Laserfiche WebLink
a) A variance from the minimum lot size requirements in the RS — Rural Single <br />Family Residential zoning district. The subject lot is 0.785 acres in size and the <br />minimum required size to be buildable is 0.9 acres. <br />b) A variance to waive the one-year deadline for completion of the work proposed <br />under the variance. <br />4) That the Variance will be located on property legally described as follows: Lot 9 of <br />Krause's Addition to the City of Lake Elmo, Washington County, Minnesota. PID <br />09.029.21.11.0015. <br />5) That the strict enforcement of Zoning Ordinance would cause practical difficulties and <br />that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted <br />by an official control. Specific findings: That the proposed use is reasonable because <br />the lot was platted as a buildable parcel and all other parcels of similar size have had <br />houses constructed on them since the subdivision was approved. The property is very <br />close to meeting the required 0.9 acre minimum lot size requirement, and construction <br />of a home on this lot will not be any more obstructive than structures built on lots <br />meeting the 0.9 acre requirement. The applicant also purchased the lot at the time it <br />was a buildable parcel The applicant has demonstrated the ability to install a <br />complaint septic system on the property. A five year deadline for construction of a <br />home on the property is a reasonable period of time for this work to be completed. <br />6) That the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not <br />created by the landowner. Specific findings: That the applicant's property is unique <br />due to former platting of this property as a buildable lot and continued classification of <br />the property as buildable since the lot was subdivided. The applicant purchased the <br />property with the understanding that a house could someday be built on the property, <br />and City records indicate that the lot was indeed buildable at the time ofpurchase. <br />Other homes on neighboring smaller lots were constructed prior to the adoption of the <br />City's zoning regulations <br />7) That the proposed variance will not alter the essential character of the locality in which <br />the property in question is located. Specific findings: The applicant's lot is larger than <br />several of the lots in the surrounding neighborhood and is close to the minimum size <br />needed to be considered buildable. The lot is of sufficient size to allow the installation <br />of a compliant septic system and to allow the placement of a home on the parcel <br />consistent with neighboring structures. <br />8) That the proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to property <br />adjacent to the property in question or substantially increase the congestion of the public <br />streets or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. <br />Specific findings: No impacts above and beyond those considered normal far any other <br />single-family lot in the surrounding neighborhood would be expected should the <br />variance be granted. <br />Resolution 2014-022 <br />