Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> AUGUST 21, 2012 <br /> <br />Page 4 of 15 <br /> <br />Council Member Emmons asked what the next MSA road projects on the horizon were. Mr. Griffin <br />said that the next project would be 20th Street from Lake Elmo Ave. east towards West Lakeland <br />Township. <br />Council Member Pearson asked for confirmation that reclamation was not an option due to the soil <br />boring test results. Mr. Griffin confirmed that reclamation was not an option. He indicated that this <br />proposal was rechecked with the geotechnical engineer. <br />Council Member Park asked for a reminder as to the importance and justification for the project. <br />Mr. Griffin explained that this connection must be made before the water system can grow and take <br />on more users. <br />Mayor Johnston reported an email he received regarding the installation of curbs and gutters. The <br />email was in opposition to the additional cost of the curbs and gutters. Again Mr. Griffin explained <br />that due to the rejection of the variance request, the curb and gutter option is the least expensive. <br />Mr. Griffin made it clear that the City did not jump straight to the curb and gutt er option, but this <br />was a reluctant decision. <br />Mayor Johnston stated the normal assessment policy where contiguous property owners are <br />assessed 30% of the cost and the City is responsible for 70%. He and Mr. Griffin discussed how the <br />City Assessment Policy takes the additional step of factoring in traffic data along Collector roads in <br />order to further reduce the burden on the adjacent owners. For this project the property owners <br />are only responsible for 6% and the City will be responsible for 94%. This was done by factoring in <br />the traffic volume for that road. <br />Council Member Park asked if the Lateral Benefit Charge was included in the Tablyn Park Project. <br />Mr. Griffin confirmed that similar charges were included, but he distinguished that project from the <br />Keats Ave project due to the 3M grant money included in Tablyn Park. <br />Council Member Emmons asked for clarification on why running the line down Lake Elmo Avenue <br />instead of Keats was not a feasible option. Mr. Griffin again explained that in order to meet the <br />2030 growth targets, the Keats Avenue line would still need to be completed eventually. Mr. Griffin <br />reiterated the fluid dynamics issues with the two line location options and the benefits of the Keats <br />Avenue option. <br />Mayor Johnston reopened the continuation of the public hearing at 8:00PM. <br />Peter Eggen of 5250 Keats Ave. N. spoke in opposition of the high costs being assessed to him. He <br />stated that at the last meeting all the residents in attendance were opposed to the project and did <br />not desire water access. He also stated he felt that he did not have any input on the project at all. <br />He said he understood that as a resident of Lake Elmo, he is subject to what Lake Elmo decides. <br />However, he told the council that if the City had to do this project, all the residents of Lake Elmo <br />should be responsible for the costs.