My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2009-005
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
Resolutions (1970's to 2020)
>
2000's
>
2009
>
Resolution 2009-005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2025 2:38:46 PM
Creation date
4/30/2014 11:57:18 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
E. On October 28, 2008, the City's Consulting Engineer, TKDA, submitted a memo <br />indicating that it had reviewed the application and suggesting conditions for <br />approval ("TKDA Report") which is attached and incorporated as Exhibit B. <br />F. The FMHC application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at a public <br />hearing on November 10, 2008. The Planning Commission considered the <br />memorandum, comments and recommendations of the City Planner, the <br />comments and materials presented by FMHC; the comments and materials <br />presented by the public; and recommended approval of the wireless <br />telecommunication tower application subject to the conditions contained in the <br />TI(DA Report. <br />G. At various Council meetings, applicant and T-Mobile representatives: <br />I. Provided propagation maps illustrating coverage areas for towers which <br />were 125 feet and 75 feet in height, but did not provide propagation <br />maps for heights in between 75 feet and 125 feet; <br />2. Indicated a willingness to revise the height of the proposed tower from <br />125 feet to 3-io feet but stated it would not allow the review period to <br />extend beyond February 10, 2009', <br />3. Indicated that there could be ways to serve the required area other than <br />by one tower on the Olinger Property but did not define the other <br />options/ <br />4. Stated that the required coverage could be provided by a number of <br />shorter towers instead of one taller tower; <br />5. Stated that a 3.io foot tower would allow T-Mobile to provide the <br />required coverage but did not provide proof that a shorter tower could <br />also provide the required coverage. <br />H. On December 9, 2oo8, the City Council adopted Ordinance o8-03-3. relating to <br />wireless telecommunication towers. The Ordinance became effective on <br />January 8, 2009 and amended the City's wireless telecommunication tower <br />regulations to emphasize that wireless telecommunication towers should be <br />constructed in a manner that allows the towers to blend in with the surrounding <br />environments, emphasize the priority of the site locations for wireless <br />telecommunication towers; and 'to allow the City to waive collocation <br />requirements when necessary to permit the construction of a wireless <br />telecommunication tower that better blends into the surrounding environment. <br />Dn January 20, 2oog, FMHC, after discussions with the City Council, submitted <br />-evised tower plans. The plans depicted a i3.o foot tower with a canister-style <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.