Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 5, 2013 <br /> <br />Page 6 of 9 <br /> <br />provide the village green space. It was agreed that the Plan should recognize the existing character of the Village. The difference between mixed-use development and mixed-use zoning was discussed. The target of 934 REC units was discussed. Councilman Bloyer wanted to avoid being too confrontational with the Met Council. It was agreed that the Village Green project could be developed as part of a master plan led by private developers with the potential for city involvement. It was agreed that City Hall may be considered as part of the Village Green. It was agreed that environmental considerations should be encouraged. Greenbelt corridors/buffer zones and whether developers will plan accordingly on their own was discussed. Council Member Smith wanted to make sure that people know that the reduction of the corridor size does not change density. There were concerns about current residents keeping/protecting the open space they currently have. City Planner Johnson noted that by keeping corridor on map, it provides city’s expectations to developers. Ms. Smith is concerned about the proximity of and walk-ability of developments. Staff recommends doing it at subdivision/zoning level. City Attorney Snyder noted that usually the technical details/performance standards, such as setbacks, street widths, etc, are not in comp plan. It was agreed that the buffer would be addressed at the zoning level. The subject of existing ball field relocation was discussed. The definition of “auto oriented” was discussed. It refers to businesses that are reliant upon drive-up traffic as opposed to businesses which are related to automobiles. It was agreed upon that the ultimate goal was to create a pedestrian friendly district that provides excellent opportunities to live, work, and play. The last amendment was regarding the acquisition of land through either purchase or parkland dedication. There was a discussion about receiving public comments at this time. City Attorney Snyder advised Council that it was not required, but Council may do so if it wishes. A motion was needed. Mayor <br />Pearson MOVED TO OPEN MEETING FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. Seconded by Council Member Nelson. <br />Motion Passed 5-0. Susan Dunn spoke on the comprehensive plan. There has been discussion about extending services to non-compliant septic systems. Ms. Dunn asked city looks into costs for new systems. She noted that she is in favor of form-based zoning and design standards. Likes open space and wants the concept continued and afforded to future developments/homes. Design Standards and Form based codes were discussed. Messrs. Klatt and Johnson explained the status. The costs of city sewer were then discussed. It was noted that the actual costs are between $13,000-18,000 <br />Council Member Nelson MOVED TO CLOSE MEETING FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. Seconded by Council <br />Member Bloyer. Motion Passed 5-0.