Laserfiche WebLink
and 0.27 acres in size, which is under the minimum lot size requirement of 1.5 acres. The <br />proposed parcels would also be 80 and 123.5 feet in length, which is shorter than the <br />minimum requirement of 150 feet. <br />4) That the Variance will be located on property legally described as follows: Lots 39 and <br />40, County Auditor's Plat No. 8, as surveyed and platted and now on file in the Office of <br />the Registrar of Titles of Washington County, Minnesota, being in the Village of Lake <br />Elmo, Minnesota. More commonly ki-own as 3549 Lake Elmo Avenue North. <br />j) That the strict enforcement of Zoning Ordinance would cause practical difficulties and <br />that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted <br />by an official control. Specificndirrgs: That the proposed use is reasonable because <br />the potential buyer of the,forrner Lake Elmo Bank building has stated that they do not <br />have a needfir all of the parking provided on the site. Between theformer Dank <br />building and the Christ Lutheran Church facility there is an expected an?ount of <br />parking that will be using this property that will not change due to a change in <br />ownership over a portion q f the site. <br />d) That the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not <br />created by the landowner. Specific findings: That the applicant's property is unique <br />due to the large amount of parking that exceeds most other offstreet parking lots <br />in <br />the downtown village area of Lake Elmo. The Zoning Ordinance does allow, for <br />waivers of parking requirements in the GB — General Business District and any future <br />users would need to request such a waiver under if their parking needs exceeded the <br />amount available. <br />7) That the proposed variance will not alter the essential character of the locality in which <br />the property in question is located. Specific,/indings.- That the proposed lot split will not <br />change the current use of the site for offices andparking. Any potential impacts <br />associated with a lack ofparking for the office uses could be mitigated with a shared <br />parking arrangement that allowed any potential building tenants to use the parking <br />area outside of peak Church usage periods. <br />8) That the proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to property <br />adjacent to the property in question or substantially increase the congestion of the public <br />streets or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. <br />FSpecific,lndingse No impacts above and kvond those considered norinaxlfor aanp other <br />business use in the surrounding area would be expected should the variance be <br />granted <br />Based on the foregoing, the Applicant's application for a Variance is granted, provided the <br />following conditions are met: <br />RESOLUTION 2013-07 <br />