Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> AUGUST 21, 2012 <br /> <br />Page 8 of 15 <br /> <br />Council Member Emmons asked for clarification on the Environmental Projects Commission’s <br />involvement. Administrator Zuleger indicated that they undertook a cursory review of the issue. <br />Mr. Emmons suggested that perhaps the Commission be instructed to work on the project with the <br />expectation that the Council will take the issue up in 2014. City Staff would have minimal <br />involvement. Administrator Zuleger added that there are many resources available, such as the <br />Maplewood data that do not need staff involvement to evaluate. Mr. Zuleger also noted that <br />Maplewood is the first metro city in the past 20 years to successfully move to organized collection. <br />Mayor Johnston asked what information Maplewood would have in a year-and-a-half that it does <br />not have now. Administrator Zuleger said that because the Maplewood just started the collection, it <br />would be premature to look at the data. A year and a half or two years should provide sufficient <br />data. <br />Council Member Pearson again reiterated that he would like home owners and associations to <br />voluntarily investigate the issue on a smaller scale. Council Member Park agreed with Mr. <br />Pearson’s suggestion. She recommended that Administrator Zuleger suggest this approach to the <br />various associations when next meeting with them. <br />Mayor Johnston stated that he was troubled by waiting until 2014 to start the investigative process <br />with the timing restrictions already required by law. Council Member Pearson repeated his position <br />that he believed City staff could be better used elsewhere. He continued to question why action on <br />this issue was being pursued now after being tabled for so long. Mayor Johnston explained that he <br />is now moving on it because he did not have the cost savings figures until recently. Council Member <br />Park said she wants to put off discussing the issue because she does not believe they will be able to <br />decide even by 2014. <br />Justin Bloyer of 881 Jane Road North spoke in support of tabling the issue until 2014 in order to <br />thoroughly discuss the issue. Citing an admittedly unnamed study, Mr. Bloyer asked how the cost <br />per capita for road construction is the same for organized and non-organized cities. He also asked <br />why if organized collection resulted in such great cost savings, the policy is not being extended to <br />other areas, such as sewer pumping and grocery purchasing. Administrator Zuleger responded by <br />citing data from Oakdale and Roseville of realized savings in road maintenance. He also said that in <br />every study that he has seen there are general savings shown. <br /> <br />Council Member Pearson acknowledged that there are potential savings, but wants more time to <br />verify the claimed benefits. <br /> <br />Council Member Park does not support the motion having the Commission perform any work on <br />the issue during 2013 because of the staff time and resources required. Council Member Emmons <br />clarified that the motion would limit any staff time or resources. <br />