Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> SEPTEMBER 4, 2012 <br /> <br />Page 2 of 7 <br /> <br />for local youths and families. She explained municipal funding is an important aspect of the program and the YSB has requested the support in the amount of $3000 from the City of Lake Elmo. B) PROCLAIM WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 17 TO 23, 2012 CONSTITUTION WEEK Council Member Pearson read the proclamation proclaiming the week of September 17 through September 23, 2012 as Constitution Week. <br />CONSENT AGENDA <br /> 2. Approve Payment of Disbursements and Payroll in the Amount of $71,068.54. 3. Approve Updated 2012 Fee Schedule 4. Affirm Hiring of Building Official Rick Chase 5. 2012 Rain Garden Project - Award Contract 6. Authorization for John Shiltz to Dispense Beer and Wine Coolers at the Lake Elmo Days Community Event on September 7 and 8, 2012 <br /> <br />MOTION: Council Member Pearson moved to approve the Consent Agenda 2,4,5,6 as presented. <br />Council Member Park seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 5-0. <br /> *Council Member Smith acknowledged that the Council is excited to welcome the New Building Official Rick Chase. <br /> <br />ITEM 3: FEE SCHEDULE <br /> Council Member Emmons inquired about sewer fees and clarification on the updated fee schedule. City Clerk Thone clarified that the update was a routine housekeeping matter and there will be annual review of the fees for 2013. <br /> <br />MOTION: Council Member Emmons moved to approve Consent Agenda 3 as presented. Council <br />Member Pearson seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 5-0. <br /> <br />ITEM 7: ORDINANCE 2012-61 APPROVING ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT – SHORELAND <br />STANDARDS Planning Director Klatt explained the zoning text amendment related to the shoreline standards calling for slightly larger shoreland boat house requirements, which the Planning Commission approved. The proposed requirement would meet the state requirement. Mr. Klatt informed the council that the applicant, who is seeking the amendment, desires to build a structure under the proposed requirements. The applicant also requested that the setback requirements also be amended to conform to State standards. The Commission did not take action on the setback question, as it was not publically noticed in time for the last meeting.