />the current Policy for exempt employees is that they may accrue Comp Time at a rate of <br />1 hour for each 3 hours worked — to a maximum of 16 hours <br />Personally, I have never been a fan of a fixed Policy regarding Comp Time for exempt <br />employees. It has always been my belief that time on the job in excess of the 40 hour <br />week was considered in the higher salary scales for managerial and professional staff <br />members; and, the ability of those managers and professionals to manage their own time <br />responsibly— "flex ", if you will. Even though I had never been formally credited Comp <br />Time for the many night meetings I worked with prior public employers, the former <br />administrator insisted that I do so here. I did accrue Comp Time beginning my second <br />year here (at the administrator's insistence), but I suspended that practice on the departure <br />of the former administrator on December 10, 2002 — as has Tom Bouthilet. Maybe that is <br />a function of our age, and/or a different perspective as to what constitutes being a <br />manager and professional. <br />What I have done since December 14, 2002 is to occasionally "flex" my work time — <br />always during the same work week, and only when the work load has permitted. As was <br />the case with prior public positions, I have seldom. totally balanced to a 40 hour week — <br />and that isn't of concern to me. If I had chosen to flex over the entire 2 week pay period — <br />which is permitted for exempt employees in many cities — I could have done a better job <br />of balancing. <br />I believe the formalization of "flex time" in the public sector has grown out of the <br />realization that, in some cases, the (now dated, I guess) concept of managers and <br />professionals working until the job is completed has been tarnished a bit by the simple <br />math of converting uncompensated hours to income per hour worked. In some cases, the <br />actual hourly compensation of managerial and professional staff ends up less than that <br />subordinate staff without the education and experience investments that resulted in the <br />others becoming managers and professionals. Arden Hills decided the time had arrived to <br />formalize a flex time solution in Policy. Perhaps the time has arrived here to both <br />distinguish Comp Time (for non - exempt) from Flex Time (for exempt) and move the flex <br />time concept to a legal and formal system. The Arden Hills approach seems as fair as any <br />I have seen to accomplish these goals, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.