Laserfiche WebLink
4) That the Variance will be located on property legally described as Lot 3, Block 1, J.L. <br />Cohn Subdivision, Washington Co., Minnesota. <br />5) The proposed lot line adjustment cannot be established under the conditions allowed by <br />the city's zoning regulations and no other reasonable alternative use exists. The two <br />affected property owners have assumed the line between their two properties was located <br />in an incorrect location. Previous property owners had made property improvements <br />based on the incorrect lot line location. There does not appear to be any other options <br />for re- aligning the shared property line in a way that would eliminate the need for a <br />variance. <br />6) The plight of the landowner is due to the physical conditions unique to the land and are <br />not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same zoning district. The site <br />is unique. The difference in elevation between the homes, the necessary maintenance of <br />the built retaining walls, and the maintenance of the drainage way to prevent erosion <br />problems make this a unique situation. The lot line adjustment would provide legal <br />access for the southerly property to continue the maintenance of this area. <br />i) The unique conditions of the site were not caused or accepted by the landowner after the <br />effective date of the city's zoning regulations. The subdivision creating the two affected <br />lots was approved before the City's current zoning regulations were adopted. Although <br />the lot sizes would have been conforming to the minimum lot size at some point in the <br />past, the two lots are now significantly smaller than the minimum 1.5 acres required in <br />an R -1 zone and Shoreland District. <br />Based on the foregoing, the Applicants' application for a Variance is granted. <br />Passed and duly adopted this 20th day of January 2009 by the City Council of the Lily � t ke <br />Elmo, Minnesota.° o <br />can A. Johnston, Mayo <br />